| Literature DB >> 33101662 |
Emily de S Ferreira1, Luciana S da Silva2, Glauce D da Costa1, Tiago R Moreira3, Luíza D Borges1, Rosângela M M Cotta1.
Abstract
The chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are considered a serious public health problem. The objective was investigating the association of DM with the anthropometric measures, biochemical profile and dietary intake in patients with CKD. Is a cross-sectional study done in 2017, with 51 patients previously diagnosed with CKD. We collect socio-demographic, lifestyle variables, anthropometric measurements, biochemical profile and dietary intake. We using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, followed by Pearson's χ 2 test and Student's t test. Data were analysed using several multivariable logistic regression models, including the socio-demographic, anthropometric, dietary intake and biochemical variable. Variables with P ≤ 0⋅20 in the univariate analyses were selected and kept in the block in the simple and multiple logistic regression analysis, to determine the differences between the categories and the factors associated with the presence of DM or not, remaining in the model final, only the significant variables (P ≤ 0⋅05). Each variable was adjusted for all other variables included in the univariate analysis. The strength of the association was assessed by the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The multivariate logistic regression analysis evidenced that the increase of 1 cm in waist circumference and 1 mg/dl in VLDL-c values increases the chance of DM, respectively, by 8⋅4% (OR 1⋅076; P 0⋅05) and 8⋅8% (OR 1⋅102; P 0⋅01). In contrast, an increase of 1 mg/dl in total cholesterol decreases the chance of developing DM by 3⋅1% (OR 0⋅965; P 0⋅01), that is, it becomes a protective factor. The present study identified the associations between overweight, dietary intake and biochemical tests.Entities:
Keywords: Anthropometry; Biomarkers; Dietary intake; Primary health care; Renal insufficiency chronic
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33101662 PMCID: PMC7550961 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2020.38
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Fig. 1.Stages of chronic renal disease according to the glomerular filtration rate.
Socio-economic and anthropometric characteristics of CKD patients evaluated
| Total number of participants = 51 | |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Female | 37 (72⋅5) |
| Male | 14 (27⋅5) |
| Age (Years) | |
| ≤65 | 7 (11⋅9) |
| ≥66 | 44 (74⋅6) |
| Education | |
| Illiterate | 16 (31⋅4) |
| Read and write | 6 (11⋅8) |
| 1 and 4 years | 22 (43⋅1) |
| 5 year to higher education | 7 (13⋅7) |
| Occupation | |
| Informal work | 7 (13⋅7) |
| Retired/pensioner | 44 (86⋅3) |
| Family income | |
| <1 minimum wage | 1 (2⋅0) |
| 1 and 3 minimum salaries | 45 (88⋅2) |
| 3 and 5 minimum wages | 5 (9⋅8) |
| Marital status | |
| Without partner | 22 (43⋅2) |
| With partner | 29 (56⋅9) |
| Nutritional status | |
| Low weight | 8 (15⋅7) |
| Eutrophic | 16 (31⋅4) |
| Overweight | 27 (52⋅9) |
| Risk of metabolic complications | |
| Without risk | 12 (23⋅5) |
| Increased risk | 8 (15⋅7) |
| Substantially increased risk | 31 (60⋅8) |
Socio-economic, anthropometric, dietary intake and biochemical variables of CKD patients according to the presence of diabetes mellitus
