Total Synthesis of Cyclopiamide A Using Palladium-Catalyzed Domino Cyclization.

Total synthesis of cyclopiamide A was accomplished using a palladium-catalyzed domino cyclization. Three rings in the tetracyclic skeleton of cyclopiamide A were constructed in a one-step domino reaction incorporating double carbopalladation and C-H activation.

1. Introduction

Cyclopiamide A (1) was first isolated from Penicillium cyclopium in 1990 by Holzapfel and coworkers (Figure 1) [1]. The isolation of nine cyclopiamide derivatives (cyclopiamide B–J) was recently reported [2,3]. All of the isolated compounds showed moderate toxicity (LD50 = 14.1~38.5 μg/mL) in brine shrimp assays. Despite the unique tetracyclic skeleton of cyclopiamide A (1), synthetic efforts for 1 were rarely reported. In 2018, the first and only report of total synthesis of cyclopiamide A (1) was published by Wood and coworkers [4]. As part of our ongoing efforts to develop novel synthetic methods for 3-methyleneoxindole derivatives [5,6,7,8,9], we describe herein the synthesis of cyclopiamide A (1) featuring rapid and efficient construction of the tetracyclic ring system via a palladium-catalyzed domino reaction.

Figure 1

Cyclopiamide A (1) and its derivatives.

Retrosynthetically, we hypothesized that the tetracyclic system of cyclopiamide A (1) may be accessed from diyne 2 via palladium-catalyzed domino cyclization (Scheme 1). The key intermediate 2 would be synthesized by amide formation between amine groups of aniline 3 and propargylamine 6, and acetylenedicarboxylic acid (4) or propiolic acid (5).

Scheme 1

Retrosynthetic analysis of cyclopiamide A (1).

2. Results and Discussion

Our total synthesis of cyclopiamide A (1) began with the synthesis of the key intermediate diyne 2 (Scheme 2). We first examined the feasibility of monoamide formation between acetylenedicarboxylic acid (4) and aniline 3. The synthesis of monoamides from 4 has been only rarely reported and reaction yields were poor [10]. However, several synthetic methods for creating a symmetric diamide from 4 were recently reported using EDCI (1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylamino-propyl)carbodiimide) and DMTMM (4-(4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholinium chloride) [11,12]. We therefore examined coupling reactions with EDCI and DMTMM, along with other general coupling reagents (DCC (N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide) and PyBOP (benzotriazol-1 -yl-oxytripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate)). Unfortunately, none of these reactions afforded the desired amide 7, probably due to competing decarboxylation and/or 1,4-addition, which are known side reactions in the formation of amides/esters from acetylenedicarboxylic acid [13]. Reactions incorporating other derivatives of 4, such as the monoester, acid chloride, and mixed anhydride, were also evaluated, but none yielded 7. Even when the coupling amine was changed from aniline 3 to propargylamine 6, the corresponding monoamide was not produced. We then used Overman’s stepwise approach [14] to synthesize the unsymmetric diamide of 4. Although this approach took longer, it was a more robust way of creating diyne 2. Thus, the known propiolamide 8 was prepared by DCC coupling of aniline 3 and propiolic acid (5), followed by methylation of the corresponding amide with NaH and MeI [15]. The carboxylic acid group was successfully introduced to 8 using Overman’s method (lithiation of the terminal alkyne and CO2 quenching) to afford monoamide 9. Formation of the second amide was more problematic than expected, since Overman’s EDCI coupling condition was not effective with our substrate 9, giving only trace amounts of the desired diyne 2. After testing several coupling conditions, we found that Roussi’s mixed anhydride method [16] was suitable for our purposes. Thus, carboxylic acid 9 was transformed to the corresponding mixed anhydride using a strong metal base (NaH) and ClCO2Et. Addition of propargylamine 6 to the mixed anhydride produced the desired diyne 2 in 76% yield.

Scheme 2

Preparation of the key intermediate diyne 2.

