Literature DB >> 33098585

Screw-in-screw fixation of fragility sacrum fractures provides high stability without loosening-biomechanical evaluation of a new concept.

Ivan Zderic1, Daniel Wagner2, Clemens Schopper1, Moritz Lodde1, Geoff Richards1, Boyko Gueorguiev1, Pol Rommens2, Yves P Acklin1,3.   

Abstract

Surgical treatment of fragility sacrum fractures with percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation is associated with high failure rates. Turn-out is detected in up to 20% of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new screw-in-screw implant prototype for fragility sacrum fracture fixation. Twenty-seven artificial hemipelvises were assigned to three groups (n = 9) for instrumentation of an SI screw, the new screw-in-screw implant prototype, ora transsacral screw. Before implantation, a vertical osteotomy was set in zone 1 after Denis. All specimens were biomechanically tested to failure in upright position. Validated setup and test protocol were used for complex axial and torsional loading applied through the S1 vertebral body to promote turn-out of the implants. Interfragmentary movements were captured via optical motion tracking. Screw motions were evaluated by means of triggered anteroposterior X-rays. Interfragmentary movements and implant motions were significantly higher for SI screw fixation compared to both transsacral and screw-in-screw fixations. In addition, transsacral screw and screw-in-screw fixations revealed similar construct stability. Moreover, screw-in-screw fixation successfully prevented turn-out of the implant that remained during testing at 0° rotation for all specimens. From biomechanical perspective, fragility sacrum fracture fixation with the new screw-in-screw implant prototype provides higher stability than an SI screw, being able to successfully prevent turn-out. Moreover, it combines the higher stability of transsacral screw fixation with the less risky operational procedure of SI screw fixation and can be considered as their alternative treatment option.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SI screw; backing out; biomechanical testing; cutthrough; fragility fracture; locking screw; pelvis; sacroiliac screw; screw loosening; screw tilt; screw-in-screw; transsacral fixation; transsacral screw; unscrewing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33098585     DOI: 10.1002/jor.24895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  4 in total

1.  Instability of the posterior pelvic ring: introduction of innovative implants.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Thomas Vordemvenne; Niklas Grüneweller
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 2.  Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis and Sacrum: Current Trends in Literature.

Authors:  Erick Heiman; Pasquale Gencarelli; Alex Tang; John M Yingling; Frank A Liporace; Richard S Yoon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2022-06-07

3.  Biomechanical Comparison of Five Fixation Techniques for Unstable Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring.

Authors:  Moritz F Lodde; J Christoph Katthagen; Clemens O Schopper; Ivan Zderic; Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Does Cement Augmentation of the Sacroiliac Screw Lead to Superior Biomechanical Results for Fixation of the Posterior Pelvic Ring? A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Moritz F Lodde; J Christoph Katthagen; Clemens O Schopper; Ivan Zderic; R Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev; Michael J Raschke; René Hartensuer
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.