Literature DB >> 33097620

Review of economic data on closed system transfer drug for preparation and administration of hazardous drugs.

Annaelle Soubieux1, Cynthia Tanguay1, Jean Lachaine2, Jean-François Bussières3,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to review economic data on the use of closed system drug transfer devices (CSTDs) for preparing and administering hazardous drugs, and to evaluate the quality of data reporting as defined by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS).
METHODS: All references from a recent Cochrane review about CSTDs were evaluated for inclusion. A literature review was also conducted. Articles containing economic data about the use of CSTDs were retained for analysis. Two researchers independently graded the articles according to the 24-item CHEERS checklist.
RESULTS: Of the 138 articles identified initially, 12 were retained for analysis. Nine of these studies did not report acquisition costs or did not detail acquisition costs. Six studies reported economic benefits associated with the used of CSTDs, all related to extending the beyond-use date. The mean number of CHEERS criteria fulfilled by the included articles was 9.2 (SD 2.4).
CONCLUSIONS: CSTDs are costly to acquire. However, few studies have examined the economic impact of these devices, and the existing studies are incomplete. As a result, hospitals planning to implement these devices will be unable to make a sound economic evaluation. Robust economic evaluation of CSTDs is needed. © European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Keywords:  closed system drug transfer device; compounding; economic evaluation; hazardous drug; preparation

Year:  2019        PMID: 33097620      PMCID: PMC7856154          DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 2047-9956


  18 in total

1.  Manufacturers' recommendations for handling spilled hazardous drugs.

Authors:  Richard Gonzalez; Firouzan Fred Massoomi
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  Impact and appreciation of two methods aiming at reducing hazardous drug environmental contamination: The centralization of the priming of IV tubing in the pharmacy and use of a closed-system transfer device.

Authors:  Annie Guillemette; Hélène Langlois; Maxime Voisine; Delphine Merger; Roxane Therrien; Genevieve Mercier; Denis Lebel; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 1.809

3.  Cost savings realized by use of the PhaSeal(®) closed-system transfer device for preparation of antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  Michael S Edwards; Dominic A Solimando; Franklin R Grollman; Janet L Pang; Ashley H Chasick; Charlene M Hightman; Anthony D Johnson; Maxine G Mickens; Lorenzo M Preston
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.809

4.  Reduction in surface contamination with antineoplastic drugs in 22 hospital pharmacies in the US following implementation of a closed-system drug transfer device.

Authors:  Paul J M Sessink; Thomas H Connor; James A Jorgenson; Timothy G Tyler
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 1.809

5.  Economic and microbiologic evaluation of single-dose vial extension for hazardous drugs.

Authors:  Erinn C Rowe; Scott W Savage; William A Rutala; David J Weber; Maria Gergen-Teague; Stephen F Eckel
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.

Authors:  Don Husereau; Michael Drummond; Stavros Petrou; Chris Carswell; David Moher; Dan Greenberg; Federico Augustovski; Andrew H Briggs; Josephine Mauskopf; Elizabeth Loder
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Cost-effectiveness study of closed system transfer devices for the preparation of antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  Gloria Calzado-Gómez; Gloria Julia Nazco-Casariego; Maria Micaela Viña-Romero; Fernando Gutiérrez-Nicolás
Journal:  Farm Hosp       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Surface contamination with ten antineoplastic drugs in 83 Canadian centers.

Authors:  L Chauchat; C Tanguay; N J Caron; S Gagné; F Labrèche; J F Bussières
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 1.809

9.  Reducing workplace cytotoxic surface contamination using a closed-system drug transfer device.

Authors:  Jim Siderov; Sue Kirsa; Robert McLauchlan
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.809

Review 10.  Closed-system drug-transfer devices plus safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing exposure to infusional hazardous drugs in healthcare staff.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Lawrence Mj Best; Cynthia Tanguay; Elaine Lennan; Mika Korva; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.