Using the key intermediate diyne 2, we determined the conditions needed for palladium-catalyzed domino cyclization of 2 to complete the total synthesis of cyclopiamide A (1) (Scheme 3). Under several of the evaluated sets of conditions, desired product 1 was not produced within an unidentifiable mixture of by-products. A literature search for similar domino intramolecular carbopalladation systems ending with the C-H activation of alkyne substrates revealed that an internal alkyne is essential for successful transformation [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Therefore, the terminal alkyne group of 2 was protected with a silyl group using LiHMDS and TBDMSCl to obtain the internal alkyne 10 in 80% yield. Our efforts to optimize the domino cyclization conditions to obtain 10 are detailed in Table 1. Under our optimized conditions, diyne 10 was smoothly transformed into the tetracyclic compound 11 in 40% yield. The total synthesis of cyclopiamide A (1) was completed after deprotection of the TBDMS group of 11 by TBAF (93% yield).

Scheme 3

Domino cyclization and total synthesis of cyclopiamide A (1).

Table 1

Optimization of domino cyclization reaction of 10 1.

Entry	PdCatalyst	PhosphineLigand	Base	Temp(°C)	Time(h)	Yield (%) 2
1	Pd(OAc)2	PPh3	NaOAc	60	3	29
2	Pd(OAc)2	PPh3	NaOAc	rt	24	23
3	Pd(OAc)2	PPh3	NaOAc	100	1	27
4	Pd(OAc)2	–	NaOAc	60	2	20
5	Pd(OAc)2	dppf	NaOAc	60	2	29
6	Pd(OAc)2	P(o-tol)3	NaOAc	100	21	18
7 3	Pd(OAc)2	t-BuXPhos	NaOAc	60	3	21
8 3	Pd(OAc)2	PPh3	NaOAc	60	3.5	31
9 3	Pd(OAc)2	PPh3	K2CO3	60	3	24
10 3	Pd(OAc)2	PPh3	K3PO4	60	4	31
11 3	Pd(OAc)2	PPh3	Cs2CO3	60	3	16
12 3	Pd(PPh3)4	PPh3	NaOAc	60	4	30
13	Pd(PPh3)4	–	NaOAc	60	4	35
14 4	Pd(PPh3)4	–	NaOAc	60	4.5	40

1 Reaction conditions: 10 (1.0 eq), Pd catalyst (10 mol%), phosphine ligand (20 mol%), base (3 eq), DMF (0.05 M), temp (°C), time (h). 2 Isolated yield. 3 30 mol% of phosphine ligand was used. 4 20 mol% of Pd catalyst was used.

Initially, diyne 10 was exposed to general conditions [Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%), PPh3 (20 mol%), NaOAc (3.0 eq), DMF, 60 °C, 3 h], which afforded the cyclized product 11 as the only isolable product in 29% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Raising or lowering the reaction temperature did not improve the yield, but did affect the reaction rate (Entries 2 and 3). To examine ligand effects, the reaction was performed without ligand (Entry 4) and with other phosphine ligands (Entries 5–7). None of these reactions gave greater yields than that obtained with PPh3. When the amount of PPh3 was increased to 30 mol%, the yield of the reaction increased only slightly to 31% (Entry 8). Several other bases were also evaluated, but all gave similar or inferior results (Entries 9–11). Changing the catalyst from Pd(OAc)2 to Pd(PPh3)4 resulted in a similar yield of 30% (Entry 12). Interestingly, in the case of Pd(PPh3)4, the reaction without phosphine ligand provided 11 in a slightly higher yield (35%) (Entry 13). Increasing the catalyst load to 20 mol% afforded the desired cyclized product 11 in 40% yield (Entry 14).

Mechanistically, our palladium-catalyzed domino reaction can be depicted as shown in Scheme 4. Oxidative addition of an active Pd(0) catalyst into C-I bond of 10 gives the aryl palladium intermediate 12, which is converted in turn to 13 and 14 through double 5-exo-dig cyclocarbopalladations. The proximity of Pd and aryl C-H in 14 facilitates C-H activation to give intermediate 15, which is then transformed into 11 by reductive elimination.

