| Literature DB >> 33091078 |
Masayuki Yasuda1, Hajime Sato2, Kazuki Hashimoto1, Urara Osada1, Takehiro Hariya1, Hiroko Nakayama3, Toshifumi Asano1, Noriyuki Suzuki1, Tatsu Okabe1,4, Mai Yamazaki1,5, Megumi Uematsu4, Masanori Munakata6, Toru Nakazawa1,7,8,9.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate factors associated with poor visual acuity (VA) in branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33091078 PMCID: PMC7580897 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240977
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographics and clinical characteristics of the BRAO patients.
| All (N = 72) | Male (N = 56) | Female (N = 16) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 68.5 [58.0, 76.0] | 69.0 [59.0, 75.0] | 66.0 [47.8, 78.0] | 0.823 |
| Laterality of BRAO = R (%) | 45 (62.5) | 35 (62.5) | 10 (62.5) | 1.000 |
| VA (logMAR) | 0.05 [-0.00, 0.24] | 0.90 [0.70, 1.00] | 0.60 [0.34, 1.05] | 0.305 |
| Days from onset | 1.00 [0.75, 3.00] | 1.00 [0.75, 3.00] | 1.50 [0.75, 3.50] | 0.451 |
| Smoking history (%) | 24 (33.3) | 22 (39.3) | 2 (12.5) | 0.070 |
| History of hypertension (%) | 50 (69.4) | 38 (67.9) | 12 (75.0) | 0.761 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 144.0 [127.0, 156.3] | 144.0 [130.5, 153.8] | 142.0 [123.0, 174.5] | 0.670 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 82.5 [70.8, 93.0] | 82.0 [69.8, 92.3] | 85.5 [71.8, 111.8] | 0.378 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.75 [5.50, 6.10] | 5.80 [5.50, 6.10] | 5.65 [5.45, 6.00] | 0.41 |
| Hct (%) | 41.4 [38.8, 44.1] | 42.5 [40.0, 44.4] | 38.6 [37.6, 40.9] | 0.001 |
| Hgb (g/dl) | 14.1 [13.1, 15.0] | 14.6 [13.7, 15.3] | 12.9 [12.5, 13.7] | <0.001 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 48.0 [38.8, 54.0] | 47.0 [37.0, 53.3] | 50.0 [42.5, 56.3] | 0.180 |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 103.0 [81.8, 127.3] | 102.5 [81.0, 125.5] | 112.0 [92.8, 141.3] | 0.165 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 117.0 [87.3, 158.8] | 113.5 [88.8, 158.8] | 125.0 [75.5, 155.3] | 0.968 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) | 67.6 [56.7, 76.5] | 67.6 [55.8, 76.5] | 66.6 [57.0, 75.1] | 0.924 |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 0.13 [0.05, 0.29] | 0.11 [0.05, 0.33] | 0.15 [0.05, 0.19] | 0.650 |
| IMT-Bmax (mm) | 1.65 [1.10, 2.52] | 1.95 [1.37, 2.70] | 1.05 [0.90, 1.50] | <0.001 |
| IMT-Cmax (mm) | 1.20 [0.90, 2.00] | 1.25 [0.97, 2.60] | 1.00 [0.88, 1.20] | 0.022 |
Continuous variables are expressed as median [IQR]. The Man-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between groups. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables between groups.
*P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001.
VA: visual acuity, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin, Hct: hematocrit, Hgb: hemoglobin, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, TG: triglyceride, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, CRP: C-reactive protein.
Differences in values between the VA groups.
| VA ≥ 0.5 (N = 58) | VA < 0.5 (N = 14) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 67.0 [57.3, 72.8] | 77.0 [68.5, 82.8] | 0.018 |
| Gender = F/M (%) | 11/47 (19.0/81.0) | 5/9 (35.7/64.3) | 0.280 |
| Laterality of BRAO = R (%) | 35 (60.3) | 10 (71.4) | 0.645 |
| VA (logMAR) | 0.00 [-0.00, 0.15] | 1.00 [0.61, 1.28] | <0.001 |
| Days from onset | 1.00 [0.25, 3.00] | 1.00 [1.00, 2.50] | 0.730 |
| Smoking history (%) | 21 (36.2) | 3 (21.4) | 0.359 |
| History of hypertension | 41 (70.7) | 9 (64.3) | 0.886 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 145.0 [128.3, 156.8] | 133.5 [115.0, 149.5] | 0.147 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 83.5 [71.0, 94.5] | 81.0 [67.0, 89.8] | 0.503 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.80 [5.50, 6.10] | 5.60 [5.25, 5.85] | 0.199 |
| Hct (%) | 42.2 [40.2, 44.2] | 38.8 [36.9, 40.0] | <0.01 |
| Hgb (g/dl) | 14.5 [13.6, 15.0] | 13.1 [12.2, 13.6] | <0.01 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 49.0 [42.0, 54.8] | 39.0 [30.3, 50.0] | 0.025 |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 114.5 [88.3, 130.8] | 87.5 [81.0, 106.5] | 0.159 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 121.0 [96.5, 177.0] | 91.5 [76.5, 134.5] | 0.096 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) | 67.6 [56.9, 75.9] | 69.2 [51.4, 77.3] | 0.977 |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 0.11 [0.05, 0.23] | 0.20 [0.09, 0.47] | 0.084 |
| IMT-Bmax (mm) | 1.60 [1.10, 2.38] | 2.70 [1.35, 2.88] | 0.152 |
| IMT-Cmax (mm) | 1.20 [0.90, 2.08] | 1.20 [1.00, 1.48] | 0.853 |
Continuous variables are expressed as median [IQR]. The Man-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between groups. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables between groups.
*P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001.
VA: visual acuity, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin, Hct: hematocrit, Hgb: hemoglobin, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, TG: triglyceride, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, CRP: C-reactive protein.
Fig 1Correlation of visual acuity with carotid ultrasound parameters and HDL level in BRAO.
Scatterplot showing correlations of logMAR VA in BRAO at initial presentation with carotid ultrasound parameters (A: IMT-Bmax, B: IMT-Cmax) and HDL level (C). Spearman’s rank correlation test was performed to assess correlation coefficients (rs) and statistical significance.
Factors independently associated with poor visual acuity at initial presentation in BRAO.
| Variable | Adjusted OR (95% Cl) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Response | Explanatory | ||
| Poor VA (decimal VA < 0.5) | Age | 1.03 (0.97–1.10) | 0.309 |
| Gender (female) | 18.92 (1.86–192.29) | 0.013 | |
| HbA1c | 0.35 (0.08–1.57) | 0.172 | |
| CRP | 5.27 (0.83–33.41) | 0.078 | |
| HDL | 0.91 (0.83,0.99) | 0.032 | |
| IMT-Bmax | 2.76 (1.04,7.37) | 0.042 | |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis. OR: Odds ratio. Nagelkerke’s R-squared = 0.42
*P < 0.05.
HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin, CRP: C-reactive protein, HDL: high-density lipoprotein.
Fig 2Discriminative power of age, gender, HDL, and IMT-Bmax for poor visual acuity in BRAO.
ROC analysis of HDL (dotted line) and IMT-Bmax (dashed line). The model included age, gender, HDL, and IMT-Bmax (solid line). The area under the curve (AUC) is plotted.