Vanessa Lattimore1, Michael T Parsons2, Amanda B Spurdle2, John Pearson3, Klaus Lehnert4, Jan Sullivan5, Caroline Lintott5, Suzannah Bawden5, Helen Morrin6,7, Bridget Robinson6,8, Logan Walker6. 1. Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. vanessa.lattimore@otago.ac.nz. 2. Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 3. Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. 4. Centre for Brain Research and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 5. Genetic Health Service NZ, South Island Hub, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand. 6. Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. 7. Cancer Society Tissue Bank, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. 8. Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic screening for pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, PTEN and TP53, may be offered to New Zealanders from suspected high-risk breast (and ovarian) cancer families. However, it is unknown how many high-risk pathogenic variant carriers in New Zealand are not offered genetic screening using existing triage tools and guidelines for breast (and ovarian) cancer patients. METHODS: Panel-gene sequencing of the coding and non-coding regions of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, and the coding regions and splice sites of CDH1, PALB2, PTEN and TP53, was undertaken for an unselected cohort of 367 female breast cancer patients. A total of 1685 variants were evaluated using the ENIGMA and the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines. RESULTS: Our study identified that 13 (3.5%) breast cancer patients carried a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, or PTEN. A significantly higher number of pathogenic variant carriers had grade 3 tumours (10/13) when compared to non-carriers; however, no other clinicopathological characteristics were found to be significantly different between (likely) pathogenic variant carriers and non-carriers, nor between variant of unknown significance carriers and non-carriers. Notably, 46% of the identified (likely) pathogenic variant carriers had not been referred for a genetic assessment and consideration of genetic testing. CONCLUSION: Our study shows a potential under-ascertainment of women carrying a (likely) pathogenic variant in a high-risk breast cancer susceptibility gene. These results suggest that further research into testing pathways for New Zealand breast cancer patients may be required to reduce the impact of hereditary cancer syndromes for these individuals and their families.
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic screening for pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, PTEN and TP53, may be offered to New Zealanders from suspected high-risk breast (and ovarian) cancer families. However, it is unknown how many high-risk pathogenic variant carriers in New Zealand are not offered genetic screening using existing triage tools and guidelines for breast (and ovarian) cancerpatients. METHODS: Panel-gene sequencing of the coding and non-coding regions of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, and the coding regions and splice sites of CDH1, PALB2, PTEN and TP53, was undertaken for an unselected cohort of 367 female breast cancerpatients. A total of 1685 variants were evaluated using the ENIGMA and the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines. RESULTS: Our study identified that 13 (3.5%) breast cancerpatients carried a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, or PTEN. A significantly higher number of pathogenic variant carriers had grade 3 tumours (10/13) when compared to non-carriers; however, no other clinicopathological characteristics were found to be significantly different between (likely) pathogenic variant carriers and non-carriers, nor between variant of unknown significance carriers and non-carriers. Notably, 46% of the identified (likely) pathogenic variant carriers had not been referred for a genetic assessment and consideration of genetic testing. CONCLUSION: Our study shows a potential under-ascertainment of women carrying a (likely) pathogenic variant in a high-risk breast cancer susceptibility gene. These results suggest that further research into testing pathways for New Zealand breast cancerpatients may be required to reduce the impact of hereditary cancer syndromes for these individuals and their families.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; New Zealand; Panel gene; Variant classification
