Literature DB >> 33115479

Intramedullary reaming and irrigation and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation for the treatment of infection after intramedullary nailing: a retrospective study of 19 cases.

Hong-An Zhang1, Chun-Hao Zhou2, Xiang-Qing Meng1, Jia Fang1, Cheng-He Qin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of intramedullary infection is increasing with increased use of intramedullary fixation for long bone fractures. However, appropriate treatment for infection after intramedullary nailing is unclear. The purpose of this study was to report the results of our treatment protocol for infection after intramedullary nailing: intramedullary nail removal, local debridement, reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation with or without segmental bone resection and distraction osteogenesis.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with an infection after intramedullary nailing treated from 2014 to 2017 at our center. Patients with follow-up of less than 24 months, received other treatment methods, or those with serious medical conditions were excluded from the analysis. Patients met the criteria were treated as described above, followed by distraction osteogenesis in 9 cases to repair bone defect. The infection remission rate, infection recurrence rate, and post-operative complication rates were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included in the analysis. All of patients had satisfactory outcomes with an average follow-up of 38.1 ± 9.4 months (range, 24 to 55 months). Eighteen patients (94.7%) achieved infection remission; 1 patient (5.3%) developed a reinfection that resolved after repeat debridement. Nine patients with bone defects (average size 4.7 ± 1.3 cm; range, 3.3 to 7.6 cm) were treated with bone transport which successfully restored the length of involved limb. The mean bone transport duration was 10.7 ± 4.0 months (range, 6.7 to 19.5 months). The majority of patients achieved full weight bearing and became pain free during the follow-up period. Postoperative complications mainly included prolonged aseptic drainage (7/19; 36.8%), re-fracture (1/19; 5.3%) and joint stiffness, which were successfully managed by regular dressing changes and re-fixation, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Intramedullary nail removal, canal reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation (with or without distraction osteogenesis) is effective for treating infections after intramedullary nailing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Debridement; Fracture-related infection; Intramedullary nailing; Local antibiotic delivery; Reaming

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33115479      PMCID: PMC7594263          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03734-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


Introduction

Infection after intramedullary nailing is uncommon, with a reported rate of 0.9 to 3.8% [1, 2]. In a retrospective analysis of more than 1000 cases of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing, the infection rate after treatment of closed fractures was 1.9%, and the infection rate after treatment of open fractures was 7.7% [3, 4]. Although the infection rate is not high, if an infection is not treated in a timely manner, complications including osteomyelitis, fracture non-union, physical disability, or even systemic sepsis are inevitable. The management of this type of infection remains controversial [5, 6]. Makridis et al. [7] described 3 stages of infection after intramedullary nailing: Stage I; 2–6 weeks after operation manifesting as cellulitis, Stage II; 2–9 months after operation, manifesting as delayed wound healing, exudation, osteonecrosis, and pathological fracture, Stage III; 9 months or longer after operation manifesting as definite osteomyelitis. Each stage has its own management protocols. For the treatment of Stage I infections, a more conservative approach is widely accepted [5, 7]. However, opinions on the best treatments for Stage II and III infections vary greatly [1, 7, 8], especially when the fracture hasn’t healed yet. Unfortunately, to date there are no uniform and standard treatment protocol for Stage II and III intramedullary infections [5, 9]. Thus, the management of infections after intramedullary nailing tend to be experience-based, rather than evidence-based protocols. In our experience, an intramedullary nail as a foreign fixator lacks an adequate blood supply, which means systemic antibiotics cannot reach the interface of the nail to eradicate the biofilm bacteria effectively [10]. Furthermore, delayed or inappropriate treatments allow the pathogens to spread through the whole medullary canal resulting in a diffuse infection [10]. Therefore, we believe that nail removal and surgical debridement are vital for the treatment of Stage II and III infections after intramedullary nailing, as it destroys the biofilm produced by bacteria, and thus enhances the efficiency of antibiotics which in turn improves the infection remission rate. Surgical debridement mainly includes local debridement and intramedullary nail management. Intramedullary reaming and irrigation are important components of surgical debridement, since the process eliminates the endosteal sequestra of the canal, lowers the intraosseous pressure, improves vascularization of the bone, and removes the bacterial biofilm [11]. The effectiveness of reaming and irrigation for the treatment of intramedullary nail infections and osteomyelitis has been reported in prior studies [12-14]. After debridement, there may be remaining bacterial residue in the marrow canal or the surrounding soft tissue, and it only takes about 72 h for a bacterial biofilm to develop and become mature [15]. Due to the poor blood supply and osteonecrosis in osteomyelitis, administration of systemic antibiotics is usually not enough to eradicate the infection, and sometimes have little effect [16]. Antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate is an absorbable local antibiotic delivery system, and exhibits excellent osteogenesis and drug-loading properties. The advantages of antibiotic-loaded materials include more accurate positioning, higher local antibiotic concentration, less side effects, and longer treatment duration [17]. Studies have shown good outcomes when antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate is used for the treatment of bone infections [18, 19]. Based on literature data and our experience, we have developed a protocol for the treatment of infections after intramedullary nailing: intramedullary nail removal, local debridement, medullary canal reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation, with or without secondary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis. The purpose of this study is to describe this technique and report our results using the protocol for treating infections after intramedullary nailing.

