| Literature DB >> 33111455 |
Nazia Binte Ali1, Michael J Dibley2, Sajia Islam1, Mohammad Masudur Rahman1, Shahreen Raihana1,2, Shams E Tabriz Bhuiyan1, Qazi Sadequr Rahman1, Hafizur Rahman1, Shams El Arifeen1, Tanvir M Huda1,2.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with overweight and obesity among nonpregnant and nonlactating (NPNL) women of reproductive age with iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) in urban Bangladesh. We obtained data from the baseline assessment of a randomized control trial conducted among 525 women of reproductive age (18-49 years) with IDA (Hb < 12 gdl-1 and serum ferritin <30 μg L-1 ). The study was carried out in Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh, between December 2017 and January 2019. We collected information on women's socio-demographic characteristics and anthropometry. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the following formula: weight in kilograms per height in square metres. BMI ≥ 25-29.9 kg m-2 was considered as overweight, whereas BMI ≥ 30 kg m-2 as obese. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to ascertain the risk factors of overweight and obesity. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was 29.9% (95% CI: 26.0-34.0) and 13.1% (95% CI: 10.4-16.3), respectively. The combined prevalence of overweight and obesity was 43.0% (95% CI: 38.7-47.4). The multivariable analysis showed married women (aOR: 4.4; CI: 1.8-11.1), women aged 30-49 years (aOR: 7.6; CI: 2.4-24.1), unemployed women (aOR 1.5; CI: 1.0-2.4) and women from the wealthier households (aOR 3.9; CI: 2.3-6.8) had the highest risk of being overweight and obese compared with their counterparts. Both age and household wealth statuses showed dose-response relationships. Combination of overweight and obesity with IDA poses a particular challenge for public health interventions. The policymakers should consider what new interventions and policy initiatives are needed to address this combination of overweight and obesity with IDA.Entities:
Keywords: Bangladesh; iron deficiency anaemia; obesity; overweight; urban area; women of reproductive age
Year: 2020 PMID: 33111455 PMCID: PMC7988850 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
FIGURE 1Study area map
Socio‐demographic characteristics of nonpregnant and nonlactating (NPNL) women of reproductive age (18–49 years) with iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) in Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2018
| Background characteristics |
| Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Women's characteristics | ||
| Age in years | ||
| 18–19 | 54 | 10.3 |
| 20–29 | 157 | 29.9 |
| 30–49 | 336 | 60.5 |
| Marital status | ||
| Unmarried | 69 | 13.1 |
| Married | 456 | 86.9 |
| Parity ( | ||
| None | 51 | 11.2 |
| 1 or more children | 405 | 88.8 |
| Women's education | ||
| No schooling | 155 | 29.5 |
| Primary (1–5 years) | 153 | 29.1 |
| Secondary and higher (+6 years) | 217 | 41.3 |
| Women's employment | ||
| Unemployed | 336 | 64.0 |
| Employed | 189 | 36.0 |
| Household characteristics | ||
| Household wealth index | ||
| Low | 175 | 33.3 |
| Medium | 175 | 33.3 |
| High | 175 | 33.3 |
| Household size | ||
| Mean household size | 525 | 4.3 |
| 1–4 persons | 308 | 58.7 |
| ≥5 persons | 217 | 41.3 |
Nutritional characteristics of NPNL women of reproductive age (18–49 years) with IDA in Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2018
| Underweight (BMI ≤ 18.4 kg m−2) | Normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg m−2) | Overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg m−2) | Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg m−2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence's (% with 95% CI) | 11.0 (8.5–14.0) | 45.9(41.6–50.3) | 29.9 (26.0–34.0) | 13.1(10.4–16.3) |
| Anthropometric measurement (mean ± sd) | ||||
| Height in cm | 150.9 ± 6.3 | 150.0 ± 5.9 | 149.9 ± 5.9 | 149.7 ± 7.1 |
| Weight in kg | 38.9 ± 4.2 | 48.8 ± 5.1 | 61.6 ± 5.6 | 73.8 ± 7.5 |
| MUAC in cm | 22.2 ± 1.7 | 26.1 ± 2.0 | 30.1 ± 3.2 | 33.5 ± 2.7 |
| BMI in kg m−2 | 17.0 ± 1.1 | 21.7 ± 1.8 | 27.4 ± 1.5 | 32.9 ± 2.9 |
| Biomarkers of IDA (mean ± sd) | ||||
| Haemoglobin in g dl−1 | 11.2 ± 1.5 | 11.2 ± 1.3 | 11.4 ± 1.3 | 11.4 ± 1.3 |
| Serum ferritin in μg L−1 | 26.7 ± 22.6 | 24.9 ± 19.5 | 23.7 ± 15.7 | 27.1 ± 26.5 |
Anaemia is defined as serum haemoglobin concentration <12 g dl−1; iron deficiency is defined as serum ferritin concentration <30 μg L−1.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; IDA, iron deficiency anaemia; NPNL, nonpregnant and nonlactating.
