Adrianne Rahde Bischoff1, Bonny Jasani2, Shyam K Sathanandam3, Carl Backes4, Dany E Weisz5, Patrick J McNamara6. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH. 5. Newborn and Developmental Pediatrics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Electronic address: patrick-mcnamara@uiowa.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate technical success and safety of percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in infants ≤1.5 kg. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Data sources included Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed from inception to April 2020. Publications were included if they had a clear definition of the intervention as percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in infants ≤1.5 kg. Data extraction was independently performed by multiple observers. Primary outcome was technical success and secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analysis was performed in infants ≤6.0 kg. Data were pooled by using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We included 28 studies, including 373 infants ≤1.5 kg and 69 studies enrolling 1794 infants ≤6.0 kg. In patients ≤1.5 kg, technical success was 96% (95% CI, 93%-98%; P = .16; I2 = 23%). The overall incidence of AE was 27% (95% CI, 17%-38%; P < .001; I2 = 70%) and major AEs was 8% (95% CI, 5%-10%; P = .63; I2 = 0%). There were 5 deaths related to the procedure (2%; 95% CI, 1%-4%; P = .99; I2 = 0%); 4 of these deaths occurred in infants <0.8 kg. The probability of technical failure was inversely related to age at the time of the procedure (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.830-0.974; P = .009). Weight at intervention has decreased over time and procedural success has increased. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure is feasible in infants ≤1.5 kg with few major AEs. The procedural success rate is high, despite performing the intervention in smaller patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020145230. Crown
OBJECTIVE: To investigate technical success and safety of percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in infants ≤1.5 kg. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Data sources included Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed from inception to April 2020. Publications were included if they had a clear definition of the intervention as percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in infants ≤1.5 kg. Data extraction was independently performed by multiple observers. Primary outcome was technical success and secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analysis was performed in infants ≤6.0 kg. Data were pooled by using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We included 28 studies, including 373 infants ≤1.5 kg and 69 studies enrolling 1794 infants ≤6.0 kg. In patients ≤1.5 kg, technical success was 96% (95% CI, 93%-98%; P = .16; I2 = 23%). The overall incidence of AE was 27% (95% CI, 17%-38%; P < .001; I2 = 70%) and major AEs was 8% (95% CI, 5%-10%; P = .63; I2 = 0%). There were 5 deaths related to the procedure (2%; 95% CI, 1%-4%; P = .99; I2 = 0%); 4 of these deaths occurred in infants <0.8 kg. The probability of technical failure was inversely related to age at the time of the procedure (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.830-0.974; P = .009). Weight at intervention has decreased over time and procedural success has increased. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure is feasible in infants ≤1.5 kg with few major AEs. The procedural success rate is high, despite performing the intervention in smaller patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020145230. Crown
Authors: Megan Barcroft; Christopher McKee; Darren P Berman; Rachel A Taylor; Brian K Rivera; Charles V Smith; Jonathan L Slaughter; Afif El-Khuffash; Carl H Backes Journal: Clin Perinatol Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 3.430
Authors: Carl H Backes; Kevin D Hill; Elaine L Shelton; Jonathan L Slaughter; Tamorah R Lewis; Dany E Weisz; May Ling Mah; Shazia Bhombal; Charles V Smith; Patrick J McNamara; William E Benitz; Vidu Garg Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-09-03 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Mohamed Al Nasef; Donnchadh O Sullivan; Li Yen Ng; Kevin P Walsh; Paul Oslizlok; Brian McCrossan; Damien Kenny; Shyam Sathanandam Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2022-01-30 Impact factor: 2.585
Authors: Shyam Sathanandam; Dan Gutfinger; Brian Morray; Darren Berman; Matthew Gillespie; Thomas Forbes; Jason N Johnson; Ruchira Garg; Sophie Malekzadeh-Milani; Alain Fraisse; Osman Baspinar; Evan M Zahn Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 1.655