Authors: Xiaohong R Yang; Beena C R Devi; Hyuna Sung; Jennifer Guida; Eliseos J Mucaki; Yanzi Xiao; Ana Best; Lisa Garland; Yi Xie; Nan Hu; Maria Rodriguez-Herrera; Chaoyu Wang; Kristine Jones; Wen Luo; Belynda Hicks; Tieng Swee Tang; Karobi Moitra; Peter K Rogan; Michael Dean Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Nilah M Ioannidis; Joseph H Rothstein; Vikas Pejaver; Sumit Middha; Shannon K McDonnell; Saurabh Baheti; Anthony Musolf; Qing Li; Emily Holzinger; Danielle Karyadi; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; Craig C Teerlink; Janet L Stanford; William B Isaacs; Jianfeng Xu; Kathleen A Cooney; Ethan M Lange; Johanna Schleutker; John D Carpten; Isaac J Powell; Olivier Cussenot; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Graham G Giles; Robert J MacInnis; Christiane Maier; Chih-Lin Hsieh; Fredrik Wiklund; William J Catalona; William D Foulkes; Diptasri Mandal; Rosalind A Eeles; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Carlos D Bustamante; Daniel J Schaid; Trevor Hastie; Elaine A Ostrander; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Predrag Radivojac; Stephen N Thibodeau; Alice S Whittemore; Weiva Sieh Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Amanda B Spurdle; Sue Healey; Andrew Devereau; Frans B L Hogervorst; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Katherine L Nathanson; Paolo Radice; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Sean Tavtigian; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Fergus J Couch; David E Goldgar Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Cornelia Kraus; Juliane Hoyer; Georgia Vasileiou; Marius Wunderle; Michael P Lux; Peter A Fasching; Mandy Krumbiegel; Steffen Uebe; Miriam Reuter; Matthias W Beckmann; André Reis Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Ranjit Manchanda; Shreeya Patel; Vladimir S Gordeev; Antonis C Antoniou; Shantel Smith; Andrew Lee; John L Hopper; Robert J MacInnis; Clare Turnbull; Susan J Ramus; Simon A Gayther; Paul D P Pharoah; Usha Menon; Ian Jacobs; Rosa Legood Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sanjeewa Seneviratne; Ross Lawrenson; Vernon Harvey; Reena Ramsaroop; Mark Elwood; Nina Scott; Diana Sarfati; Ian Campbell Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Jannah Shamsani; Stephen H Kazakoff; Irina M Armean; Will McLaren; Michael T Parsons; Bryony A Thompson; Tracy A O'Mara; Sarah E Hunt; Nicola Waddell; Amanda B Spurdle Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; John L Hopper; Daniel R Barnes; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Thea M Mooij; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Sarah Jervis; Flora E van Leeuwen; Roger L Milne; Nadine Andrieu; David E Goldgar; Mary Beth Terry; Matti A Rookus; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou; Lesley McGuffog; D Gareth Evans; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Julian Adlard; Kai-Ren Ong; Louise Izatt; Marc Tischkowitz; Ros Eeles; Rosemarie Davidson; Shirley Hodgson; Steve Ellis; Catherine Nogues; Christine Lasset; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Laurence Faivre; Pascaline Berthet; Maartje J Hooning; Lizet E van der Kolk; Carolien M Kets; Muriel A Adank; Esther M John; Wendy K Chung; Irene L Andrulis; Melissa Southey; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ana Osorio; Christoph Engel; Karin Kast; Rita K Schmutzler; Trinidad Caldes; Anna Jakubowska; Jacques Simard; Michael L Friedlander; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Eva Machackova; Lenka Foretova; Yen Y Tan; Christian F Singer; Edith Olah; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Brita Arver; Håkan Olsson Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Miguel de la Hoya; Omar Soukarieh; Irene López-Perolio; Ana Vega; Logan C Walker; Yvette van Ierland; Diana Baralle; Marta Santamariña; Vanessa Lattimore; Juul Wijnen; Philip Whiley; Ana Blanco; Michela Raponi; Jan Hauke; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Alexandra Becker; Thomas V O Hansen; Raquel Behar; KConFaB Investigators; Diether Niederacher; Norbert Arnold; Bernd Dworniczak; Doris Steinemann; Ulrike Faust; Wendy Rubinstein; Peter J Hulick; Claude Houdayer; Sandrine M Caputo; Laurent Castera; Tina Pesaran; Elizabeth Chao; Carole Brewer; Melissa C Southey; Christi J van Asperen; Christian F Singer; Jan Sullivan; Nicola Poplawski; Phuong Mai; Julian Peto; Nichola Johnson; Barbara Burwinkel; Harald Surowy; Stig E Bojesen; Henrik Flyger; Annika Lindblom; Sara Margolin; Jenny Chang-Claude; Anja Rudolph; Paolo Radice; Laura Galastri; Janet E Olson; Emily Hallberg; Graham G Giles; Roger L Milne; Irene L Andrulis; Gord Glendon; Per Hall; Kamila Czene; Fiona Blows; Mitul Shah; Qin Wang; Joe Dennis; Kyriaki Michailidou; Lesley McGuffog; Manjeet K Bolla; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Fergus J Couch; Sean Tavtigian; Maaike P Vreeswijk; Michael Parsons; Huong D Meeks; Alexandra Martins; David E Goldgar; Amanda B Spurdle Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Andrew Lee; Nasim Mavaddat; Amber N Wilcox; Alex P Cunningham; Tim Carver; Simon Hartley; Chantal Babb de Villiers; Angel Izquierdo; Jacques Simard; Marjanka K Schmidt; Fiona M Walter; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Marc Tischkowitz; Paul Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou Journal: Genet Med Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 8.822