OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of corneal parameters in different stages of keratoconus patients using a combined Scheimpflug-Placido disc analysis system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, three consecutive measurements were performed by the same observer using Scheimpflug-Placido disc anterior segment analysis device in keratoconus patients. Flattest and steepest simulated keratometry and corneal volume, corneal aberrations, thinnest corneal thickness, symmetry index, keratoconus vertex and Baiocchi-Calossi-Versaci index were recorded. Keratoconic eyes were divided into four stages using the Amsler-Krumeich classification. Repeatability was evaluated using within the subject standard deviation, repeatability index (Ri) and coefficient of variation; reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between the parameters evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one eyes of 261 keratoconus patients were included in the study. The repeatability for all corneal curvature parameters decreased as the keratoconus severity increased, and there is a positive correlation between keratometry of the apex and corneal curvature parameters (p < 0.05) except mean simulated keratometry. The corneal aberrations were repeatable in all keratoconus subgroups (Ri < 0.34 μm). There are also positive correlations between keratometry of apex and corneal aberrations (p < 0.05) except total high-order root mean square and spherical aberration. The reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.90) for all indices except keratoconus vertex back. CONCLUSION: The parameters used in the diagnosis and follow-up of keratoconus in the Sirius corneal tomography system may differ more than expected at stages 3 and 4 of the disease. Awareness of this situation may be helpful in planning follow-up and treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of corneal parameters in different stages of keratoconus patients using a combined Scheimpflug-Placido disc analysis system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, three consecutive measurements were performed by the same observer using Scheimpflug-Placido disc anterior segment analysis device in keratoconus patients. Flattest and steepest simulated keratometry and corneal volume, corneal aberrations, thinnest corneal thickness, symmetry index, keratoconus vertex and Baiocchi-Calossi-Versaci index were recorded. Keratoconic eyes were divided into four stages using the Amsler-Krumeich classification. Repeatability was evaluated using within the subject standard deviation, repeatability index (Ri) and coefficient of variation; reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between the parameters evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one eyes of 261 keratoconus patients were included in the study. The repeatability for all corneal curvature parameters decreased as the keratoconus severity increased, and there is a positive correlation between keratometry of the apex and corneal curvature parameters (p < 0.05) except mean simulated keratometry. The corneal aberrations were repeatable in all keratoconus subgroups (Ri < 0.34 μm). There are also positive correlations between keratometry of apex and corneal aberrations (p < 0.05) except total high-order root mean square and spherical aberration. The reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.90) for all indices except keratoconus vertex back. CONCLUSION: The parameters used in the diagnosis and follow-up of keratoconus in the Sirius corneal tomography system may differ more than expected at stages 3 and 4 of the disease. Awareness of this situation may be helpful in planning follow-up and treatment.