PURPOSE: To examine sex- and race-associated differences in macular thickness and foveal pit morphology by using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS: One hundred eighty eyes of 90 healthy patients (43 women, 47 men) underwent retinal imaging with spectral-domain OCT. The lateral scale of each macular volume scan was corrected for individual differences in axial length by ocular biometry. From these corrected volumes, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grids of retinal thickness were generated and compared between the groups. Foveal morphology was measured with previously described algorithms. RESULTS: Compared with the Caucasians, the Africans and African Americans had reduced central subfield thickness. Central subfield thickness was also reduced in the women compared with the men, although the women also showed significant thinning in parafoveal regions. There was no difference between the sexes in foveal pit morphology; however, the Africans/African Americans had significantly deeper and broader foveal pits than the Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have reported race- and sex-associated differences in macular thickness, and the inference has been that these differences represent similar anatomic features. However, the data on pit morphology collected in the present study reveal an important and significant variation. Between the sexes, the differences are due to global variability in retinal thickness, whereas the variation in thickness observed between the races appears to be driven by differences in foveal pit morphology. These differences have important implications for the use of SD-OCT in detecting and diagnosing retinal disease.
PURPOSE: To examine sex- and race-associated differences in macular thickness and foveal pit morphology by using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS: One hundred eighty eyes of 90 healthy patients (43 women, 47 men) underwent retinal imaging with spectral-domain OCT. The lateral scale of each macular volume scan was corrected for individual differences in axial length by ocular biometry. From these corrected volumes, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grids of retinal thickness were generated and compared between the groups. Foveal morphology was measured with previously described algorithms. RESULTS: Compared with the Caucasians, the Africans and African Americans had reduced central subfield thickness. Central subfield thickness was also reduced in the women compared with the men, although the women also showed significant thinning in parafoveal regions. There was no difference between the sexes in foveal pit morphology; however, the Africans/African Americans had significantly deeper and broader foveal pits than the Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have reported race- and sex-associated differences in macular thickness, and the inference has been that these differences represent similar anatomic features. However, the data on pit morphology collected in the present study reveal an important and significant variation. Between the sexes, the differences are due to global variability in retinal thickness, whereas the variation in thickness observed between the races appears to be driven by differences in foveal pit morphology. These differences have important implications for the use of SD-OCT in detecting and diagnosing retinal disease.
Authors: David S Friedman; Roger C W Wolfs; Benita J O'Colmain; Barbara E Klein; Hugh R Taylor; Shelia West; M Cristina Leske; Paul Mitchell; Nathan Congdon; John Kempen Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Wolfgang Geitzenauer; Christopher G Kiss; Mary K Durbin; Maria Teresa A Abunto; Thomas M Callan; Paul F Stetson; Mark R Wieland; Neil M Bressler; Giovanni Gregori; Ursula M Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Retina Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito Journal: Science Date: 1991-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Amir H Kashani; Ingrid E Zimmer-Galler; Syed Mahmood Shah; Laurie Dustin; Diana V Do; Dean Eliott; Julia A Haller; Quan Dong Nguyen Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Reena Fotedar; Jie Jin Wang; George Burlutsky; Ian G Morgan; Kathryn Rose; Tien Y Wong; Paul Mitchell Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Nazli Demirkaya; Hille W van Dijk; Sanne M van Schuppen; Michael D Abràmoff; Mona K Garvin; Milan Sonka; Reinier O Schlingemann; Frank D Verbraak Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Anthony N Kuo; Ryan P McNabb; Stephanie J Chiu; Mays A El-Dairi; Sina Farsiu; Cynthia A Toth; Joseph A Izatt Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Ruben Jauregui; Amanda L Thomas; Benjamin Liechty; Gabriel Velez; Vinit B Mahajan; Lorraine Clark; Stephen H Tsang Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Alexander Pinhas; Moataz Razeen; Michael Dubow; Alexander Gan; Toco Y Chui; Nishit Shah; Mitul Mehta; Ronald C Gentile; Rishard Weitz; Joseph B Walsh; Yusufu N Sulai; Joseph Carroll; Alfredo Dubra; Richard B Rosen Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: S Tammy Hsu; Hoan T Ngo; Sandra S Stinnett; Nathan L Cheung; Robert J House; Michael P Kelly; Xi Chen; Laura B Enyedi; S Grace Prakalapakorn; Miguel A Materin; Mays A El-Dairi; Glenn J Jaffe; Sharon F Freedman; Cynthia A Toth; Lejla Vajzovic Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 12.079