| Literature DB >> 33114261 |
Melania Bednarek1, Katarina Borska1,2, Przemysław Kubisa1.
Abstract
Polylactide (PLA) is presently the most studied bioderived polymer because, in addition to its established position as a material for biomedical applications, it can replace mass production plastics from petroleum. However, some drawbacks of polylactide such as insufficient mechanical properties at a higher temperature and poor shape stability have to be overcome. One of the methods of mechanical and thermal properties modification is crosslinking which can be achieved by different approaches, both at the stage of PLA-based materials synthesis and by physical modification of neat polylactide. This review covers PLA crosslinking by applying different types of irradiation, i.e., high energy electron beam or gamma irradiation and UV light which enables curing at mild conditions. In the last section, selected examples of biomedical applications as well as applications for packaging and daily-use items are presented in order to visualize how a variety of materials can be obtained using specific methods.Entities:
Keywords: crosslinking; electron-beam; gamma rays; irradiation; photo-crosslinking; poly(lactic acid); polylactide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33114261 PMCID: PMC7660633 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25214919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Possible processes involving radicals on polylactide (PLA) chains formed by irradiation with an electron beam (on the basis of Reference [27]).
Figure 2Multifunctional crosslinking agents applied in radiation-induced crosslinking [30]. (Adapted with permission from Elsevier, 2005).
Ionizing radiation curing of polylactide.
| Polylactide-Based Polymer (Mn, g·mol−1) | Radiation Type, Dose | Curing Co-Agent | Gel Content, | Achieved Results | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLLA (99,000) | Electron beam, | TAIC, TMAIC, TMPTA, TMPTMA, HDDA, derivative of EG | 0.1–88 | Together with annealing | [ |
| PLLA | Electron beam, | TAIC, TMAIC, TMPTA, TMPTMA, HDDA, derivative of EG | 10–83 | Stability at higher melting temperature; application of the crosslinked PLLA on heat-shrinkable tubes, cups and plates. | [ |
| PLLA (115,100), PDLLA (197,000) | Electron beam, | TAIC | ~40–100 | Shifts of Tcc to higher and Tm to lower temperatures; | [ |
| Equimolar blend of PLLA and PDLA | Electron beam, | TAIC + supercritical CO2 | ~30–90 | Shift of Tm of homo crystals to lower temp.; | [ |
| PLLA (155,500) | Electron beam | TAIC | NA | Pristine PLA: Only degradation was observed; | [ |
| PLA | Electron beam, | TAIC | 68.2–89.4 | For neat PLA: only degradation; | [ |
| PLA (155,500) /PCL (82,500) blend | Electron beam, | TAIC | NA | PLA: Increase of flexural modulus, tensile strength, flexural strength, decrease of elongation at break; | [ |
| PLA (91,000)/PBAT (35,000) blend | Electron beam, | TAIC | 40–90 | Crosslinking and degradation after irradiation mostly in PLA phase, PBAT less susceptible to radiation influence. | [ |
| PLLA | Electron beam, | TAIC | 7.6–62.5 | Increase of tensile strength of about 20% in the presence of TAIC at 40kGy of irradiation dose; irradiation in the presence of TAIC led to reduced enzymatic degradation; decrease of interfacial adhesion of flax fibers and PLA matrix in the presence of TAIC. | [ |
| PLA | Electron beam, | - | NA | Increase of Tg, crystallinity and young modulus, decrease of elongation at brake and oxygen permeability. | [ |
| PLA/PEGM/HBN blend composite | Electron beam, | - | NA | At low doses: partial branching and crosslinking for neat PLA and PLA/PEGM; | [ |
| PLLA | γ-rays | TAIC | 10–100 | Decrease of swelling with increasing gel content, decrease in elongation (75%), maintenance of tensile strength, decrease of crystallinity (from 36 to 10%) and Tm (from 182 to 165 °C). | [ |
| PLA | γ-rays | TAIC | 70–90 | Increase of the gel fraction in PLA/ | [ |
| PLA | γ-rays | TAIC, | Up to 80 | Higher degree of crosslinking for PLA/OvPOSS in comparison to PLA/TAIC; irradiated composites exhibited decrease of crystallinity, lower elongation at break and higher E-modulus, higher thermal stability and heat deflection temp. than that of neat PLA | [ |
| PLA | γ-rays | TAIC as crosslinking agent (CA), | 1.2–46.2 | Considerable gel formation was observed for PLA/CA at high irradiation dose; addition of CA or CE increased the shear viscosity of neat and irradiated PLA; addition of CA and CE enhanced Tc and decreased crystallinity; improvement of tensile properties was higher for CA. | [ |
TAIC—tiallyl isocyanurate; TMAIC—trimethylallyl isocyanurate; TMPTA—trimethylolpropane triacrylate; TMPTMA—trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate; HDDA—1,6-hexanediol diacrylate; EG—ethylene glycol bis(pentakis(glycidyl allyl ether))ether, hydroxy terminated; PDLLA—polylactide prepared from racemic mixture of D-LA and L-LA; PBAT—poly(butylene adipate-co-terepthalate); PEGM—poly(ethylene-co-glycidyl methacrylate); HBN—hexagonal boron nitride; Ov-POSS—octavinyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane; MMT—montmorillonite; NA—not available.
