Literature DB >> 33112723

The Devil in the Details Can Be Hard to Spot: Malapropisms and Children With Hearing Loss.

Joanna H Lowenstein1, Susan Nittrouer1.   

Abstract

Purpose Better auditory prostheses and earlier interventions have led to remarkable improvements in spoken language abilities for children with hearing loss (HL), but these children often still struggle academically. This study tested a hypothesis for why this may be, proposing that the language of school becomes increasingly disconnected from everyday discourse, requiring greater reliance on bottom-up phonological structure, and children with HL have difficulty recovering that structure from the speech signal. Participants One hundred nineteen fourth graders participated: 48 with normal hearing (NH), 19 with moderate losses who used hearing aids (HAs), and 52 with severe-to-profound losses who used cochlear implants (CIs). Method Three analyses were conducted. #1: Sentences with malapropisms were created, and children's abilities to recognize them were assessed. #2: Factors contributing to those abilities were evaluated, including phonological awareness, phonological processing, vocabulary, verbal working memory, and oral narratives. #3: Teachers' ratings of students' academic competence were obtained, and factors accounting for those ratings were evaluated, including the five listed above, along with word reading and reading comprehension. Results #1: Children with HAs and CIs performed more poorly on malapropism recognition than children with NH, but similarly to each other. #2: All children with HL demonstrated large phonological deficits, but they were especially large for children with CIs. Phonological awareness explained the most variance in malapropism recognition for children with CIs. Vocabulary knowledge explained malapropism recognition for children with NH or HAs, but other factors also contributed. #3: Teachers rated academic competence for children with CIs more poorly than for children with NH or HAs, and variance in those ratings for children with CIs were primarily explained by malapropism scores. Conclusion Children with HL have difficulty recognizing acoustic-phonetic detail in the speech signal, and that constrains their abilities to follow conversations in academic settings, especially if HL is severe enough to require CIs. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13133018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33112723      PMCID: PMC8563107          DOI: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch        ISSN: 0161-1461            Impact factor:   2.983


  38 in total

1.  Phonological awareness, vocabulary, and reading in deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Carol Johnson; Usha Goswami
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Nonword repetition in children with cochlear implants: a potential clinical marker of poor language acquisition.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Emily Sansom; Jill Twersky; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Assessing Higher Order Language Processing in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Reading, writing, and phonological processing skills of adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Heather Hayes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The role of early language experience in the development of speech perception and phonological processing abilities: evidence from 5-year-olds with histories of otitis media with effusion and low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Lisa Thuente Burton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  Long-term speech and language outcomes in prelingually deaf children, adolescents and young adults who received cochlear implants in childhood.

Authors:  Chad V Ruffin; William G Kronenberger; Bethany G Colson; Shirley C Henning; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Verbal Working Memory in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Keri E Low; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Early Literacy Predictors and Second-Grade Outcomes in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Jake Oleson; Sophie E Ambrose; Elizabeth A Walker; Mary P Moeller
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2018-10-09

9.  Development of Phonological, Lexical, and Syntactic Abilities in Children With Cochlear Implants Across the Elementary Grades.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Meganne Muir; Kierstyn Tietgens; Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Psychometric Properties of Language Assessments for Children Aged 4-12 Years: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Deborah Denman; Renée Speyer; Natalie Munro; Wendy M Pearce; Yu-Wei Chen; Reinie Cordier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  The contribution of spectral processing to the acquisition of phonological sensitivity by adolescent cochlear implant users and normal-hearing controls.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Donal G Sinex
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Disparate Oral and Written Language Abilities in Adolescents With Cochlear Implants: Evidence From Narrative Samples.

Authors:  Luke Breland; Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.215

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.