Materials and methods

The records of patients diagnosed with an infection after intramedullary nail fixation and treated at our center from 2014 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria for study were: 1) Infection after initial intramedullary nail fixation and the intramedullary nail was in place when admitted to the hospital; 2) Treated as per our protocol described above; 3) Minimum follow-up of 24 months. The exclusion criteria were: 1) Patients with severe liver or kidney dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes with uncontrolled blood glucose; 2) Patient was not treated with our described method; 3) Follow-up < 24 months. Diagnosis of infection after intramedullary nailing was based on the clinical criteria described by Metsemakers et al. [20], which include the presentation of 1) a fistula, sinus, or wound breakdown, or 2) purulent drainage from the wound. Of course, we also combined the presence of positive biochemical infection markers, imaging results, and culture and histology results of tissue samples collected during surgery. Before surgical interventions, patients were informed with the details of treatment protocols, and the informed consents were signed by patients themselves. Our study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital and Nanfang Hospital.

Surgical technique

The intramedullary nail was removed first, and subsequent debridement procedures were based on whether or not the fracture had healed. In the case of healed fractures, the entry point of the intramedullary nail was enlarged. Since the reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) system is not available in our country, irrigation fluid cannot be aspirated directly. Therefore, distal diaphysis fenestration was performed to allow drainage of the irrigation fluid and necrotic tissues. The medullary canal was reamed repeatedly with a larger-diameter reamer head (size based on preoperative measurements and information of the initial surgery) to completely debride necrotic tissue. Local debridement was also performed which consisted of removal of all infected bone, soft tissue, and any sinuses. Segmental bone resection was not performed in cases with healed fractures, since none of cases presented with diffuse osteomyelitis according to the Cierny-Mader classification [21]. For cases without bone union, after intramedullary nail removal the fracture site was segmentally resected to reduce the possibility of infection recurrence [22]. Bony defects in these cases were managed by osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis in a secondary surgery, after markers of inflammation had returned to normal levels. Surrounding soft tissues were also debrided. In all patients, samples were sent for culture and pathological examination. After radical debridement, the medullary canal was irrigated with saline using an impulsive irrigation gun. Elimination of the dead space caused by removal of the intramedullary nail and reaming was directly filled with antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate (Stimulan, Biocomposites Ltd.). The antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate was prepared with a ratio of vancomycin 0.5 g + gentamycin 2 ml + calcium sulfate 5 cm3. An appropriate amount of saline was added to the mixture, and the calcium sulfate preparation was injected into the medullary canal and the segmental bone defect. Considering the economic situations of patients and the potential cytotoxic effect of calcium sulfate, the total volume of the calcium sulfate preparation used per patient was no more than 50 ml. Vancomycin and gentamicin were both used in the preparation, in order to cover both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. After implantation, an external fixator was used in 13 cases for avoiding debridement-related fracture (4 cases) or secondary distraction osteogenesis in 9 cases with bone defects.

Postoperative management

Intravenous antibiotics were empirically administrated until culture results were available, and then adjusted based on the results. Due to the application of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate, the total course of systemic antibiotics was less than 2 weeks. Patients with bony defects received an osteotomy in a secondary surgery, and bone transport was carried out 1 week after the surgery, with an initial rate of 1 mm/day, and then regulated according to the rate of bone formation and patient feedback. During follow-up, patients received testing of white blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs to determine the effectiveness of infection elimination and bone formation. External fixators were removed once bones were determined to be strong enough for weight bearing. Walking-aids were recommended for the first several weeks after the operation and 1 month after external fixation removal for patients who received segmental bone resection and bone transport. For patients without bone transport, however, early rehabilitation training without any assistance was encouraged.

