Literature DB >> 33103313

How and how well have older people been engaged in healthcare intervention design, development or delivery using co-methodologies: A scoping review with narrative summary.

Fiona Cowdell1, Judith Dyson2, Michael Sykes3, Rinita Dam4, Rose Pendleton5.   

Abstract

Co-methodological working is gaining increasing traction in healthcare, but studies with older people have been slower to develop. Our aim was to investigate how and how well older people have been engaged in healthcare intervention design, development or delivery using co-methodologies. We conducted a systematic search of four electronic databases to identify international literature published between 2009 and November 2019. We included peer-reviewed empirical research of any design. Three authors screened papers. Our review is reported in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for scoping reviews, we have referred to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement. We data extracted to a bespoke spreadsheet and used the Co:Create Co-production Matrix to guide quality appraisal. Included studies (n = 48) were diverse in nature of interventions, co-methodologies and reporting. We offer a narrative summary of included papers. Establishing how older people were engaged in co-methodological work was largely straightforward. How well this was done was more challenging, however we have identified gems of good practice and offered directions for future practice. The Co:Create Co-Production Matrix was the best fit for evaluating papers, however it is not intended as a measure per se. In essence we argue that notions of 'best' and 'scores' are an oxymoron in co-methodological working, what is important that: (a) researchers embrace these methods, (b) incremental change is the way forward, (c) researchers need to do what is right for people and purpose and (d) have time to consider and articulate why they are choosing this approach and how best this can be achieved for their particular situation. Future evaluation of participant's experience of the process would enable others to learn about what works for who and in what circumstances.
© 2020 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  co-creation; co-design; co-method; co-production; health; intervention; older; participatory; review

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33103313     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  6 in total

1.  Life-Course Marginalities of Positive Health and Aging: A Participatory Approach Integrating the Lived Experiences of Older Irish Travelers and Older Homeless Adults in Multistakeholder Research Processes.

Authors:  Kieran Walsh; Brídín Carroll; Anne MacFarlane; Diarmuid O'Donovan; Peter Cush
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Development of a Digital Tool for People With a Long-Term Condition Using Stroke as a Case Example: Participatory Design Approach.

Authors:  Emma K Kjörk; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson; Anders K Andersson; Gunnel Carlsson
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  Translating qualitative data into intervention content using the Theoretical Domains Framework and stakeholder co-design: a worked example from a study of cervical screening attendance in older women.

Authors:  Alison Bravington; Hong Chen; Judith Dyson; Lesley Jones; Christopher Dalgliesh; Amée Bryan; Julietta Patnick; Una Macleod
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.908

4.  Supporting safe and gradual reduction of long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonist use: Development of the SAFEGUARDING-BZRAs toolkit using a codesign approach.

Authors:  Tom Lynch; Cristín Ryan; Colin Bradley; D Foster; Christy Huff; Sharon Hutchinson; Nicole Lamberson; Lily Lynch; Cathal Cadogan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.318

5.  User Experience of the Co-design Research Approach in eHealth: Activity Analysis With the Course-of-Action Framework.

Authors:  Melanie Tremblay; Christine Hamel; Anabelle Viau-Guay; Dominique Giroux
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-08-09

6.  The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cheryl Grindell; Elizabeth Coates; Liz Croot; Alicia O'Cathain
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.908

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.