Conditions of photo-crosslinking of linear and star PLA low molecular weight (co)polymers and observed results. UV light was used to induce crosslinking (visible or laser light/2PP, when indicated).
| PLA Structure (Mn, g·mol−1) | Crosslinking Group | Photoinitiator | Gel Content a, % | Achieved Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDLLA- | Acrylate end group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 65–74 | Degradation rate increased with increasing Mn of precursor; | [ |
| PDLLA- | Fumarate end group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | >90 | Hydrogels prepared in N-vinylpyrrolidone were used for the study of model protein release; the degradation behavior could | [ |
| PDLLA- | Acrylate end group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenyl acetophenone | Preparation of porous scaffolds for the study of the growth factor encapsulation and release and implantation in the case of cranial defect. | [ | |
| PDLLA- | Acrylate end group | camphorquinone/ethyl-4- | 89–100 | Modification of hydrophobicity (contact angle 123°–142°); Tg = 1.8–26 °C depending on the composition and crosslinking density; tensile modulus in the range 0.92–3.67 MPa and strain at break 0.19–0.65; preparation of scaffolds with various pore sizes by salt-leaching method. | [ |
| PDLLA- | Acrylate end group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 78–100 | Both lower crosslinking density (higher Mn of macromer) and the lower crystallinity (lower Mn) increased the degradation rate of the networks; the maximum improvement in penetration force, lubricant property, over control was 41% in the needle coated with PPG-based polymer network. | [ |
| PDLLA- | Acrylate end group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 93–99 | ||
| PDLLA- | Acrylate end group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 95–97 | ||
| PDLLA- | Methacrylate end group | camphorquinone/ethyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate | Highly | Decrease of Tg with increasing CL content (Tg in the range −30 to 60 °C). Storage moduli in the glassy regime were similar, in the rubbery regime dependent on crosslinking density; highly cross-linked scaffolds were cellularly compatible and promoted osteoblast attachment. | [ |
| P(CL- | Acrylate end group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | >95 | Increase of Tg of 2.8–14.9 °C, similar ultimate strength (σ = 2.39–3.76 MPa); Young’s modulus (E = 1.66–12.29 MPa and maximum strain (ε = 21–176%); Excellent biocompatibility of films with smooth muscle cells. | [ |
| P(LDLA-co-GA)-b-PEG-b- P(LDLA-co-GA) | Itaconic end groups | camphorquinone | 94–98 b | Swelling properties depended on crosslinking time, thus crosslinking density; with longer UV exposure better hydrolytic stability of hydrogel was observed. | [ |
| P(DLLA- | Methacrylate end group | Irgacure 2959 | 74–90 | Depending on the DLLA /TMC ratio, amorphous networks with Tg of 13 to 51 °C and elastic modulus from 3.6 MPa to 2.7 GPa were obtained; | [ |
| 2,3- and 6-arm PDLLA | Methacrylate end group | 2-hydroxy-1-[4- | 96 | Tg (55–76 °C) dependent on macromer chain length; mechanical properties similar to HMW PDLLA- suitable for stereolithography; mouse pre-osteoblasts readily adhered and proliferated well on networks. | [ |
| 3-arm P(TMC- | Fumaric acid monoethyl ester | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 67–81c | The E modulus decrease with TMC content, tensile strength and elongation at break unaffected. Relative low values of tensile strength (1–2 MPa), and E modulus (1–10 MPa) in comparison with HMW PDLLA and PTMC. | [ |
| 4-arm PDLLA- | Acrylate end group | 1-hydroxycyclohexylphenylketone | NA | Fabrication of microstructures by soft lithography. Possibility of using studied materials to culture mammalian cells. | [ |
| 4-arm P(LLA-b-CL) | Methacrylate end group | Camphorquinone d | NA | Transition temperatures depended on the length of poly-CL segments. Decrease of Tm and crystallinity with increasing Mn. | [ |
