| Literature DB >> 33092598 |
Karla J Suchacki1,2, Nicholas M Morton3, Calvin Vary4, Carmen Huesa5,6, Manisha C Yadav7, Benjamin J Thomas3, Sophie Turban3, Lutz Bunger8, Derek Ball9, Martin E Barrios-Llerena10, Anyonya R Guntur4, Zohreh Khavandgar11, William P Cawthorn3, Mathieu Ferron12, Gérard Karsenty13, Monzur Murshed11, Clifford J Rosen4, Vicky E MacRae5, Jose Luis Millán7, Colin Farquharson5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The classical functions of the skeleton encompass locomotion, protection and mineral homeostasis. However, cell-specific gene deletions in the mouse and human genetic studies have identified the skeleton as a key endocrine regulator of metabolism. The bone-specific phosphatase, Phosphatase, Orphan 1 (PHOSPHO1), which is indispensable for bone mineralisation, has been recently implicated in the regulation of energy metabolism in humans, but its role in systemic metabolism remains unclear. Here, we probe the mechanism underlying metabolic regulation by analysing Phospho1 mutant mice.Entities:
Keywords: Bone; Choline; Endocrine organ; Energy metabolism; Insulin; Obesity; Osteocalcin; PHOSPHO1; Skeleton
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33092598 PMCID: PMC7584094 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-020-00880-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Fig. 1Juvenile Phospho1−/− mice display increased insulin sensitivity and decreased fat mass. Phospho1 mice showed decreased (a, b) growth and live weight at 35 days of age and (c) fasting glucose, (d, e) improved glucose and insulin tolerance and (f) decreased adipose tissue. Notable differences in tissue mass were also observed in the liver, quadriceps and spleen. These changes were not a consequence of (i) altered food intake or (j) energy expenditure. Data in (a) and are shown as mean ± SEM of 16–17 mice per group, (b) mean ± SEM 6–8 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and the data were assessed as follows: (a, d, e) repeated measures two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test; (b, c) two-tailed t test; (f, g) two-tailed unpaired t test; (i) two-tailed Mann–Whitney test; (j) two-tailed unpaired t test
Fig. 2Phospho1−/− mice are protected from glucose intolerance. a Body mass. b Glucose tolerance test (GTT). c Glucose stimulate insulin secretion (GSIS). d Insulin tolerance test (ITT). e Incremental area under the curve for GTT. f HOMA-IR. All data are shown as mean ± SEM. b–e 5–8 mice per group. Different letters above the error bar show significant difference at p < 0.05 and the data were assessed as follows: a, e, f Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; b–d repeated measures two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test
Fig. 3Phospho1−/− are protected from NAFLD. a Fat analysis of 120-day-old WT and Phospho1 mice on both a control and HFD. b Quantification of gonadal fat adipocyte diameter. c Quantitative assessment of liver fat utilising spectroscopy. d Gross livers of representative mice left to right (WT, WT HFD, Phospho1, Phospho1 HFD; scale bar = 10 mm). All data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. b, c n = 3–4 mice per group. *p < 0.05. Different letters above the error bar show significant difference at p < 0.05 and the data were assessed as follows: a–c Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons
Fig. 4Phospho1 mice are insulin sensitive despite decreased adiponectin. a Adiponectin, b leptin and c triglyceride serum quantification. RT-qPCR analysis of tissue extracted from 120-day-old WT and Phospho1 mice, d adipose tissue, e quadriceps femoris and f liver. RT-qPCR analysis of GLUT receptors from g adipose tissue, h quadriceps femoris and i liver. Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. * p < 0.05. Different letters above the error bar show significant difference at p < 0.05 and the data were assessed as follows: a–c Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, d–i two-tailed Mann–Whitney test for non-normally distributed data and two-tailed unpaired t test for normally distributed data
Fig. 5Canonical thermogenesis does not underlie the metabolic protection observed in the adult Phospho1-deficient mice. Brown adipose tissue (BAT) mass in a juvenile (35-day-old) and b adult (120-day-old) WT and Phospho1−/− mice. c Representative micrographs of BAT from WT and Phospho1−/− mice. d Brown fat gene expression and e UCP1 protein analysis. f–i Insulin sensitivity and protection from diet induced obesity in Phospho1−/− mice was not a consequence of altered energy expenditure (RER—respiratory exchange ratio; H4 = H3 (W)/lean mass (kg)). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Different letters above the error bar show significant difference at p < 0.05 and the data were assessed as follows: a, d two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. b, d, f–i Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons
Fig. 6Osteocalcin-independent mechanism of PHOSPHO1-regulated energy metabolism. To assess the relative change in Esp mRNA expression in primary calvarial osteoblasts, RT-qPCR was conducted to compare a primary WT and Phospho1 osteoblasts and b Phospho1 osteoblast transfected with empty (EV) or overexpressing (OE) vectors. c, d Osteocalcin content of serum from WT and Phospho1 mice at 60 and 120 days of age. Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M n = 5–6 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and the data were assessed as follows: a–c Two-tailed Mann–Whitney test or two-tailed unpaired t test
Fig. 7Ingenuity Pathways Analysis network summary predictions. a Ingenuity Pathways Analysis was used to predict further genes associated with glucose homeostasis based upon the 22 genes found to be differentially expressed in the microarray. b Predicated genes were analysed by RT-qPCR in WT and Phospho1 primary calvarial osteoblast’s. Results were normalised to the Atp5b housekeeping gene. Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M (n = 3 replicates). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Red = Upregulated. Green = Downregulated (the darker the shade of green and red colour indicates a more extreme up/down regulation, conversely the paler the shade indicates a more subtle up/down regulation. Dashed line = indirect interaction (blue = inhibition, yellow = findings underlying the relationship are inconsistent with the state of the downstream node, grey = Ingenuity Pathways Analysis prediction) and the data were assessed in (b) using a two-tailed unpaired t test
Fig. 8Bone derived choline regulates insulin sensitivity. a Schematic diagram outlining the mechanisms by which ceramide and choline and linked. b Mouse serum ceramide and choline (c) analysis by LC-MS/MS (ceramide) and assay (choline). d GTT. e ITT. f Dissected fat depot weights. g Quantification of epididymal fat adipocyte diameter and representative histology. Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M (c–g) n = 3–5 per group. Different letters above the error bar show significant difference at p < 0.05 and the data were assessed as follows: c, f, g Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. b One-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s or Tukey’s tests for multiple comparisons. d, e repeated measures two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test
Sequences of primers used for qPCR
| Species | Transcript | Primer sequences 5′ to 3′ |
|---|---|---|
| F: ATGGCCTCAATCCATCCCAG | ||
| R: GCAAGCAGGGTTGGAATCTTTG | ||
| F: GGCCGTTCTCTTCACCTACG | ||
| R: TGGAGGAGCACAGAGCCAG | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| F: ATTCCTGGTAACCGAATGCTG | ||
| R: CCGGTCTCAGGTATCAAACTAGC | ||
| F: CCATCCTTCACGATGACACCT | ||
| R: GGCAGGGTTATGAGTGACAGTT | ||
| F: CTGCTACTGGTTATCCTGCCA | ||
| R: TCTACCCTGATGTCTCTCCCA | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| F: ATTTCACACACGCAGTCGGTAT | ||
| R: GGTGGAGCCCAGGAATGAAG | ||
| F: TCTGTACGGCACAGTGG | ||
| R: CCTCTCGATGACGAAGC | ||
| F: CTCTTGCCTTGGCATTAGTCG | ||
| R: GGTCATCACAGTACATGGCAGT | ||
| F: CTGGATGATAATAGCGTGTGCT | ||
| R: AAGACAGGTAGTTTCAGGGCA | ||
| F: CATATGCTGATCCTGGGCATAAC | ||
| R: CAAACTTCATCCAGGCAATGTC | ||
| F: TTCTCATTTCGGATGCCAACA | ||
| R: TGAGGATGCGGCGGAATAA | ||
| F: CCCTGAACATCGAGTGTCGA | ||
| R: AATAGTTCGCCGAAAGAAGCC | ||
| F: CCCTGCCATTGTTAAGACC | ||
| R: TGCTGCTGTTCCTGTTTTC | ||
| Primer Design, Southampton, UK; sequence not disclosed | ||
| F: GTCAAAGCCGACCCAATGATA | ||
| R: CGTACACGCAAATAATAGGGGTT | ||
| F: ACCAAAAGCAACGGAGAAGAG | ||
| R: GGCATTCCGAAACAGGTAACTC | ||
| F: TCAACACGGCCTTCACTG | ||
| R: CACGATGCTCAGATAGGACATC | ||
| F: ACCAAAGGACAGTCTTTAGCTG | ||
| R: ATCTTCCAAGCAGACGGATG | ||
| F: GGGTGTCAACCTTCTCATCTC | ||
| R: CCAAAGAGCATCCCTTAGTCTC | ||
| F: TGTGCTGCTGGATAAATTCGCCTG | ||
| R: AACCATGAACCAAGGGATTGGACC | ||
| F: CCAGTATGTTGCGGATGCTAT | ||
| R: TTTTAGGAAGGTGAAGATGAAGAAG | ||
| F: GGATGGTGAACCCGACAACT | ||
| R: AACTCCGGCTGAGAAGATCTTG | ||
| F: GAATGTGCCTCGGATCTGTGG | ||
| R: ATGCGGCAATCTCCATTGAAG |
Antibodies used for Western blotting
| Protein | Species | Source | Catalogue Number | Dilution | Band size (kDa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHOSPHO1 | Human | AbD Serotec | HCA093 | 1:1000 | 30 |
| UCP1 | Rabbit | Cell Signaling | #14670 | 1:1000 | 32 |
| β-actin (HRP-linked) | Mouse | Sigma | A3854 | 1:50,000 | 45 |