| Literature DB >> 33093203 |
María R Felipe-Lucia1,2,3, Santiago Soliveres3,4, Caterina Penone3, Markus Fischer3, Christian Ammer5, Steffen Boch3,6, Runa S Boeddinghaus7, Michael Bonkowski8, François Buscot9,2, Anna Maria Fiore-Donno8, Kevin Frank10, Kezia Goldmann11, Martin M Gossner12,13, Norbert Hölzel14, Malte Jochum2,3,15, Ellen Kandeler7, Valentin H Klaus16, Till Kleinebecker17, Sophia Leimer18, Peter Manning19, Yvonne Oelmann20, Hugo Saiz3, Peter Schall5, Michael Schloter21, Ingo Schöning22,23, Marion Schrumpf22,23, Emily F Solly22,23,24, Barbara Stempfhuber21, Wolfgang W Weisser13, Wolfgang Wilcke18, Tesfaye Wubet2,10, Eric Allan3.
Abstract
Land-use intensification can increase provisioning ecosystem services, such as food and timber production, but it also drives changes in ecosystem functioning and biodiversity loss, which may ultimately compromise human wellbeing. To understand how changes in land-use intensity affect the relationships between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services, we built networks from correlations between the species richness of 16 trophic groups, 10 ecosystem functions, and 15 ecosystem services. We evaluated how the properties of these networks varied across land-use intensity gradients for 150 forests and 150 grasslands. Land-use intensity significantly affected network structure in both habitats. Changes in connectance were larger in forests, while changes in modularity and evenness were more evident in grasslands. Our results show that increasing land-use intensity leads to more homogeneous networks with less integration within modules in both habitats, driven by the belowground compartment in grasslands, while forest responses to land management were more complex. Land-use intensity strongly altered hub identity and module composition in both habitats, showing that the positive correlations of provisioning services with biodiversity and ecosystem functions found at low land-use intensity levels, decline at higher intensity levels. Our approach provides a comprehensive view of the relationships between multiple components of biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and ecosystem services and how they respond to land use. This can be used to identify overall changes in the ecosystem, to derive mechanistic hypotheses, and it can be readily applied to further global change drivers.Entities:
Keywords: BEF; Biodiversity Exploratories; co-occurrence network; ecosystem function–service relationships; land management intensification
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33093203 PMCID: PMC7668166 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016210117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205