Scheme 4

Proposed catalytic cycle for domino cyclization.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Information

All reactions were performed under an argon atmosphere with dry solvents, unless otherwise stated. Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) and methylene chloride (CH2Cl2) were obtained from Ultimate Solvent Purification System (JC Meyer Solvent System, Laguna Beach, CA, USA). Other dry solvents were purchased as anhydrous grade. All commercially available reagents were purchased and used without further purification. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel plates (Merck TLC Silica Gel 60 F254, Darmstadt, Germany) using UV light, PMA (an ethanolic solution of phosphomolybdic acid), or ANIS (an ethanolic solution of para-anisaldehyde) as visualizing agent. Purification of products was conducted by column chromatography through silica gel 60 (0.060−0.200 mm). Melting points of all solid compounds were determined by Buchi M-565. IR spectra were recorded on a Jasco P-2000 FT-IR spectrometer (JASCO Inc., Easton, MD, USA). NMR spectra were obtained on Bruker AVANCE III 500 MHz (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) using residual undeuterated solvent or TMS (tetramethylsilane) as an internal reference. Copies of all NMR spectra are provided as Supplementary Materials for this article. High-resolution mass spectra (HR-MS) were recorded on a Agilant 6530 Q-TOF (Agilant, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using FAB (fast atom bombardment) or a JEOL JMS-700 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) using EI (electron impact).

3.2. Synthesis of , and –

N-(2-Iodophenyl)-N-methylpropiolamide (8) [15,23]: To a stirred solution of 2-iodoaniline (3) (500 mg, 2.28 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in CH2Cl2 (22 mL) and propiolic acid (5) (0.18 mL, 2.97 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) was added dicyclohexylcarbodimide (DCC, 612 mg, 2.97 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) at 0 °C. Then, the temperature was gradually raised to 25 °C over 30 min. The mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 3 h and diluted with EtOAc (100 mL). Organic layer was washed with 2 M aqueous HCl (30 mL × 2) and sat. aqueous NaHCO3 (30 mL × 2). The organic layer was separated, dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexanes:EtOAc = 6:1) to give N-(2-iodophenyl)propiolamide [15,23] (531 mg, 86%) as a white solid (mp = 103.7 °C). IR (film) 3288, 2107, 1662, 1515, 1432 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.18 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (brs, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.01 (s, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 149.7, 139.1, 137.5, 129.5, 126.9, 122.5, 89.6, 77.5, 74.8 ppm.; To a stirred suspension of NaH (60% in mineral oil, 66.0 mg, 1.66 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) in THF (7.0 mL) was added a solution of the previously prepared N-(2-iodophenyl)-propiolamide (408 mg, 1.51 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in THF (8.0 mL) at 0 °C. After 30 min stirring, MeI (103 μL, 1.66 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) was added dropwise at the same temperature. Then, the temperature was gradually raised to 25 °C. The mixture was stirred for additional 3 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with sat. aqueous NH4Cl (30 mL × 2). The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexanes:EtOAc = 4:1) to give N-methylpropiolamide 8 (369 mg, 86%) as a white solid (mp = 101.0 °C (lit. [24] 101–102 °C)). IR (film) 3213, 2103, 1633, 1467, 1377 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 8:1 atropisomeric mixture, major peaks): δ = 7.93 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (ddd, J = 8.7, 7.6, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (ddd, J = 9.1, 7.7, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 3.23 (s, 3H), 2.74 (s, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 153.2, 145.1, 140.1, 130.5, 129.8, 129.7, 99.5, 79.1, 76.3, 35.5 ppm.

