Literature DB >> 33102893

Complications associated with L4-5 anterior retroperitoneal trans-psoas interbody fusion: a single institution series.

Saeed S Sadrameli1, Vitaliy Davidov2, Meng Huang1, Jonathan J Lee1, Srivathsan Ramesh3, Jaime R Guerrero1, Marcus S Wong1, Zain Boghani1, Adriana Ordonez4, Sean M Barber1, Todd W Trask1, Andrew C Roeser1, Paul J Holman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), first described in the literature in 2006 by Ozgur et al., involves direct access to the lateral disc space via a retroperitoneal trans-psoas tubular approach. Neuromonitoring is vital during this approach since the surgical corridor traverses the psoas muscle where the lumbar plexus lies, risking injury to the lumbosacral plexus that could result in sensory or motor deficits. The risk of neurologic injury is especially higher at L4-5 due to the anatomy of the plexus at this level. Here we report our single-center clinical experience with L4-5 LLIF.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent an L4-5 LLIF between May 2016 and March 2019 was performed. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, such as body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgical history, tobacco status, operative time and blood loss, length of stay (LOS), and post-op complications were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 220 (58% female and 42% male) cases were reviewed. The most common presenting pathology was spondylolisthesis. The average age, BMI, operative time, blood loss, and LOS were 64.6 years, 29 kg/m2, 214 min, 75 cc, and 2.5 days respectively. A review of post-operative neurologic deficits revealed 31.4% transient hip flexor weakness and 4.5% quadricep weakness on the approach side. At 3-week follow-up, 9.1% of patients experienced mild hip flexor weakness (4 or 4+/5), 0.9% reported mild quadricep weakness, and 9.5% reported anterior thigh dysesthesias; 93.2% of patients were discharged home and 2.3% were readmitted within the first 30 days post discharge. Female sex, higher BMI and longer operative time were associated with hip flexor weakness.
CONCLUSIONS: LLIF at L4-5 is a safe, feasible, and versatile approach to the lumbar spine with an acceptable approach-related sensory and motor neurologic complication rates. 2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; lateral interbody fusion; lumbar fusion; minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS); trans-psoas approach

Year:  2020        PMID: 33102893      PMCID: PMC7548830          DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  45 in total

1.  Anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus with respect to the surgical approach for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion.

Authors:  Christopher K Kepler; Eric A Bogner; Richard J Herzog; Russel C Huang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Fusion in Italy and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Simona Vertuani; Jonas Nilsson; Benny Borgman; Giorgio Buseghin; Catherine Leonard; Roberto Assietti; Nasir A Quraishi
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Patrick Belton; Hekmat Zarzour; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

4.  Is the lateral transpsoas approach feasible for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis?

Authors:  Carlos Castro; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: anatomic study.

Authors:  Daniel K Park; Michael J Lee; Eric L Lin; Kern Singh; Howard S An; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-06

Review 6.  Learning Curve and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Salman Sharif; Afifa Afsar
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 7.  Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion.

Authors:  John K Houten; Lucien C Alexandre; Rani Nasser; Adam L Wollowick
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-05-27

8.  Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach.

Authors:  Antoine G Tohmeh; William Blake Rodgers; Mark D Peterson
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-12-17

9.  Evaluation of hip flexion strength following lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Yu-Po Lee; Gilad J Regev; Justin Chan; Bing Zhang; William Taylor; Choll W Kim; Steven R Garfin
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Operative results and learning curve: microscope-assisted tubular microsurgery for 1- and 2-level discectomies and laminectomies.

Authors:  Karishma Parikh; Andre Tomasino; Jared Knopman; John Boockvar; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.047

View more
  1 in total

1.  Complication rates following stand-alone lateral interbody fusion: a single institution series after 10 years of experience.

Authors:  Periklis Godolias; Zachary L Tataryn; Sven Frieler; Ravi Nunna; Kaarina Charlot; Angela Tran; Jonathan Plümer; Charlotte Cibura; Hamzah Al-Awadi; Zeyad Daher; Marcel Dudda; Thomas A Schildhauer; Jens Chapman; Rod Oskouian
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-10-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.