Literature DB >> 33092751

Esophageal Endoscopy After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Ablation-Index Guided High-Power: Frankfurt AI-HP ESO-I.

Shaojie Chen1, K R Julian Chun2, Shota Tohoku3, Stefano Bordignon3, Lukas Urbanek3, Franziska Willems3, Karin Plank3, Max Hilbert3, Athanasios Konstantinou3, Nikolaos Tsianakas3, Fabrizio Bologna3, Claudia Kreuzer3, Luca Trolese3, Boris Schmidt4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the safety profile of a novel ablation index-guided high-power short-duration (AI-HP) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in terms of endoscopic esophageal lesions.
BACKGROUND: The risk of esophageal injury during PVI is a major concern while ablating the posterior wall for patients with atrial fibrillation. Luminal esophageal temperature (LET) rise during ablation is a surrogate for esophageal lesion development.
METHODS: A total of 122 consecutive symptomatic atrial fibrillation patients underwent AI-HP PVI (50 W throughout the ablation, AI anterior wall/posterior wall: 550/400). All patients were under LET monitoring (cutoff LET 39°C) during the ablation procedure, and patients with LET rise received esophageal endoscopy examination 1 to 3 days after the ablation. Ablation lesion data of the sites with LET rise were analyzed.
RESULTS: Procedural PVI success rate was 100%. Per procedure, the mean radiofrequency ablation time, procedural time, and fluoroscopic time were 11.9 ± 2.7 min, 54.8 ± 9 min, and 5.5 ± 1.6 min. The incidence of LET >39°C was 47%, and the mean peak LET was 41.2 ± 1.8°C. The rate of endoscopic detected lesion was 2 of 57 (3.5%). No perforation or atrial-esophageal fistula was found. The mean contact force, application duration, impedance drop, and AI values at the sites with LET rise were 22.1 ± 8.9 g, 7 ± 2.4 s, 9.4 ± 4.6 Ω, and 419 ± 44.6.
CONCLUSIONS: AI-HP (50 W) ablation appears to be a highly efficient ablation technique for PVI. The incidence of esophageal injury during AI-HP PVI seems markedly low. AI-HP ablation targeting AI 400 in combination with multisensor esophageal temperature monitoring for the left atrial posterior wall appears safe and efficient.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ablation; ablation index; atrial fibrillation; esophagus; high power; pulmonary vein isolation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33092751     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  10 in total

1.  Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Dibbendhu Khanra; Abdul Hamid; Saurabh Deshpande; Anindya Mukherjee; Sanjiv Petkar; Mohammad Saeed; Indranill Basu-Ray
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 2.  Innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Jitae A Kim; Khurrum Khan; Riyad Kherallah; Shamis Khan; Ishan Kamat; Owais Ulhaq; Qussay Marashly; Mihail G Chelu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Ablation index-guided 50W radiofrequency ablation for left atrial posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Wern Yew Ding; Lilith Tovmassian; Cedric Bierme; Nikola Kozhuharov; Richard L Snowdon; Dhiraj Gupta
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Preventing esophageal complications from atrial fibrillation ablation: A review.

Authors:  Lisa W M Leung; Zaki Akhtar; Mary N Sheppard; John Louis-Auguste; Jamal Hayat; Mark M Gallagher
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 5.  Efficiency, Safety, and Efficacy of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Xuerong Sun; Jiang Lu; Jinxuan Lin; Tianjie Feng; Ni Suo; Lihui Zheng; Zhimin Liu; Gang Chen; Xiaohan Fan; Shu Zhang; Guodong Niu
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.866

6.  Optimal Lesion Size Index for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Chi Cai; Jing Wang; Hong-Xia Niu; Jian-Min Chu; Wei Hua; Shu Zhang; Yan Yao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 7.  Protecting Against Collateral Damage to Non-cardiac Structures During Endocardial Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Lisa Wm Leung; Zaki Akhtar; Jamal Hayat; Mark M Gallagher
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2022-04

8.  Impact of High-Power and Very High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation on Procedure Characteristics and First-Pass Isolation During Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Zoltán Salló; Péter Perge; Bernadett Balogi; Gábor Orbán; Katalin Piros; Szilvia Herczeg; Klaudia Vivien Nagy; István Osztheimer; Pál Ábrahám; Béla Merkely; László Gellér; Nándor Szegedi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-07

9.  Ablation index-guided ablation with milder targets for atrial fibrillation: Comparison between high power and low power ablation.

Authors:  Zheng Liu; Li-Feng Liu; Xiao-Qin Liu; Jiapeng Liu; Yu-Xin Wang; Ye Liu; Xing-Peng Liu; Xin-Chun Yang; Mu-Lei Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-04

10.  Comparison of lesion characteristics between conventional and high-power short-duration ablation using contact force-sensing catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Chun-Chao Chen; Po-Tseng Lee; Vu Van Ba; Chieh-Mao Chuang; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Li-Wei Lo; Yu-Feng Hu; Fa-Po Chung; Chin-Yu Lin; Ting-Yung Chang; Jennifer Jeanne Vicera; Ting-Chun Huang; Chih-Min Liu; Cheng-I Wu; Isaiah C Lugtu; Ankit Jain; Shih-Lin Chang; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.298

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.