| Variables | Diabetes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (Mean/ | No (Mean/ | ||
| Socio-demographic | |||
| Age (years) | |||
| ≤65 | 3 (5⋅9) | 4 (7⋅8) | 0⋅652 |
| ≥66 | 15 (29⋅4) | 29 (56⋅9) | |
| With partner | 10 (55⋅6) | 19 (57⋅6) | 0⋅889 |
| Without partner | 8 (44⋅4) | 14 (42⋅4) | |
| Sex | |||
| Female | 15 (83⋅3) | 22 (66⋅7) | 0⋅202 |
| Male | 3 (16⋅7) | 11 (33⋅3) | |
| Anthropometric | |||
| WC (cm) | 101⋅68 (8⋅9) | 90⋅89 (12⋅3) | 0⋅002 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30⋅10 (4⋅9) | 26⋅39 (5⋅6) | 0⋅022 |
| Dietary intake | |||
| CHO (% consumption) | 62⋅84 (10⋅0) | 60⋅3 (14⋅0) | 0⋅502 |
| PNT (g consumption) | 34⋅6 (28⋅2) | 33⋅91 (19⋅6) | 0⋅919 |
| LIP (% of consumption) | 20⋅40 (6⋅1) | 20⋅21 (9⋅6) | 0⋅939 |
| Calcium (mg) | 317⋅4 (240⋅5) | 301⋅06 (190⋅6) | 0⋅791 |
| Sodium (mg) | 696⋅04 (542⋅3) | 551⋅65 (352⋅6) | 0⋅255 |
| Potassium (mg) | 1395⋅95 (747⋅2) | 1206⋅63 (444⋅8) | 0⋅261 |
| Phosphorus (mg) | 519⋅3 (362⋅2) | 504⋅9 (255⋅3) | 0⋅869 |
| Water (ml/d) | 67⋅17 (38⋅0) | 83⋅4 (65⋅2) | 0⋅448 |
| Oil (ml/d) | 94⋅8 (25⋅8) | 118⋅3 (34⋅3) | 0⋅017 |
| Salt (g/d) | 9⋅71 (4⋅5) | 10⋅3 (7⋅7) | 0⋅790 |
| Sugar (g/d) | 67⋅17 (38⋅0) | 83⋅4 (65⋅2) | 0⋅448 |
| Biochemical exams | |||
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 119⋅72 (42⋅0) | 90⋅82 (28⋅4) | 0⋅005 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 173⋅06 (25⋅5) | 190⋅30 (43⋅4) | 0⋅129 |
| HDL-c (mg/dl) | 42⋅83 (6⋅3) | 48⋅03 (8⋅7) | 0⋅031 |
| LDL-c (mg/dl) | 95 (26⋅0) | 118 (34⋅0) | 0⋅017 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 192⋅9 (106⋅0) | 119⋅42 (65⋅5) | 0⋅004 |
| VLDL-c (mg/dl) | 35⋅12 (15⋅5) | 24 (13⋅2) | 0⋅010 |
WC, waist circumference; BMI, body mass index; CHO, carbohydrate; PTN, protein; LIP, lipid; sd, standard deviation; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; VLDL, very-low-density lipoproteins.
P < 0⋅20 by χ2 test or Student's t test.
Logistic regression analysis on associations between socio-economic, anthropometric, dietary intake and biochemical variables of patients with CKD according to diabetes mellitus
| Variables | Crude analysis | Adjusted analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95 % CI | OR | 95 % CI | |||
| Óil (ml) | 0⋅982 | 0⋅95–1⋅01 | 0⋅24 | 0⋅99 | 0⋅95–1⋅03 | 0⋅75 |
| WC (cm) | 1⋅094 | 1⋅03–1⋅17 | 0⋅05 | 1⋅076 | 1⋅00–1⋅16 | 0⋅05 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 0⋅986 | 0⋅97–1⋅00 | 0⋅13 | 0⋅965 | 0⋅94–0⋅99 | 0⋅01 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 1⋅025 | 1⋅00–1⋅05 | 0⋅02 | 1⋅007 | 0⋅98–1⋅03 | 0⋅53 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1⋅136 | 1⋅01–1⋅27 | 0⋅03 | 1⋅124 | 0⋅83–1⋅52 | 0⋅45 |
| HDL-c (mg/dl) | 0⋅909 | 0⋅83–0⋅99 | 0⋅04 | 1⋅043 | 0⋅92–1⋅12 | 0⋅52 |
| LDL-c (mg/dl) | 0⋅972 | 0⋅95–0⋅99 | 0⋅02 | 1⋅124 | 0⋅81–15⋅64 | 0⋅93 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 1⋅011 | 1⋅00–1⋅02 | 0⋅01 | 1⋅042 | 0⋅62–1⋅74 | 0⋅87 |
| VLDL-c (mg/dl) | 1⋅055 | 1⋅00–1⋅10 | 0⋅02 | 1⋅102 | 1⋅02–1⋅18 | 0⋅01 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | 1 | – | 0⋅68 | 1 | – | |
| Male | 0⋅400 | 0⋅09–1⋅68 | 0⋅21 | 0⋅460 | 0⋅46–4⋅59 | 0⋅50 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence intervals; WC, waist circumference; BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; VLDL, very-low-density lipoproteins.
Multiple logistic regression analysis. Each variable was adjusted for all other variables in the table. The dependent variable is the presence of the DM.