4-((2-Iodophenyl)(methyl)amino)-4-oxobut-2-ynoic acid (9): To a solution of N-methylpropiolamide 8 (369 mg, 1.29 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in THF (12 mL) was added LiHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 1.55 mL, 1.55 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) dropwise at −78 °C. The resulting solution was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h. Then, CO2 gas (dry ice) was bubbled through the solution for 30 min. Then, the reaction flask was opened and allowed to warm to room temperature. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. To the residue H2O (30 mL) and hexane (15 mL) were added. The aqueous layer was separated, acidified with 2 M aqueous HCl to pH 1~2 and then extracted with EtOAc (20 mL × 3). The organic layers were combined, dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to give acid 9 (425 mg, 100%) as off white solid (mp = 125.4 °C). The crude 9 was used for the next step without further purification. IR (film) 3057, 2924, 1719, 1650, 1265, 735 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 7:1 atropisomeric mixture, major peaks): δ = 8.85 (brs, 1H), 7.94 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (td, J = 7.7, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (td, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 153.7, 152.6, 143.6, 140.4, 131.2, 130.1, 129.5, 98.9, 80.2, 77.2, 36.0 ppm; HRMS (FAB): calcd. for C11H9INO3 [M + H+]: 329.9627, found 329.9625.

N (2): To a stirred suspension of NaH (60% in mineral oil, 76.0 mg, 1.91 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) in THF (5.0 mL) was added a solution of acid 9 (420 mg, 1.28 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in THF (7.0 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was slowly warmed up to room temperature and stirred for 2 h. After addition of ethyl chloroformate (180 μL, 1.91 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h. And then 1,1-dimethylpropargylamine (6) (107 μL, 1.02 mmol, 0.8 equiv.) was added and stirring was continued for another 30 min. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was diluted with EtOAc (50 mL). The mixture was washed with sat. aqueous NaHCO3 (20 mL × 2) and the organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexanes:EtOAc = 2:1) to give diyne 2 (308 mg, 76%) as a white solid (mp = 123.5 °C). IR (film) 3294, 3260, 1662, 1626, 1529, 1387, 1278 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 6:1 atropisomeric mixture): δ = 7.95 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H, major), 7.91 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H, minor), 7.46 (td, J = 7.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H, major), 7.42 (td, J = 7.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H, minor), 7.33 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H, major), 7.21 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H, minor), 7.14 (td, J = 7.8, 1.6 Hz, 1H, major), 7.07 (td, J = 7.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H, minor), 6.27 (brs, 1H, minor), 5.78 (brs, 1H, major), 3.50 (s, 3H, minor), 3.25 (s, 3H, major), 2.42 (s, 1H, minor), 2.34 (s, 1H, major), 1.69 (s, 6H, minor), 1.57 (s, 6H, major) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 152.6 (major), 152.4 (minor), 150.1 (minor), 149.8 (major), 144.2 (major), 143.5 (minor), 140.3 (major), 140.2 (minor), 131.0 (major), 130.2 (minor), 130.0 (major), 129.7 (major), 128.4 (minor), 99.2 (major), 97.3 (minor), 85.83 (major), 85.78 (minor), 83.3 (minor), 82.5 (major), 74.4 (major), 74.1 (minor), 70.4 (minor), 70.2 (major), 49.0 (minor), 48.9 (major), 39.3 (minor), 35.8 (major), 28.8 (minor), 28.70 (major), 28.68 (major) ppm; HRMS (FAB): calcd. for C16H16IN2O2 [M + H+]: 395.0256, found 395.0259.

