Literature DB >> 31599680

Heritable Genome Editing and the Downsides of a Global Moratorium.

Kerry Lynn Macintosh1.   

Abstract

In 2018, Dr. He Jiankui reported that he had edited human embryos and transferred them to a woman, causing her to give birth to twin girls with modified genomes. An international group of scientists and ethicists responded by proposing a global moratorium on heritable genome editing (HGE). In this article, I oppose this proposal on several grounds. A global moratorium might encourage participating nations to ban HGE or postpone access to it indefinitely. It might also deter or delay basic research that could lead to safe and effective HGE. Lastly, a global moratorium might induce participating nations to adopt or maintain laws and regulations that stigmatize children born with modified genomes. As an alternative, I argue that nations should regulate HGE for safety and efficacy only and without distinguishing between therapeutic and enhancing modifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31599680     DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CRISPR J        ISSN: 2573-1599


  6 in total

1.  Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on Heritable Human Genome Editing.

Authors:  Misha Angrist; Rodolphe Barrangou; Françoise Baylis; Carolyn Brokowski; Gaetan Burgio; Arthur Caplan; Carolyn Riley Chapman; George M Church; Robert Cook-Deegan; Bryan Cwik; Jennifer A Doudna; John H Evans; Henry T Greely; Laura Hercher; J Benjamin Hurlbut; Richard O Hynes; Tetsuya Ishii; Samira Kiani; LaTasha Hoskins Lee; Guillaume Levrier; David R Liu; Jeantine E Lunshof; Kerry Lynn Macintosh; Debra J H Mathews; Eric M Meslin; Peter H R Mills; Lluis Montoliu; Kiran Musunuru; Dianne Nicol; Helen O'Neill; Renzong Qiu; Robert Ranisch; Jacob S Sherkow; Sheetal Soni; Sharon Terry; Eric Topol; Robert Williamson; Feng Zhang; Kevin Davies
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2020-10

2.  Toward Anticipatory Governance of Human Genome Editing: A Critical Review of Scholarly Governance Discourse.

Authors:  John P Nelson; Cynthia L Selin; Christopher T Scott
Journal:  J Responsible Innov       Date:  2021-07-29

3.  A virtual deliberative public engagement study on heritable genome editing among South Africans: Study protocol.

Authors:  Donrich Thaldar; Beverley Townsend; Marietjie Botes; Bonginkosi Shozi; Siddharthiya Pillay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Addressing Conflicts of Interest and Conflicts of Commitment in Public Advocacy and Policy Making on CRISPR/Cas-Based Human Genome Editing.

Authors:  Alexander Christian
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 5.  Homology-based repair induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in mammalian embryo genome editing.

Authors:  Xiya Zhang; Tao Li; Jianping Ou; Junjiu Huang; Puping Liang
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 14.870

6.  Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing.

Authors:  Bonginkosi Shozi; Tamanda Kamwendo; Julian Kinderlerer; Donrich W Thaldar; Beverley Townsend; Marietjie Botes
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.903

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.