Outcome evaluation

Infection Remission was defined as the absence of any positive markers of infection, no evidence of infection on radiographs or physical examination, and a completely healed wound. Bone Union was assessed by the formation of new bone on radiographs. Infection Recurrence was defined by the presence of positive clinical symptoms, radiographic findings, and elevated levels of inflammatory markers. Continuous drainage without signs of a local infection for more than 1 month was defined as prolonged aseptic drainage.

Results

A total of 19 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. There were 15 men and 4 women with a mean age of 39.0 ± 10.1 years (range, 23 to 56 years). The femur was involved in 7 patients and tibia in 12 patients, and all fractures were due to some form of trauma (traffic trauma in10 cases, falling injury in 6 cases and heavy pound injury in 3 cases). Nine patients suffered from infection on right extremity while 10 patients on left extremity. All patients presented with a sinus at their first physical examination, and preoperative radiographs indicated that 10 patients had healed fractures and 9 patients had unhealed fractures. The mean preoperative ESR was 49.4 ± 34.2 mm/h, mean CRP level was 33.1 ± 23.8 mg/L, and the mean WBC count was 12.75 ± 6.63 × 109/L. Patient preoperative data are summarized in Table 1. In all cases, no antibiotics were administered until after specimens were obtained for culture during surgery.
Table 1

Preoperative characteristics of nineteen cases

Case No.AgeInitial traumaSite/SideOpen or closed fracturehistory (months)SinusFracture healed or notInfection markers before surgery
144Falling heightFemur/RClosed36YesYes

