Literature DB >> 18673043

Operative results and learning curve: microscope-assisted tubular microsurgery for 1- and 2-level discectomies and laminectomies.

Karishma Parikh1, Andre Tomasino, Jared Knopman, John Boockvar, Roger Härtl.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors present their clinical results and the learning curve associated with the use of tubular retractors for 1- and 2-level lumbar microscope-assisted discectomies and laminectomies.
METHODS: The study involves a retrospective and prospective analysis of 230 patients who underwent noninstrumented minimally invasive procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal disease between 2004 and 2007. Data on patient demographic characteristics and operative results, including length of stay, blood loss, operative times, and surgical complications were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index values, and the Macnab outcome scale scores.
RESULTS: The results showed characteristic differences in blood loss and operating times between 1- and 2-level procedures and between discectomies and laminectomies. A significant learning curve was seen by a decrease in operating time for 1-level discectomies and 2-level laminectomies. Major complications were not observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of tubular retractors for microsurgical decompression of degenerative spinal disease is a safe and effective treatment modality. As with other techniques, minimally invasive procedures are associated with a significant learning curve. As surgeons become more comfortable with the procedure, its applications can be expanded to include, for example, spinal instrumentation and deformity correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18673043     DOI: 10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  21 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

2.  Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Patrick Belton; Hekmat Zarzour; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

3.  Unilateral tubular approach for bilateral laminotomy: effect on ipsilateral and contralateral buttock and leg pain.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Jose M Torres-Campa; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Guang-Ting Cong; Innocent Njoku; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Complications associated with the initial learning curve of minimally invasive spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph A Sclafani; Choll W Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Use of an operating microscope during spine surgery is associated with minor increases in operating room times and no increased risk of infection.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Nicholas S Golinvaux; Daniel D Bohl; Alem Yacob; Jason O Toy; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Comparative Study of the Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using the Tubular Retractor System Based on the VAS, ODI, and SF-36.

Authors:  Sang Mok Yoon; Soon-Seob Ahn; Ki Hong Kim; Young Don Kim; Jae Hoon Cho; Dae-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

7.  Complications associated with L4-5 anterior retroperitoneal trans-psoas interbody fusion: a single institution series.

Authors:  Saeed S Sadrameli; Vitaliy Davidov; Meng Huang; Jonathan J Lee; Srivathsan Ramesh; Jaime R Guerrero; Marcus S Wong; Zain Boghani; Adriana Ordonez; Sean M Barber; Todd W Trask; Andrew C Roeser; Paul J Holman
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09

8.  Timing and minimal access surgery for sciatica: a summary of two randomized trials.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Swaroop Das; Tushar S Kunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Efficacy of a new video-based training model in spinal surgery.

Authors:  D H Heiland; A K Petridis; H Maslehaty; J Thissen; A Kinzel; M Scholz; L Schreiber
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.