Literature DB >> 33111943

Exploring the Potential of 3D-printing in Biological Education: A Review of the Literature.

Alexandria K Hansen1, Taylor R Langdon1, Lukyon W Mendrin1, Kaylin Peters1, Jose Ramos1, David D Lent1.   

Abstract

Science education is most effective when it provides authentic experiences that reflect professional practices and approaches that address issues relevant to students' lives and communities. Such educational experiences are becoming increasingly interdisciplinary and can be enhanced using digital fabrication. Digital fabrication is the process of designing objects for the purpose of fabricating with machinery such as 3D-printers, laser cutters, and Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines. Historically, these types of tools have been exceptionally costly and difficult to access; however, recent advancements in technological design have been accompanied by decreasing prices. In this review, we first establish the historical and theoretical foundations that support the use of digital fabrication as a pedagogical strategy to enhance learning. We specifically chose to focus attention on 3D-printing because this type of technology is becoming increasingly advanced, affordable, and widely available. We systematically reviewed the last 20 years of literature that characterized the use of 3D-printing in biological education, only finding a total of 13 articles that attempted to investigate the benefits for student learning. While the pedagogical value of student-driven creation is strongly supported by educational literature, it was challenging to make broad claims about student learning in relation to using or creating 3D-printed models in the context of biological education. Additional studies are needed to systematically investigate the impact of student-driven creation at the intersection of biology and engineering or computer science education. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology 2020. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33111943     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icaa100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  4 in total

1.  3D printing lifts the lid on black box instruments.

Authors:  Levi Garza; Michael Jones; Caley B Craven; Charles A Lucy; Eric J Davis
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  3D Printer Particle Emissions: Translation to Internal Dose in Adults and Children.

Authors:  Peter Byrley; William K Boyes; Kim Rogers; Annie M Jarabek
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.586

3.  Eyes Toward Tomorrow Program Enhancing Collaboration, Connections, and Community Using Bioinspired Design.

Authors:  Robert J Full; H A Bhatti; P Jennings; R Ruopp; T Jafar; J Matsui; L A Flores; M Estrada
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Exploration of Strategies for Organic Integration of Labor Education and Occupational Therapy for College Students.

Authors:  Linna Du; Weizheng Wang
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 1.565

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.