| Literature DB >> 33102581 |
Ke Li1, Qi Zhang1, Duan Niu2, Hailong Xing1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To mine miR expression in glioma based on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and to explore its effects on biological functions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33102581 PMCID: PMC7576330 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5637864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Primer sequences.
| Gene | Forward primers | Reverse primers |
|---|---|---|
| miR-873-5p | 5′-ACACTCCAGCTGGGGCAGGAACTTGTGAG-3′ | 5′-TGGTGTCGTGGAGTCG-3′ |
| U6 | 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ | 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′ |
Figure 1Clinical value of miR-873-5p in glioma. (a) miR-873-5p expression in the patients. (b) The diagnostic value of miR-873-5p for glioma. (c) miR-873-5p expression in the tumor diameter of the patients. (d) The diagnostic value of miR-873-5p for the tumor diameter of the patients. (e) miR-873-5p expression in the lymph node metastasis of the patients. (f) The diagnostic value of f miR-873-5p for the lymph node metastasis of the patients. (g) miR-873-5p expression in the TNM staging of the patients. (h) The diagnostic value of miR-873-5p for the TNM staging of the patients. ∗ indicates p < 0.05.
Relationship between miR-873-5p and pathological data.
| Factors | Relative expression of miR-873-5p |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male ( | 0.632 ± 0.058 | 0.147 | 1.473 |
| Female ( | 0.607 ± 0.062 | |||
| Age | <55 years old ( | 0.604 ± 0.047 | 1.684 | 0.099 |
| ≥55 years old ( | 0.637 ± 0.067 | |||
| Tumor diameter | <5 cm ( | 0.670 ± 0.071 | 8.108 | <0.001 |
| ≥5 cm ( | 0.508 ± 0.053 | |||
| Lymph node metastasis | Yes ( | 0.524 ± 0.051 | 7.320 | <0.001 |
| No ( | 0.668 ± 0.074 | |||
| TNM staging | I+II ( | 0.653 ± 0.065 | 6.638 | <0.001 |
| III+IV ( | 0.536 ± 0.049 | |||
ROC parameters.
| Parameters | Disease diagnosis | Tumor diameter | Lymph node metastasis | TNM staging |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC | 0.842 | 0.706 | 0.865 | 0.793 |
| Std. error | 0.039 | 0.077 | 0.053 | 0.065 |
| 95% CI | 0.766~0.917 | 0.556~0.856 | 0.762~0.968 | 0.667~0.920 |
| Specificity | 74.00% | 58.82% | 78.13% | 71.88% |
| Sensitivity | 80.00% | 87.50% | 83.33% | 83.33% |
| Youden index | 54.00% | 46.32% | 61.46% | 55.21% |
| Cut-off | >0.744 | <0.723 | <0.657 | <0.670 |
Figure 2Five-year survival status of patients. (a) The 5-year survival rate in the low expression group was remarkably lower than that in the high expression group (p = 0.024). (b) The 5-year RFS in the low expression group was remarkably lower than that in the high expression group (p = 0.041).
Cox analysis.
| Factors | Univariate Cox | Multivariate Cox | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR |
| HR (95% CI) | HR |
| HR (95% CI) | |
| Gender (male vs. female) | 2.758 | 0.458 | 1.337~3.522 | |||
| Age (<55 years old vs. ≥55 years old) | 0.509 | 0.071 | 0.245~1.058 | |||
| Tumor diameter (<5 cm vs. ≥5 cm) | 5.174 | 0.002 | 1.798~14.891 | 5.539 | 0.003 | 1.796~17.082 |
| Lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no) | 3.510 | 0.000 | 1.731~7.115 | 5.649 | <0.001 | 2.405~13.268 |
| TNM staging (I+II vs. III+IV) | 0.382 | 0.008 | 0.188~0.777 | 0.573 | 0.166 | 0.260~1.260 |
| Cystic degeneration of tumor (yes vs. no) | 3.684 | 0.296 | 1.504~8.426 | |||
| Complicated with epilepsy (yes vs. no) | 2.071 | 0.656 | 1.725~5.242 | |||
| miR-873-5p (high vs. low) | 0.758 | 0.000 | 0.365~1.575 | 9.315 | <0.001 | 3.108~27.914 |
Figure 3miR-873-5p expression in cells and its biological function to cells (a) miR-873-5p expression in HEK-293T cells is remarkably higher than that in U87, T98G, U251, and LN-229 cells. (b) The expression of miR-873-5p in the miR-873-5p-mimic group was remarkably higher than that in the miR-NC group in T98G and U251 cells transfected with miR-873-5p-mimics. (c, d) The proliferation ability of the miR-873-5p-mimic group of T98G and U251 cells was remarkably lower than that of the miR-NC group. (e) The cell invasion rate of the miR-873-5p-mimic group of T98G and U251 cells was remarkably lower than that of the miR-NC group. (f) The apoptosis rate of the miR-873-5p-mimic group of T98G and U251 cells was remarkably higher than that of the miR-NC group.∗ indicates p < 0.05, ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001.