WBC: 6.4 × 109

CRP: 56.7

ESR: 14

252Traffic traumaTibia/LOpen13YesYes

WBC: 5.7 × 109

CRP: 9

ESR: 26

333Falling heightTibia/RClosed3YesNo

WBC: 11.3 × 109

CRP: 77

ESR: 101

437Traffic traumaFemur/ROpen48YesYes

WBC: 6.8 × 109

CRP: 9.4

ESR: 37

524Falling heightTibia/ROpen6YesYes

WBC: 6.3 × 109

CRP: 5.3

ESR: 29

626Falling heightTibia/LClosed14YesNo

WBC: 5.7 × 109

CRP: 7.4

ESR: 45

744Heavy pound injuryTibia/LOpen4YesNo

WBC: 10.5 × 109

CRP: 23.2

ESR: 15

844Traffic traumaFemur/LClosed20YesYes

WBC: 18.3 × 109

CRP: 37.3

ESR: 114

947Traffic traumaFemur/ROpen36YesYes

WBC: 12.6 × 109

CRP: 35.3

ESR: 89

1045Falling heightTibia/LOpen40YesYes

WBC: 10.3 × 109

CRP: 42.6

ESR: 67

1152Heavy pound injuryTibia/LClosed5YesYes

WBC: 7.5 × 109

CRP: 18.3

ESR: 5

1237Traffic traumaTibia/LOpen19YesNo

WBC: 22.1 × 109

CRP: 51.0

ESR: 78

1346Traffic traumaFemur/LOpen13YesNo

WBC: 9.3 × 109

CRP: 11.3

ESR: 25.7

1427Traffic traumaFemur/RClosed15YesYes

WBC: 17.7 × 109

CRP: 77.5

ESR: 32

1534Traffic traumaTibia/ROpen30YesYes

WBC: 28.3 × 109

CRP: 44.9

ESR: 29

1656Falling heightTibia/LClosed7YesNo

WBC: 8.1 × 109

CRP: 65.3

ESR: 29

1723Traffic traumaTibia/ROpen11YesYes

WBC: 17.5 × 109

CRP: 10.6

ESR: 76

1828Traffic traumaFemur/RClosed11YesYes

WBC: 21.8 × 109 CRP: 28.9

ESR: 23

1942Falling heightTibia/LClosed17YesNo

WBC: 16.1 × 109

CRP: 17.3

ESR: 103

Preoperative characteristics of nineteen cases WBC: 6.4 × 109 CRP: 56.7 ESR: 14 WBC: 5.7 × 109 CRP: 9 ESR: 26 WBC: 11.3 × 109 CRP: 77 ESR: 101 WBC: 6.8 × 109 CRP: 9.4 ESR: 37 WBC: 6.3 × 109 CRP: 5.3 ESR: 29 WBC: 5.7 × 109 CRP: 7.4 ESR: 45 WBC: 10.5 × 109 CRP: 23.2 ESR: 15 WBC: 18.3 × 109 CRP: 37.3 ESR: 114 WBC: 12.6 × 109 CRP: 35.3 ESR: 89 WBC: 10.3 × 109 CRP: 42.6 ESR: 67 WBC: 7.5 × 109 CRP: 18.3 ESR: 5 WBC: 22.1 × 109 CRP: 51.0 ESR: 78 WBC: 9.3 × 109 CRP: 11.3 ESR: 25.7 WBC: 17.7 × 109 CRP: 77.5 ESR: 32 WBC: 28.3 × 109 CRP: 44.9 ESR: 29 WBC: 8.1 × 109 CRP: 65.3 ESR: 29 WBC: 17.5 × 109 CRP: 10.6 ESR: 76 WBC: 21.8 × 109 CRP: 28.9 ESR: 23 WBC: 16.1 × 109 CRP: 17.3 ESR: 103 Thirteen patients required external fixation, and 9 of these patients received segmental bone resection and bone transport after the infection markers became normal, and started bone transport 1 week later (Fig. 3) aiming to repair the bone defect. The average bone defect was 4.7 ± 1.3 cm (range, 3.3 to 7.6 cm). Four patients who did not receive segmental bone resection were treated with external fixation to assist weight bearing because bone debridement was very extensive. Postoperatively, clindamycin, cephalosporins, or quinolones were the most commonly administered intravenous antibiotics, with a mean duration of 8.3 ± 3.2 days (range, 3–14 days). Conventionally, a total course of antibiotics includes 2 weeks of for intravenous administration, and an additional route and another 4 weeks of oral administration. In our protocol, we omitted the 4 weeks of oral antibiotic administration because we deemed the extremely high concentrations and fairly long curative duration produced by the local antibiotic delivery system was enough to eradicate residual bacteria. The mean time for normalization of infection markers after surgery was 3.4 ± 1.7 weeks (range, 2 to 8 weeks).
Fig. 3

Representative case of intramedullary nail removal, debridement, application of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate, external fixation, and bone transport

A total of 20 strains of bacteria were isolated from 17 cases, with a positive culture rate of 89.5% (17/19). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (30.0%, 6/20) was the most commonly isolated pathogen, followed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (25.0%, 5/20), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (25.0%, 5/20), and Escherichia coli (15%, 3/20). Polymicrobial infections were identified in 3 patients (15.8%, 3/19). The distribution of bacterial culture results are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Distribution of bacterial culture results after operation

Distribution of bacterial culture results after operation With a mean follow-up of 38.1 ± 9.4 months (range, 24 to 55 months), 18 (94.7%) patients achieved infection remission after the first surgical treatment, while 1 patient (5.3%) developed infection recurrence 3 months after surgery and underwent segmental resection and bone transport. The representative cases were presented in Figs. 2 and 3. Twelve (63.2%) patients became completely pain-free, and 16 (84.2%) patients achieved full weight bearing during the follow-up period. One patient (5.3%) experienced a re-fracture 4 months after surgery, and was successfully treated with external fixation. Prolonged aseptic drainage was the most frequent postoperative complication, and occurred in 7 patients (36.8%). In all cases, the drainage was successfully treated with regular local wound care and dressing changes. Bone transport was successful in all patients, and the mean fixation duration was 10.7 ± 4.0 months (range, 6.7 to 19.5 months). attributing to early function rehabilitation, only 1 (5.3%) case was recorded with joint stiffness after bone transport. Surgery and follow-up data are summarized in Table 2.
Fig. 2

Representative case of intramedullary nail removal, debridement, and application of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate

Table 2

The details of surgery and follow-up outcomes of nineteen cases

Case No.MicrobiologyDescription of surgeryTime for normalization of infection markersFollow-up (months)RecurrenceOutcome
1MRSAIM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF2 weeks36No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

2E. coliIM nail removal+Debridement+CS4 weeks24No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

3CoNS +E. coli

IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+

Bone transport

8 weeks38NoMild pain with movement, FWB mobilisation
4IM nail removal+Debridement+CS4 weeks37No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

