Literature DB >> 33112982

The microscope drape method to reduce aerosolisation during endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery in the COVID era. How i do it.

Aikaterini Tsagkovits1, Dimitrios Ioannidis2, Ashok Rokade2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Otolaryngologists are faced with concerning challenges since the onset of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic due to significant risk of occupational infection. Transmission can happen during intraoperative exposure to viral particles carried by droplets or aerosols. Endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery are notable for causing aerosolisation, putting healthcare staff at substantial risk.
METHOD: We describe the creation of a tight-seal tent from a microscope drape covering the operative field and the operator's hands with the aim to contain aerosols during transnasal endoscopic surgery.
CONCLUSION: The microscope drape technique is a simple barrier measure that could potentially improve safety during endoscopic procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Endoscopic sinus surgery; FESS; Microscope drape

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33112982      PMCID: PMC7591691          DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06441-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


Background

The 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak poses significant risk to healthcare professionals during the provision of clinical care. Transmission can happen through respiratory droplets and aerosolised viral particles, which can be produced during certain airway procedures, such as intubation and airway suctioning [1, 2]. There have been anecdotal reports of increased number of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases among otolaryngologists worldwide [3]. Endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery are considered high-risk operations for viral shedding and subsequent infection of the operator and the scrub team. This is due to the high viral load in the upper airway of the infected patient, especially in the nose and the nasopharynx, and the aerosol generation that can happen during endonasal instrumentation, such as suctioning, bone drilling and use of microdebrider and bipolar diathermy [4]. Despite the use of enhanced personal protective equipment, there are concerns that SARS-CoV-2 could still be contacted when spread at the wider theatre environment, where it can remain for up to 3 h in aerosolised form [1]. This highlights the need for development and implementation of strategies to minimise aerosol spread in the form of barrier cover, and thus reduce viral exposure during these endoscopic procedures. Here, we present a potential solution to contain the circulating aerosols produced during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in the operating room by the creation of a tent with a surgical otomicroscope drape.

Methods

After general anaesthesia and standard draping, personal protective equipment (PPE) is worn by the surgical team as per guidance. A magnetic mat with the instruments that are expected to be used is placed on the patient’s thorax. An anaesthesia screen (Eshmann Technologies Ltd.©) is placed on the patient’s left side at the level of the midsternum (Fig. 1). An otomicroscope drape (Microtek™ Microscope Mini Drape) is wrapped around the patient’s head and upper torso over the screen and tucked under the surgical bed. Slits are cut at an ergonomic position and the surgeon’s arms are inserted within the tent (Fig. 2). A third slit is made to introduce the endoscopic camera, light source, bipolar, endoscrub and suction cables. All slits are sealed with sterile tape. During the procedure, instruments can be handed over by an assistant from outside of the tent or picked up by the surgeon. At the end of the surgery, doffing is accomplished with the help of an assistant and the microscope drape can be removed at the same time.
Fig. 1

Equipment for the surgical tent: otomicroscope drape, anaesthesia screen (left) and magnetic mat (right)

Fig. 2

Surgical tent setup during simulation

Equipment for the surgical tent: otomicroscope drape, anaesthesia screen (left) and magnetic mat (right) Surgical tent setup during simulation The method was simulated and tested in the operating room with an adult airway manikin before its first application, where the pictures on the figures were taken from. Expert advice was sought by the trust’s research department and special approval and consent were not deemed necessary as the intervention was based on best public health evidence and did not deviate from the standard surgical technique. The surgical tent was used for an urgent examination of the nose under anaesthesia and nasopharyngeal biopsy in an 11-year-old child with a postnasal tumour with unknown COVID-19 status. The procedure was accomplished comfortably without any compromise of vision or hand movements on the surgical field. The patient had an uneventful recovery. Neither the surgeon or any of the healthcare professionals involved in the procedure tested positive for COVID-19 within 14 days of the surgery.

