Literature DB >> 33098652

Immediate action effects motivate actions based on the stimulus-response relationship.

Takumi Tanaka1, Katsumi Watanabe2,3, Kanji Tanaka4.   

Abstract

The theory of event coding, an influential framework for action planning, suggests that humans first integrate stimulus, response, and action effect into representation (an event file) via their contingencies, and then, the activation of expected action effects drives the associated response. While previous studies have typically examined such functions of action effects after, rather than before or during, the acquirement of the representation, Eitam et al. (Exp Brain Res 229:475-484, 2013a) demonstrated that the presence of immediate feedback to action (i.e., action effects) can instantly elicit faster responses than delayed feedback. However, the underlying mechanism of this faciliatory effect remains unclear. Specifically, while the response-effect relationship has been highlighted, the role of stimuli has not been investigated. To address this issue, the present study conducted four experiments. We first reproduced the faciliatory effects of immediate action effects with between- and within-participants design (Experiments 1 and 2, respectively). Then, we assessed whether immediate action effects facilitate response speed, when stimuli (Experiment 3) and a combination of stimuli and responses (Experiment 4) determined the delay of action effects. The identical response was executed faster when driven by stimuli associated with immediate effects than by those associated with lagged effects. This result indicates that immediate action effects do not reinforce the execution of specific motor actions itself, but facilitate actions depending on the stimulus-response relationship. We discuss the potential mechanism of the facilitation effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action effect; Control feedback; Ideomotor theory; Sense of agency; Theory of event coding

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33098652      PMCID: PMC7884369          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05955-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

Review 1.  The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem?

Authors:  P Redgrave; T J Prescott; K Gurney
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; C D Frith; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning.

Authors:  Birgit Elsner; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-18

Review 4.  A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.

Authors:  Yun Kyoung Shin; Robert W Proctor; E J Capaldi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Representation of action-specific reward values in the striatum.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Samejima; Yasumasa Ueda; Kenji Doya; Minoru Kimura
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

7.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  I control therefore I do: judgments of agency influence action selection.

Authors:  N Karsh; B Eitam
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-02-24

9.  Learning how to exploit sources of information.

Authors:  Brad Wyble; Michael Hess; Ryan E O'Donnell; Hui Chen; Baruch Eitam
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

10.  The influence of action-outcome contingency on motivation from control.

Authors:  Tegan Penton; Xingquan Wang; Michel-Pierre Coll; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  2 in total

1.  Motivation(s) from control: response-effect contingency and confirmation of sensorimotor predictions reinforce different levels of selection.

Authors:  Eitan Hemed; Noam Karsh; Ilya Mark-Tavger; Baruch Eitam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Task-irrelevant object response to action enhances the sense of agency for controlling the object in automation.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Takatsune Kumada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.