Literature DB >> 22261725

Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis.

Ludovic C Gillet1, Pedro Navarro, Stephen Tate, Hannes Röst, Nathalie Selevsek, Lukas Reiter, Ron Bonner, Ruedi Aebersold.   

Abstract

Most proteomic studies use liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry to identify and quantify the peptides generated by the proteolysis of a biological sample. However, with the current methods it remains challenging to rapidly, consistently, reproducibly, accurately, and sensitively detect and quantify large fractions of proteomes across multiple samples. Here we present a new strategy that systematically queries sample sets for the presence and quantity of essentially any protein of interest. It consists of using the information available in fragment ion spectral libraries to mine the complete fragment ion maps generated using a data-independent acquisition method. For this study, the data were acquired on a fast, high resolution quadrupole-quadrupole time-of-flight (TOF) instrument by repeatedly cycling through 32 consecutive 25-Da precursor isolation windows (swaths). This SWATH MS acquisition setup generates, in a single sample injection, time-resolved fragment ion spectra for all the analytes detectable within the 400-1200 m/z precursor range and the user-defined retention time window. We show that suitable combinations of fragment ions extracted from these data sets are sufficiently specific to confidently identify query peptides over a dynamic range of 4 orders of magnitude, even if the precursors of the queried peptides are not detectable in the survey scans. We also show that queried peptides are quantified with a consistency and accuracy comparable with that of selected reaction monitoring, the gold standard proteomic quantification method. Moreover, targeted data extraction enables ad libitum quantification refinement and dynamic extension of protein probing by iterative re-mining of the once-and-forever acquired data sets. This combination of unbiased, broad range precursor ion fragmentation and targeted data extraction alleviates most constraints of present proteomic methods and should be equally applicable to the comprehensive analysis of other classes of analytes, beyond proteomics.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22261725      PMCID: PMC3433915          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O111.016717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  50 in total

Review 1.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Ruedi Aebersold; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Hongbin Liu; Rovshan G Sadygov; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  A computational tool to detect and avoid redundancy in selected reaction monitoring.

Authors:  Hannes Röst; Lars Malmström; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  John D Venable; Meng-Qiu Dong; James Wohlschlegel; Andrew Dillin; John R Yates
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Quantitative MS for proteomics: teaching a new dog old tricks.

Authors:  Michael J MacCoss; Dwight E Matthews
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Mass spectrometry and protein analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Domon; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  UPLC/MS(E); a new approach for generating molecular fragment information for biomarker structure elucidation.

Authors:  Robert S Plumb; Kelly A Johnson; Paul Rainville; Brian W Smith; Ian D Wilson; Jose M Castro-Perez; Jeremy K Nicholson
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  METLIN: a metabolite mass spectral database.

Authors:  Colin A Smith; Grace O'Maille; Elizabeth J Want; Chuan Qin; Sunia A Trauger; Theodore R Brandon; Darlene E Custodio; Ruben Abagyan; Gary Siuzdak
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast.

Authors:  Sina Ghaemmaghami; Won-Ki Huh; Kiowa Bower; Russell W Howson; Archana Belle; Noah Dephoure; Erin K O'Shea; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  An improved model for prediction of retention times of tryptic peptides in ion pair reversed-phase HPLC: its application to protein peptide mapping by off-line HPLC-MALDI MS.

Authors:  O V Krokhin; R Craig; V Spicer; W Ens; K G Standing; R C Beavis; J A Wilkins
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  756 in total

1.  A computational tool to detect and avoid redundancy in selected reaction monitoring.

Authors:  Hannes Röst; Lars Malmström; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 2.  Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.

Authors:  Paola Picotti; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Propafenone suppresses esophageal cancer proliferation through inducing mitochondrial dysfunction.

Authors:  Wei-Bin Zheng; Yang-Jia Li; Yang Wang; Jie Yang; Can-Can Zheng; Xiao-Hui Huang; Bin Li; Qing-Yu He
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics.

Authors:  Nishant Pappireddi; Lance Martin; Martin Wühr
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.164

5.  mapDIA: Preprocessing and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data from data independent acquisition mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Guoshou Teo; Sinae Kim; Chih-Chiang Tsou; Ben Collins; Anne-Claude Gingras; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Hyungwon Choi
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Revealing Dynamic Protein Acetylation across Subcellular Compartments.

Authors:  Josue Baeza; Alexis J Lawton; Jing Fan; Michael J Smallegan; Ian Lienert; Tejas Gandhi; Oliver M Bernhardt; Lukas Reiter; John M Denu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Accurate multiplexed proteomics at the MS2 level using the complement reporter ion cluster.

Authors:  Martin Wühr; Wilhelm Haas; Graeme C McAlister; Leonid Peshkin; Ramin Rad; Marc W Kirschner; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Integrating omics technologies to study pulmonary physiology and pathology at the systems level.

Authors:  Ravi Ramesh Pathak; Vrushank Davé
Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem       Date:  2014-04-28

Review 9.  Clinical applications of quantitative proteomics using targeted and untargeted data-independent acquisition techniques.

Authors:  Jesse G Meyer; Birgit Schilling
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 10.  Identification of small molecules using accurate mass MS/MS search.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Hiroshi Tsugawa; Tomas Cajka; Yan Ma; Zijuan Lai; Sajjan S Mehta; Gert Wohlgemuth; Dinesh Kumar Barupal; Megan R Showalter; Masanori Arita; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 10.946

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.