5MSSA

IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+

Bone transport

3 weeks27No

Mild pain and movement limitation

on

right ankle

6MRSA

IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+

Bone transport

2 weeks26No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

7CoNSIM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF5 weeks41Yes, 3 months after the first surgerySegmental resection and bone transport
8Ent. CloacaeIM nail removal+Debridement+CS2 weeks46No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

9IM nail removal+Debridement+CS4 weeks25NoRefracture four months after first surgery, followed by EF fixation
10CoNS

IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+

Bone transport

2 weeks33No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

11MSSAIM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF3 weeks52No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

12CoNS

IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+

Bone transport

3 weeks41NoMild pain with movement, FWB mobilisation
13MSSAIM nail removal+Debridement+CS2 weeks38No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

14MSSAIM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF2 weeks40No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

15MSSA

IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+

Bone transport

3 weeks30NoMild pain with movement, FWB mobilisation
16MRSAIM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF2 weeks55No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

17E.coli+MRSAIM nail removal+Debridement+CS2 weeks44No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

18CoNS

IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+

Bone transport

6 weeks37NoMild pain with movement, FWB mobilisation
19CoNS+MRSA

IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+

Bone transport

6 weeks54No

Pain free, FWB

mobilisation

CoNS coagulase-negative staphylococcus, E. coli Escherichia coli, Ent. Cloacae Enterobacter cloacae, MRSA methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MSSA methicillinsensitive Staphylococcus aureus

CS, calcium sulfate; EF, external fixator; IM, intramedullary

CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; WBC, white blood cells FWB, full weight bearing

Representative case of intramedullary nail removal, debridement, and application of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate Representative case of intramedullary nail removal, debridement, application of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate, external fixation, and bone transport The details of surgery and follow-up outcomes of nineteen cases Pain free, FWB mobilisation Pain free, FWB mobilisation IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+ Bone transport Pain free, FWB mobilisation IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+ Bone transport Mild pain and movement limitation on right ankle IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+ Bone transport Pain free, FWB mobilisation Pain free, FWB mobilisation IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+ Bone transport Pain free, FWB mobilisation Pain free, FWB mobilisation IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+ Bone transport Pain free, FWB mobilisation Pain free, FWB mobilisation IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+ Bone transport Pain free, FWB mobilisation Pain free, FWB mobilisation IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+ Bone transport IM nail removal+Debridement+CS + EF+ Bone transport Pain free, FWB mobilisation CoNS coagulase-negative staphylococcus, E. coli Escherichia coli, Ent. Cloacae Enterobacter cloacae, MRSA methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MSSA methicillinsensitive Staphylococcus aureus CS, calcium sulfate; EF, external fixator; IM, intramedullary CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; WBC, white blood cells FWB, full weight bearing

