| Literature DB >> 33095048 |
Misha Angrist, Rodolphe Barrangou, Françoise Baylis, Carolyn Brokowski, Gaetan Burgio, Arthur Caplan, Carolyn Riley Chapman, George M Church, Robert Cook-Deegan, Bryan Cwik, Jennifer A Doudna, John H Evans, Henry T Greely, Laura Hercher, J Benjamin Hurlbut, Richard O Hynes, Tetsuya Ishii, Samira Kiani, LaTasha Hoskins Lee, Guillaume Levrier, David R Liu, Jeantine E Lunshof, Kerry Lynn Macintosh, Debra J H Mathews, Eric M Meslin, Peter H R Mills, Lluis Montoliu, Kiran Musunuru, Dianne Nicol, Helen O'Neill, Renzong Qiu, Robert Ranisch, Jacob S Sherkow, Sheetal Soni, Sharon Terry, Eric Topol, Robert Williamson, Feng Zhang, Kevin Davies.
Abstract
In September 2020, a detailed report on Heritable Human Genome Editing was published. The report offers a translational pathway for the limited approval of germline editing under limited circumstances and assuming various criteria have been met. In this perspective, some three dozen experts from the fields of genome editing, medicine, bioethics, law, and related fields offer their candid reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society report, highlighting areas of support, omissions, disagreements, and priorities moving forward.Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2020 PMID： 33095048 PMCID： PMC8935482 DOI： 10.1089/crispr.2020.29106.man
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CRISPR J ISSN： 2573-1599