Prevalence of overweight and obesity among nonpregnant and nonlactating (NPNL) women of reproductive age (18–49 years) with iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) by socio‐economic characteristics in Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2018
| Background characteristics | Total number of participants | Number of participants with overweight and obesity | Proportion of participants with overweight and obesity % (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Women's characteristics | |||
| Age in years | |||
| 15–19 | 54 | 4 | 7.4(2.1–17.9) |
| 20–29 | 157 | 54 | 34.4(27.0–42.4) |
| 30–49 | 314 | 168 | 53.5(47.8–59.1) |
| Marital status | |||
| Unmarried | 69 | 8 | 11.6(5.1–21.6) |
| Married | 456 | 218 | 47.8(43.1–52.5) |
| Parity ( | |||
| None | 51 | 19 | 37.3(24.1–51.9) |
| 1 or more children | 405 | 199 | 49.1(44.2–54.1) |
| Women's education | |||
| No schooling | 155 | 56 | 36.1(28.6–44.2) |
| Primary (1–5 years) | 153 | 63 | 41.2(33.3–49.4) |
| Secondary and higher (+6 years) | 217 | 107 | 49.3(42.5–56.1) |
| Women's employment | |||
| Unemployed | 336 | 163 | 48.5(43.1–54.0) |
| Employed | 189 | 63 | 33.3(26.7–40.5) |
| Household characteristics | |||
| Household wealth index | |||
| Low | 175 | 44 | 25.1(18.9–32.2) |
| Medium | 175 | 76 | 43.4(35.9–51.1) |
| High | 175 | 106 | 60.6(52.9–67.9) |
| Household size | |||
| 1–4 persons | 308 | 140 | 45.5(39.7–51.2) |
| ≥5 persons | 217 | 86 | 39.6(33.1–46.5) |
Factors associated with overweight and obesity among NPNL women of reproductive age (18–49 years) with IDA in Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2018
| Background characteristics | Unadjusted | Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odd ratios | 95% CI | Odd ratios | 95% CI | |
| Women's characteristics | ||||
| Age in years | ||||
| 18–19 | Ref | Ref | ||
| 20–29 | 5.0 | (1.7–15.1) | 4.1 | (1.3–12.9) |
| 30–49 | 10.3 | (3.5–29.8) | 7.6 | (2.4–24.1) |
| Marital status | ||||
| Unmarried | Ref | Ref | ||
| Married | 6.4 | (2.9–13.9) | 4.4 | (1.7–11.1) |
| Parity | ||||
| None | Ref | |||
| 1 or more children | 1.3 | (0.7–2.4) | ||
| Women's education | ||||
| No schooling | Ref | Ref | ||
| Primary (1–5 years) | 1.1 | (0.7–1.7) | 1.1 | (0.6–1.8) |
| Secondary and higher (+6 years) | 1.6 | (1.0–2.5) | 1.9 | (1.1–3.3) |
| Women's employment | ||||
| Employed | Ref | Ref | ||
| Unemployed | 2.1 | (1.4–3.1) | 1.5 | (1.0–2.4) |
| Household characteristics | ||||
| Household wealth index | ||||
| Low | Ref | Ref | ||
| Medium | 2.3 | (1.4–3.7) | 2.3 | (1.4–3.9) |
| High | 4.6 | (2.9–7.5) | 3.9 | (2.3–6.8) |
| Household size | ||||
| 1–4 persons | Ref | |||
| ≥5 persons | 0.9 | (0.6–1.3) | ||
Unadjusted odds are reported from bivariate logistic regression.
Adjusted odds are reported from multivariable logistic regression.
Parity and household size were omitted from multivariable logistic regression as the variables were not found significant in bivariate logistic regression.
P value < 0.05.
P value < 0.001.
P value < 0.000.