Discussion

Infection after intramedullary nailing is defined as a confined or diffuse infection of medullary cavity caused by the invasion of pathogens during intramedullary nailing. Although uncommon, it often leads to serious consequences if not treated timely and appropriately. Today’s treatment protocols of such disease vary widely according to the severity of infection and doctor’s experience, and a wide-accepted method remains unclear. In our study, we hold a more aggressive treatment method on the management of intramedullary infection since we put the infection controlling on a higher priority. After surgical debridement and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation, 94.7% of patients achieved infection remission after surgical treatment, while only 1 patient developed a recurrence of infection and required a second surgery. We speculate that the high remission rate is attributed to radical debridement and the use of a local antibiotic delivery system. This method thoroughly removes infected tissues and eliminates residual bacteria due to a high local antibiotic concentration and long treatment duration. Such remarkable result was similar to the previous reports. Kanakaris et al. [23] performed intramedullary nail removal, intramedullary debridement with a RIA device, and placement of antibiotic-loaded cement rods for the treatment of 24 patients with infections. The cement rods were removed once the infections were controlled, and with mean follow-up of 21 months 23 (96%) patients had no evidence of recurrent infection. The difference between their study and ours lies in the use of a RIA device and antibiotic cement. The RIA system is a device that was initially developed to prevent fat embolism and lessen the systemic inflammatory process after reaming the femur in nailing procedures [24, 25]. Due to its versatility, it has been expanded to the treatment of long bone osteomyelitis [26, 27]. Unfortunately, the RIA system is not available in our country; however, the method we used produces similar results as the use of a RIA system. The other difference between the studies is the topical antibiotic carrier. Although antibiotic-loaded cement used in medullary infection have been well-demonstrated in former studies [7, 23, 27], one of the shortcomings of such material was non-absorbable after implantation, thus required a second procedure to remove it because leaving the rods in place can increase the risk of recurrent infection. Additionally, the antibiotic level curve produced by such antibiotic cement rod has been shown to be unstable, which might lead to a sharp decrease of antibiotic level several days after implantation, resulting in incomplete eradication of the pathogens, or even becoming a nidus for bacterial colonization. In another case series, Qiang et al. [28] treated infections after intramedullary nailing in 19 patients with nail removal, reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded cement implantation. All 19 patients achieved remission from infection, although there was 1 case of non-union and 1 patient ultimately required amputation due to severe trauma. However, The shortcoming in his study was similar. As the PMMA cement was absorbable, a second surgery was necessary for cement removal. Nine of our 19 patients were treated with additional segmental bone resection and bone transport, and all of patients achieved infection remission, and the lengths of the involved limbs were well-restored. Although our outcomes were satisfactory, the best protocol for the management of non-healing fractures is not clear and treatments are primarily based on the experiences of individual surgeons. Those who prefer to retain the nails believe that fracture healing is more important, and that management of intramedullary infection can be postponed until after bone union. On the other hand, some surgeons believe infection control should take priority. Thus, based on different concepts treatment protocols mainly include 1) local debridement and antibiotic administration and retaining the nail until after bone union, 2) nail removal, re-reaming, and replacement of a larger diameter intramedullary nail or a resorbable antibiotic coated nail [10, 23], and 3) nail removal, segmental bone resection, reaming and irrigation, and bone defect reconstruction with bone transport [29] or the Masquelet technique [30, 31]. We are inclined to a more aggressive treatment protocol, and in our opinion retaining the nail or replacing it with another internal fixation device after debridement is not suitable for infection control, because the residual pathogens and its biofilms might lead a higher potential for infection recurrence and treatment failure [6]. External fixation avoids this shortcoming and remains the recommendation for treatment of bone infections [6, 11]. Additionally, a persistent infection or infection recurrence might prevent the bone healing process [32], and even lead to diffuse osteomyelitis and resulting disability and amputation. External fixation combined with segmental bone resection and transport as a mature and efficient technique can be used to manage infection, nonunion and bone defects, and deformity at the same time. Local antibiotic-carriers were proposed in 1970s [33, 34], and are currently recommended as a bone substitute in the management of bone defects, or as a local antibiotic carrier in the case of bone infection. In our study, we used an injectable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate, which overcomes the shortcomings of PMMA cement, such as difficulty in intramedullary placement, the need for a second surgery for removal, and an unstable antibiotic release curve. As an absorbable antibiotic carrier, calcium sulfate has a stable antibiotic release curve, and can maintain the local antibiotic level higher than the MIC for 6–8 weeks. The local concentration is 100 to 1000 times higher than the antibiotic levels resulting from intravenous administration [35], which is sufficiently high to penetrate the bacterial biofilm. Furthermore, calcium sulfate exhibits a similar microstructure to cancellous bone and after being absorbed a network structure remains and trabecular bone can be observed under a light microscope, which contributes to the growth and migration of blood vessels and bone cells [36, 37]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other studies reporting the use of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate to treat the medullary canal after removal of an intramedullary nail because of an infection. Prolonged aseptic drainage was the most frequent complication in our study, with a relatively high rate of 36.8%, with prior studies reporting rates ranging from 4.2 to 33% [38-40]. In our experience, poor soft tissue coverage, scar formation, and excessive calcium sulfate implantation may be the reasons for the high incidence of postoperative exudation. Although this type of aseptic exudation is not a sign of infection, management is important as a persistently wet gauze can increase the risk of a wound infection. Generally, routine treatment of prolonged drainage includes regular dressing and wound care. Other effective methods to prevent prolonged aseptic drainage may include good soft tissue coverage and reduction of the amount of calcium sulfate implanted. Other complications of the treatment of intramedullary nail infection include hypercalcemia, debridement-related fracture, and post-operative pain and joint stiffness; however, these complications were rare in our series. There are limitations of this study that need to be considered. Firstly, our outcomes were not compared with those of other surgical methods. In addition, some detailed patient data were not available because of the retrospective nature of the study, and this might influence the understanding of outcomes. Finally, our patients were heterogeneous, with different sites of infection (tibia or femur), infection with bone union or non-union, and receiving bone transport or not, all of which inevitably can lead to more complex outcomes. However, we have to point out that the emphasis of our study was to introduce an effective method to eliminate infection after intramedullary nailing, and from this perspective all patients received the same management and overall the outcomes were good.