Discussion

We suggest a simple mitigation strategy for containing aerosol generation during endoscopic sinus surgery with readily available equipment in every ENT theatre. The sensitivity of real-time reverse transcription PCR from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab specimens, which is the current practice for preoperative screening, ranges between 63 and 73% [5, 6], rendering the viral detection in surgical patients dubious. Additionally, asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 transmission mandate precautionary measures like that to reduce viral spread [7]. Similar barrier techniques were already proposed and successfully used in other airway procedures during the COVID era, highlighting the fact that ENT surgeons have appreciated the importance of aerosol mitigation during ENT procedures [8-10]. Our method allowed for unrestricted hand movements and there was not any interference in the visualisation of the surgical field e.g., glaring from the plastic transparent cover previously described [8]. Contrary to the covers with open slits or ports, our tight-seal arrangement around the cables and incorporating the surgeon’s arms within the drape ensures minimal aerosol escape [8-10]. We acknowledge that our technique necessitates all the equipment required for the procedure to be placed on the patient’s chest before the application of the drape. The instruments should be carefully chosen in advance and kept at a reasonable number as they are placed on a magnetic mat with dimensions 30 × 40 cm (Purple Surgical ©). Extra temporary storage for instruments could be provided by instrument adhesive pouches secured on the patient’s side. Uncovering the field during the procedure to hand in extra pieces would allow potential aerosol leak and should be avoided. Additional time should be spared to prepare the surgical tent, which must be accounted for anaesthetic and logistic planning purposes. However, preparation time is expected to shorten after practising the technique a few times. Simulating the technique with a manikin is advisable before proceeding with a real patient. The microscope drape technique setup would certainly impact surgical training in endoscopic sinus surgery, as the initial operator should be able to perform the procedure until the end without being able to allocate surgical time to a trainee at any step, which is one of the limitations. The surgical tent is a new method that is evolving and further improvements are being designed. The addition of negative pressure by adding a second suction within the drape could offer additional safety. More sophisticated configurations with isolating chambers within the drape for instrument insertion from the outside without risking aerosol release could be considered. Further experiments with simulated aerosols to assess the effectiveness of the technique would be necessary.
  9 in total

1.  Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.

Authors:  Wenling Wang; Yanli Xu; Ruqin Gao; Roujian Lu; Kai Han; Guizhen Wu; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Pediatric Microlaryngoscopy and Bronchoscopy in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Katherine Pollaers; Hayley Herbert; Shyan Vijayasekaran
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Negative-Pressure Aerosol Cover for COVID-19 Tracheostomy.

Authors:  J Tyler Bertroche; Patrik Pipkorn; Paul Zolkind; Craig A Buchman; Jose P Zevallos
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Alan D Workman; D Bradley Welling; Bob S Carter; William T Curry; Eric H Holbrook; Stacey T Gray; George A Scangas; Benjamin S Bleier
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.858

5.  Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.

Authors:  Roman Wölfel; Victor M Corman; Wolfgang Guggemos; Michael Seilmaier; Sabine Zange; Marcel A Müller; Daniela Niemeyer; Terry C Jones; Patrick Vollmar; Camilla Rothe; Michael Hoelscher; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Rosina Ehmann; Katrin Zwirglmaier; Christian Drosten; Clemens Wendtner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Endoscopic skull base and transoral surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: Minimizing droplet spread with negative-pressure otolaryngology viral isolation drape.

Authors:  Abel P David; Nicole T Jiam; Joshua M Reither; Jose G Gurrola; Manish K Aghi; Ivan H El-Sayed
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality.

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Junji Cao
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1.

Authors:  Neeltje van Doremalen; Trenton Bushmaker; Dylan H Morris; Myndi G Holbrook; Amandine Gamble; Brandi N Williamson; Azaibi Tamin; Jennifer L Harcourt; Natalie J Thornburg; Susan I Gerber; James O Lloyd-Smith; Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Otorhinolaryngologists and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Geraldo Pereira Jotz; Richard Louis Voegels; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-13
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion in otolaryngology specialists.

Authors:  Massimo Ralli; Andrea Colizza; Vittorio D'Aguanno; Alfonso Scarpa; Gennaro Russo; Paolo Petrone; Rosa Grassia; Pierre Guarino; Pasquale Capasso
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.618

2.  Resurgence of mucormycosis during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Kamran Ali; Shiraz Altigani Mohammed Salih
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Cases       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 3.  COVID-19-Associated Mucormycosis: A Matter of Concern Amid the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

Authors:  Pankaj Chandley; Priyanka Subba; Soma Rohatgi
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-06

4.  COVID-19-associated mucormycosis: An updated systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Rimesh Pal; Birgurman Singh; Sanjay Kumar Bhadada; Mainak Banerjee; Ranjitpal Singh Bhogal; Neemu Hage; Ashok Kumar
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.931

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.