| 3-arm P(CL- | Acrylate end group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | >95 | Tg of elastomers below physiological temperature (even below 0 °C). | [ |
| 3-arm | Acrylate end group and co-photo-crosslinker poly(ethylene glycol)diacrylate (PEGDA) | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 95–98 | Tg, Tm and ∆Hf varied with prepolymer Mn, co-photo-crosslinker amount and Mn. Networks without PEGDA were amorphous, with PEGDA indicated melting; | [ |
| 3-arm | Acrylate end group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 79–88 | With increasing amount of DLLA increase of Young’s, stress at break, Tg and decrease of elongation at break. | [ |
| 3-arm poly(TMC-DLLA-CL) (2300–7800) | Acrylate end group and co-photo-crosslinker poly(ethylene glycol)diacrylate (PEGDA) | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 86–99 | Tg (−18 to 2 °C) varied with the monomer composition and the Mn of PEGDA. | [ |
| Poly(LLA-co- CL-acryolyl carbonate) | Pendant acrylate group | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 90 | Preparation of fibrous scaffolds by melt electrospinning writing; Stiffness of the scaffolds increased significantly (up to ∼10-fold) after crosslinking with UV compared with un-crosslinked scaffolds; the preservation of stiffness upon repetitive loading. | [ |
| Poly(L-lactide-co-acryolyl carbonate) (55,900–72,100) | Pendant acrylate group | NA | 84–94 | Increase of Tg, decrease of Tm and degree of crystallinity after crosslinking; Electrospun and photo-crosslinked polymer resulted in scaffolds with increased tensile modulus in comparison with uncrosslinked fibrous scaffolds; good cytocompatibility toward fibroblasts of crimp-stabilized scaffolds. | [ |
| 3-arm Poly(DLLA-co-CL) (Mw 4800–10,900) | Acrylate end group and co-photo-crosslinker N-methacrylated glycol chitosan (MGC) | Irgacure 2959 | 98–100 | Preparation of bi-continuous two-phase (elastomer /hydrogel) cell delivery device for the repair and/or replacement of load-bearing soft tissues. | [ |
| 3-arm | Acrylate end group and co-photo-crosslinker diacrylate oligo( | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | >95 | Enhancing the degradation rate by introducing PEG fragment; regulation of the degradation rate and peptide release by Mn of PEG and Mn of prepolymer. | [ |
| 4-arm | Methacrylate end group (methacrylic anhydride or 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate) | 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone | 90–99 | Increasing of Tg with decreasing Mn of precursors; networks based on low Mn oligomers were generally more rigid, those based on high Mn exhibited higher elongation; mechanical properties differ with type of precursors methacrylate end group. | [ |
| PDLLA | Methacrylate end group | Camphorquinone/ N,N’-dimethylaminoethyl | 77–100 | Tg (38–55 °C), flexural strength (3.5–94 MPa) and flexural modulus (75-3980 MPa) were dependent on composition of polymer resin and an amount of HA; increasing thermal stability with increasing amount of filler. | [ |
| 4-arm Poly( | Methacrylate end group | 4,4′-bis(dimethylamino)benzophenone e | NA | Preparation of scaffolds with Young’s modulus even bigger than 4 GPa for the mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation; | [ |
| 4-arm Poly(L-lactide) | Methacrylate end group | Irgacure 369 e | NA | Preparation of scaffolds for supporting Schwann cell growth—neural scaffolds in nerve repair. | [ |
| Poly(LLA-co-GMA) | Pendant methacrylate group | Camphorquinone/ N,N′-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate | 72–95 | With increasing content of GMA (9.5–19.2 mol%) the increase of gel content, compressive stress (3–25.5 MPa) and the decrease of degree of swelling was observed; Increase of Tg by 15–20 °C in comparison with original copolymer. | [ |