Conclusion

Intramedullary nail removal, medullary reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation seems effective in the treatment of infection after intramedullary nailing. Additional prospective studies with larger case numbers are necessary to confirm our findings.
  38 in total

Review 1.  Biodegradable antibiotic delivery systems.

Authors:  M El-Husseiny; S Patel; R J MacFarlane; F S Haddad
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-02

2.  Masquelet technique and osteomyelitis: innovations and literature review.

Authors:  S Careri; R Vitiello; M S Oliva; A Ziranu; G Maccauro; C Perisano
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.507

Review 3.  Reaming of the medullary cavity and its effect on diaphyseal bone. A fluorochromic, microangiographic and histologic study on the rabbit tibia and dog femur.

Authors:  G Danckwardt-Lillieström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1969

4.  Treatment of infection following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures-results of the ORS/ISFR expert group survey.

Authors:  Cyril Mauffrey; David J Hak; Peter Giannoudis; Volker Alt; Christoph Nau; Ingo Marzi; Peter Augat; J K Oh; Johannes Frank; Andreas Mavrogenis; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Noel Argenson; Ashok Gavaskar; David Rojas; Yehia H Bedeir
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Current treatment of infected non-union after intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  A Hamish Simpson; Jerry S T Tsang
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Calcium sulphate delivery system with tobramycin for the treatment of chronic calcaneal osteomyelitis.

Authors:  P J Papagelopoulos; A F Mavrogenis; S Tsiodras; C Vlastou; H Giamarellou; P N Soucacos
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  The use of a biodegradable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate carrier containing tobramycin for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a series of 195 cases.

Authors:  J Y Ferguson; M Dudareva; N D Riley; D Stubbs; B L Atkins; M A McNally
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  The treatment of intramedullary osteomyelitis of the femur and tibia using the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator system and antibiotic cement rods.

Authors:  N Kanakaris; S Gudipati; T Tosounidis; P Harwood; S Britten; P V Giannoudis
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Novel technique for medullary canal débridement in tibia and femur osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Charalampos G Zalavras; Anshuman Singh; Michael J Patzakis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Interest of nailing associated with the Masquelet technique in reconstruction of bone defect.

Authors:  Gamal Ayouba; François Lemonne; Noufanangue Kanfitine Kombate; Batarabadja Bakriga; James Yaovi Edem; Uzel André-Pierre Max
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-12-31
View more
  5 in total

1.  Intramedullary application of local antibiotic bullets for the treatment of long bone fracture related infection.

Authors:  Preemal Patel; Alexis-Dimitris Iliadis; Alexandros Vris; Nima Heidari; Alex Trompeter
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-01-13

2.  Simulated large joint fluid model for evaluating intra-articular antibiotic delivery systems: initial evaluation using antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads.

Authors:  Edward J McPherson; Jessica A Jennings; Omar Yunis; Michael A Harris; Matthew V Dipane; Nora L Curtin; Madhav Chowdhry; Andrew J Wassef; Joel D Bumgardner; Scott P Noel
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  Antibiotic calcium sulfate-loaded hybrid transport versus traditional Ilizarov bone transport in the treatment of large tibial defects after trauma.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Cheng Ren; Ming Li; YiBo Xu; Zhong Li; Hua Lin; Kun Zhang; Teng Ma
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Antibiotic artificial bone implantation and external fixation for the treatment of infection after intramedullary nail fixation: a retrospective study of 33 cases.

Authors:  Haotian Hua; Lei Zhang; Zairan Guo; Wenlong Zhong; Jiangfei Chen; Shilin Wang; Jiangang Guo; Xinwei Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Intramedullary Canal Injection of Vancomycin- and Tobramycin-loaded Calcium Sulfate: A Novel Technique for the Treatment of Chronic Intramedullary Osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Ahmed H Elhessy; Jessica C Rivera; Henry T Shu; Taj-Jamal Andrews; John E Herzenberg; Janet D Conway
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2022 May-Aug
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.