Literature DB >> 33098338

Prognostic Impact of Metastatic Site and Pattern in Patients with Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.

Craig A Bollig1, Christopher I Newberry2, Tabitha L I Galloway3, Robert P Zitsch3, Elyse K Hanly4, Vivian L Zhu4, Nitin Pagedar4, Rohit Nallani5, Andres M Bur5, William C Spanos6, Jeffrey B Jorgensen7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Investigate the relationship between site and pattern of distant metastasis (DM) and overall survival (OS) in a multi-institutional cohort of patients with DM head and neck cancer (HNC). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
METHODS: 283 patients treated at 4 academic centers in the Midwest HNC Consortium between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease patterns were divided between solitary metastatic versus polymetastatic (≥2 sites) disease. Survival functions for clinically relevant variables were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Median OS for all patients was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.4-10.6). Lung (n = 220, 77.7%) was the most common site of DM, followed by bone (n = 90, 31.8%), mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 55, 19.4%), liver (n = 41, 14.5%), and brain (n = 17, 6.0%). Bone metastases were independently associated with the worst prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3-2.1). On univariate analysis, brain metastases were associated with improved prognosis (HR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9), although this was not statistically significant on the multivariate analysis. Polymetastatic disease was present in the majority of patients (n = 230, 81.3%) and was associated with a worse prognosis compared to solitary metastatic disease (HR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0-2.0).
CONCLUSION: Our large, multi-institutional review indicates that both the metastatic pattern and site of DM impact OS. Polymetastatic disease and bone metastasis are associated with worse prognosis, independent of treatment received. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1838-E1846, 2021.
© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and Neck; hypopharynx/esophagus; larynx; oral cavity; oropharynx

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33098338      PMCID: PMC8896291          DOI: 10.1002/lary.29208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  25 in total

Review 1.  Brain metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a review of the literature in the genomic era.

Authors:  Thomas F Barrett; Corey M Gill; Brett A Miles; Alfred M C Iloreta; Richard L Bakst; Mary Fowkes; Priscilla K Brastianos; Joshua B Bederson; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  Incidence and sites of distant metastases from head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A Ferlito; A R Shaha; C E Silver; A Rinaldo; V Mondin
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 3.  Oligometastatic head and neck cancer: Comprehensive review.

Authors:  Toms Vengaloor Thomas; Satyaseelan Packianathan; Eldrin Bhanat; Ashley Albert; Anu Abraham; Xiaoshan Gordy; Madhava Kanakamedala; Divyang Mehta; Srinivasan Vijayakumar
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  R de Bree; E E Deurloo; G B Snow; C R Leemans
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Distant metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Part I. Basic aspects.

Authors:  Robert P Takes; Alessandra Rinaldo; Carl E Silver; Missak Haigentz; Julia A Woolgar; Asterios Triantafyllou; Vanni Mondin; Daniela Paccagnella; Remco de Bree; Ashok R Shaha; Dana M Hartl; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  Risk factors for distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Werner Garavello; Alberto Ciardo; Roberto Spreafico; Renato Maria Gaini
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-07

7.  Robust Differences in p16-Dependent Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Distant Metastasis: Implications for Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  James J Jaber; Lauren Murrill; Joseph I Clark; Jonas T Johnson; Paul J Feustel; Vikas Mehta
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Distant metastases in head and neck epidermoid carcinoma.

Authors:  M L Dennington; D R Carter; A D Meyers
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  R J Black; J L Gluckman; D A Shumrick
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1984-12

10.  Long-term survival in patients with metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with metastasis-directed therapy.

Authors:  Thomas H Beckham; Jonathan E Leeman; Peng Xie; Xiaolin Li; Debra A Goldman; Zhigang Zhang; Eric Sherman; Sean McBride; Nadeem Riaz; Nancy Lee; C Jillian Tsai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Survival Outcomes and Treatment Decision by Human Papillomavirus Status Among Patients With Stage IVC Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ping Zhou; Yi-Feng Yu; Chen-Lu Lian; Jun Wang; Ren-Gong Zhuo; San-Gang Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.