| PLLA | - | Benzophenone | 38–98.5 | Slight increase of Tg in comparison with pristine PLA, decrease of Tm and crystallinity; improvement of thermal stability; with increase of gel fraction—increase of storage modulus (from 5.4 to 9.6 GPa at 0 °C), tensile strength (from 48 to 81 MPa), modulus (from 1.8 to 3.1 GPa), toughness (from 67 to 82 MPa) and decrease of strain (from 3.9 to 1.6%). | [ |
| PLLA - | Pendant 3-phenylprop-2-ene group | - | 50–100 | Slight increase of Tg (from 50 to 53 °C), decrease of crystallinity (from 10 to 3 %), slight decreases of Tm, thermal decomposition Td, increase of ultimate tensile strength (from 13 to 23 MPa), decrease in elongation (from 12 to 5.2%), increase of Young’s modulus E (from 483 to 830 MPa); Decrease of degradation rate. | [ |
| PLLA- diacyl of | Main-chain 3-phenylprop-2-ene group | - | 9–86 | Increase of Tg (from 51 to 53 °C); decrease of ∆Hm (from 4.8 to 0.1 J.g−1), small decrease of Tm (from 150 to 147 °C), increase of thermal decomposition Td; increase of tensile strength and tensile modulus and decrease of elongation at break with increasing photocuring time and gel content; decrease of degradation rate. | [ |
| P(LLA-co-MC) | Pendant phenylprop-2-ene group | - | NA | The kinetic of UV crosslinking was studied by FT IR spectroscopy. | [ |
| PLA50-Pluronic®-PLA50 | -C-H- bond in polymer chain | Aryl-azide group | Up to 55 | Preparation of elastic microfibers (elastic limit– | [ |
a Gel content was dependent on Mn and/or copolymer composition; b determined by conversion of double bonds; c gel content was dependent on increasing UV energy and photoinitiator concentration; d visible light; e two-photon polymerization technique (2PP); f Mn of the polycondensation product; PPG—poly(propylene glycol); PTMG—poly(tretramethylene glycol); TMC – 1,3-methylene carbonate (1,3-dioxan-2-one); TEGDMA—triethylene glycol dimethacrylate; MC—5-methyl-5-cinnamoyloxymethyl-1,3-dioxan-2-one; GMA—glycidyl methacrylate; NA—data not available.
Figure 3The proposed mechanism of photo-crosslinking of not functionalized PLA in the presence of benzophenone [78]. (Reproduced with permission from Wiley, 2013).
Figure 4Cyclodimerization of cinnamoyl groups.
Figure 5Compounds used for polycondensation with PLA diols.
Figure 6Mechanism of the formation of covalent bond between species bearing azide group and the compound with reactive hydrogen.
Figure 7PLLA crosslinked by electron beam irradiation (50 kGy). (A) shrinkable tube (a); possible use (b). (B) Appearance of cups after using for hot water: (a) the unirradiated product, (b) the product crosslinked by irradiation [31]. (Adapted with permission from Elsevier, 2005).
Figure 8SEM images of preparation methods on elastomer scaffold structure: (a) scaffold made using only paraffin microbeads, (b) scaffold prepared using only water emulsified in the polymer solution, (c) scaffold prepared with combined emulsion and paraffin microbeads [91]. (Adapted with permission from Elsevier, 2009).
Figure 9Images of PDLLA network scaffolds with a gyroid architecture prepared by stereolithography: (A) photograph, (B) microcomputed tomography (µCT) visualization and (C) SEM image. In (D) a light microscopy image is shown for a scaffold seeded with mouse pre-osteoblasts after 1 d of culturing. Scale bars represent 500 µm [57]. (With permission from Elsevier, 2009).
Figure 10Topography images of crossing lines generated by direct laser writing using a formulation comprising the macromonomer: (a) linear-YNE and (b) star-YNE PLAs, both with a stoichiometric amount of the thiol (stoichiometry alkyne/thiol 1:2) and 3 wt % of photoinitiator. Images were obtained using a confocal microscope [107]. (Adapted with permission from Elsevier, 2017).
Figure 11SEM images of porous structures with Schwarz primitive pore network architecture prepared by stereolithography from PDLLA and nano-HAP composite resins containing 5 wt % nano-HAP. Scale bars 200 µm [108]. (Adapted with permission from Elsevier, 2013).
Figure 12(a) Micrographs of a 2PP-fabricated PLA scaffold, (b) fluorescence of PLA scaffolds after implantation into mice; MSC—mesenchymal stem cell [71]. (Adapted from Future Medicine, 2016).