N (10): To a stirred solution of diyne 2 (295 mg, 0.748 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) in THF (7.5 mL) was added LiHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 2.24 mL, 2.24 mmol, 3.0 equiv.) at −78 °C. After 1 h TBDMSCl (338 mg, 2.24 mmol, 3.0 equiv.) was added and the temperature was gradually raised to room temperature. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was diluted with EtOAc (50 mL) and was washed with H2O (20 mL × 2). The organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexanes:EtOAc = 3:1) to give TBDMS-protected diamide 10 (304 mg, 80%) as a white solid (mp = 101.1 °C). IR (film) 3261, 1678, 1644, 1535, 1470, 830 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 6:1 atropisomeric mixture): δ = 7.94 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H, major), 7.91 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.1 Hz, 1H, minor), 7.45 (td, J = 7.7, 1.2 Hz, 1H, major), 7.42 (td, J = 7.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H, minor), 7.33 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H, major), 7.21 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H, minor), 7.14 (td, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H, major), 7.08 (td, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H, minor), 6.21 (brs, 1H, minor), 5.77 (brs, 1H, major), 3.50 (s, 3H, minor), 3.25 (s, 3H, major), 1.69 (s, 6H, minor), 1.57 (s, 6H, major), 0.94 (s, 9H, minor), 0.91 (s, 9H, major), 0.11 (s, 6H, minor), 0.08 (s, 6H, major) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 152.7 (major), 152.4 (minor), 149.8 (minor), 149.5 (major), 144.3 (major), 143.5 (minor), 140.30 (minor), 140.28 (major), 130.9 (major), 130.3 (minor), 130.04 (minor), 130.02 (major), 129.7 (major), 128.4 (minor), 108.6 (major), 108.3 (minor), 99.2 (major), 97.3 (minor), 85.0 (minor), 84.8 (major), 83.5 (minor), 82.7 (major), 74.1 (major), 73.9 (minor), 50.4 (minor), 50.2 (major), 39.3 (minor), 35.7 (major), 28.7 (minor), 28.5 (major), 28.4 (major), 26.18 (minor), 26.17 (major), 16.7 (minor), 16.6 (major), −4.57 (minor), −4.59 (major) ppm; HRMS (FAB): calcd. for C22H30IN2O2Si [M + H+]: 509.1121, found 509.1118.

6-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)-2,7,7-trimethyl-7,8-dihydro-1H-isoindolo[4,5,6-cd]indole-1,9(2H)-dione (11): To a solution of TBDMS-protected diamide 10 (50.0 mg, 98.3 μmol, 1.0 equiv.) in DMF (2.0 mL) was added Pd(PPh3)4 (22.6 mg, 19.7 μmol, 20 mol%) and NaOAc (24.0 mg, 295 μmol, 3.0 equiv.). The reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 4.5 h, and then cooled to room temperature. The mixture was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with H2O (10 mL × 3). The organic layer was then dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, CH2Cl2:MeOH = 15:1) to give 11 (15.0 mg, 40%) as an orange solid (mp = 309.1 °C). IR(film) 3037, 2854, 2352, 1721, 1627, 1187 767, 687 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.02 (brs, 1H), 7.95 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (dd, J = 9.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (s, 3H), 1.82 (s, 6H), 0.97 (s, 9H), 0.77 (s, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 165.7, 165.3, 159.5, 142.0, 137.3, 137.2, 129.6, 128.3, 125.6, 124.8, 124.0, 104.0, 62.2, 29.8, 29.5, 26.4, 19.2, 5.6 ppm; HRMS (EI): calcd. for C22H28N2O2Si [M+]: 380.1920, found 380.1921.

Cyclopiamide A (1): To a stirred solution of 11 (14.0 mg, 36.8 μmol, 1.0 equiv.) in THF (1 mL) was added TBAF (1.0 M solution in THF, 0.15 mL, 0.15 mmol, 4.0 equiv.) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2.5 h, diluted with EtOAc (20 mL) and washed with sat. aqueous NH4Cl (10 mL × 2). Organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, CH2Cl2:MeOH = 15:1) to give cyclopiamide A (1) (9.1 mg, 93%) as a yellow solid (mp = 251.8 °C). IR (film) 3519, 3072, 1707, 1636, 1497, 1390, 1046, 768 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.97 (s, 1H), 7.55 (m, 2H), 7.16 (brs, 1H), 6.88 (m, 1H), 3.46 (s, 3H), 1.68 (s, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.7, 165.5, 153.6, 141.7, 131.0, 130.4, 129.2, 125.8, 124.2, 122.8, 120.2, 104.6, 59.9, 28.8, 26.5 ppm; HRMS (FAB): calcd. for C16H15N2O2 [M + H+]: 267.1134, found 267.1137.

4. Conclusions

The total synthesis of cyclopiamide A (1) was accomplished with an overall yield of 16.7% using a concise seven-step method. The tetracyclic skeleton of 1 was efficiently obtained in a single step through a palladium-catalyzed domino reaction combining double cyclocarbopalladation and C-H activation. We are currently exploring the synthesis of other cyclopiamide derivatives using this strategy.