| Literature DB >> 33109129 |
Ming Xia1,2, Di Liu1,2, Liang Peng1,2, Yan Li1,2, Haiyang Liu1,2, Lingzhi Wu1,2, Guochun Chen1,2, Yu Liu1,2, Hong Liu3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (T) score is a known determinant of the progression of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). Strong evidence indicates that the components of the coagulation system closely linked with fibrotic events have been highlighted in the kidney. However, whether the coagulation system can affect the renal outcome of IgAN remains unclear. Herein, we investigated the association of coagulation parameters and pathological phenotype of IgAN and their combined effects on the deterioration of renal function.Entities:
Keywords: Coagulation; Fibrosis; IgA nephropathy; Prognosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33109129 PMCID: PMC7590710 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-02111-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Fig. 1A flow diagram of the strategy used to identify IgAN patients
Clinical characteristics and histopathological features of study participants with and without tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T)
| Characteristics | All participants | IgAN without T | IgAN with T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP (mmHg) | 96.30 (12.75) | 94.90 (12.43) | 98.40 (12.97) | |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 92.73 (47.14) | 77.52 (28.05) | 115.35 (59.31) | |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) | 90.87 (69.14) | 98.11 (29.11) | 80.10 (102.43) | |
| Proteinuria (g/24 h) | 1.71 (2.51) | 1.77 (2.71) | 1.62 (2.20) | 0.056 |
| M0/M1 (% of M1) | 272/19 (6.53) | 161/13 (7.47) | 111/6 (5.13) | 0.428 |
| E0/E1 (% of E1) | 259/32 (11.00) | 157/17 (9.77) | 102/15 (12.82) | 0.415 |
| S0/S1 (% of S1) | 97/194 (66.67) | 80/94 (54.02) | 17/100 (85.47) | |
| T0/T1/T2 (% of [T1 + T2]) | 174/93/24 (40.2) | – | – | – |
| C0/C1/C2 (% of [C1 + C2]) | 227/56/8 (21.99) | 140/30/4 (19.54) | 87/26/4 (25.64) | 0.46 |
The data were presented as mean (SD) or count (percentage). Abbreviations: SBP systolic blood pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, Scr serum creatinine, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate. P values in bold denote significance at the 0.05 level
Comparison of coagulation parameters in IgAN patients without or with tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T)
| Factors | All participants | IgAN without T | IgAN with T | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT (s) | 11.80 (10.80–12.70) | 12.00 (11.10–12.80) | 11.40 (10.45–12.30) | |
| APTT (s) | 36.40 (31.00–41.80) | 38.60 (32.38–43.83) | 35.20 (29.15–39.25) | |
| TT (s) | 16.80 (15.50–18.60) | 16.75 (15.40–18.20) | 17.10 (15.55–19.40) | 0.075 |
| FDP (μg/ml) | 1.50 (1.00–2.30) | 1.50 (1.00–2.50) | 1.40 (1.00–2.00) | 0.3 |
| FIB (g/l) | 3.07 (2.54–3.87) | 3.03 (2.54–3.92) | 3.10 (2.53–3.84) | 0.964 |
| D-D (μg/ml) | 0.44 (0.25–0.81) | 0.40 (0.23–0.83) | 0.50 (0.30–0.77) | 0.188 |
| AT-III (%) | 98.90 (87.00–111.00) | 98.20 (85.45–109.28) | 100.10 (88.65–113.50) | 0.089 |
The data were presented as median (IQR). Abbreviations: PT prothrombin time, APTT activated partial thromboplastin time, TT thrombin time, FDP fibrinogen degradation products, FIB fibrinogen, D-D D-dimer, AT-III antithrombin III antibodies. P values in bold denote significance at the 0.05 level
Fig. 2Comparison of (a) PT and (b) APTT among T0, T1 and T2 IgAN patients. T0 group (n = 174), T1 group (n = 93) and T2 group (n = 24). The data were presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, # p < 0.01
Fig. 3ROC curves of (a) PT, (b) APTT for the identification of poor renal outcome. The best cut-off value for PT and APTT are labeled on the plot
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier curves of ESRD/50% drop in eGFR from baseline according to (a) PT, (b) APTT levels category
Association between baseline characteristics of patients and the incidence of renal outcome
| Baseline variables | HR | 95% Lower | 95% Upper | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, per 10 year | 0.81 | 0.55 | 1.20 | 0.29 |
| Gender (male versus female) | 0.98 | 0.41 | 2.33 | 0.964 |
| Scr, per 10 umol/L | 1.22 | 1.16 | 1.28 | |
| eGFR, per 10 mL/min/1.73m2 | 0.52 | 0.41 | 0.66 | |
| SBP, per 10 mmHg | 1.34 | 1.08 | 1.67 | |
| 24 h proteinuria, per 1 g | 1.13 | 1.00 | 1.28 | |
| PT (< 11.15 s versus > 11.15 s) | 3.27 | 1.30 | 8.24 | |
| APTT (< 29.65 s versus > 29.65 s) | 2.59 | 1.08 | 6.21 | |
| M (1 versus 0) | 0.05 | 0.00 | 223.16 | 0.476 |
| E (1 versus 0) | 0.79 | 0.18 | 3.41 | 0.752 |
| S (1 versus 0) | 3.68 | 1.08 | 12.59 | |
| T (≥1 versus 0) | 13.16 | 3.06 | 56.67 | |
| C (≥1 versus 0) | 1.58 | 0.61 | 4.10 | 0.344 |
Abbreviations: SBP systolic blood pressure, Scr serum creatinine, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate. P values in bold denote significance at the 0.05 level
Fig. 5The analysis of the additive effect of (a) PT, (b) APTT, and T score on the renal outcome. The renal outcome was defined as an ESRD or an irreversible 50% eGFR reduction. X-axis stood for subgroups of PT or APTT. Z-axis stood for with/without T, and the Y-axis stood for the OR value. Patients without T and PT > 11.15 s or APTT> 29.65 s were set as the reference, respectively. * p < 0.05, # p < 0.01