Literature DB >> 33090598

Reference state and benchmark concepts for better biodiversity conservation in contemporary ecosystems.

Megan J McNellie1,2, Ian Oliver3, Josh Dorrough4, Simon Ferrier5, Graeme Newell6, Philip Gibbons2.   

Abstract

Measuring the status and trends of biodiversity is critical for making informed decisions about the conservation, management or restoration of species, habitats and ecosystems. Defining the reference state against which status and change are measured is essential. Typically, reference states describe historical conditions, yet historical conditions are challenging to quantify, may be difficult to falsify, and may no longer be an attainable target in a contemporary ecosystem. We have constructed a conceptual framework to help inform thinking and discussion around the philosophical underpinnings of reference states and guide their application. We characterize currently recognized historical reference states and describe them as Pre-Human, Indigenous Cultural, Pre-Intensification and Hybrid-Historical. We extend the conceptual framework to include contemporary reference states as an alternative theoretical perspective. The contemporary reference state framework is a major conceptual shift that focuses on current ecological patterns and identifies areas with higher biodiversity values relative to other locations within the same ecosystem, regardless of the disturbance history. We acknowledge that past processes play an essential role in driving contemporary patterns of diversity. The specific context for which we design the contemporary conceptual frame is underpinned by an overarching goal-to maximize biodiversity conservation and restoration outcomes in existing ecosystems. The contemporary reference state framework can account for the inherent differences in the diversity of biodiversity values (e.g. native species richness, habitat complexity) across spatial scales, communities and ecosystems. In contrast to historical reference states, contemporary references states are measurable and falsifiable. This 'road map of reference states' offers perspective needed to define and assess the status and trends in biodiversity and habitats. We demonstrate the contemporary reference state concept with an example from south-eastern Australia. Our framework provides a tractable way for policy-makers and practitioners to navigate biodiversity assessments to maximize conservation and restoration outcomes in contemporary ecosystems.
© 2020 Commonwealth of Australia. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benchmark; composition; conceptual framework; conservation; reference state; restoration; structure; vegetation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33090598      PMCID: PMC7756865          DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  47 in total

1.  Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment.

Authors:  D Tilman; P B Reich; J Knops; D Wedin; T Mielke; C Lehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines.

Authors:  Stuart H M Butchart; Matt Walpole; Ben Collen; Arco van Strien; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Rosamunde E A Almond; Jonathan E M Baillie; Bastian Bomhard; Claire Brown; John Bruno; Kent E Carpenter; Geneviève M Carr; Janice Chanson; Anna M Chenery; Jorge Csirke; Nick C Davidson; Frank Dentener; Matt Foster; Alessandro Galli; James N Galloway; Piero Genovesi; Richard D Gregory; Marc Hockings; Valerie Kapos; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Fiona Leverington; Jonathan Loh; Melodie A McGeoch; Louise McRae; Anahit Minasyan; Monica Hernández Morcillo; Thomasina E E Oldfield; Daniel Pauly; Suhel Quader; Carmen Revenga; John R Sauer; Benjamin Skolnik; Dian Spear; Damon Stanwell-Smith; Simon N Stuart; Andy Symes; Megan Tierney; Tristan D Tyrrell; Jean-Christophe Vié; Reg Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Measurement and meaningfulness in conservation science.

Authors:  Abel G Wolman
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 4.  Historical baselines for large marine animals.

Authors:  Heike K Lotze; Boris Worm
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Reconstructing temporal trends in heavy metal deposition: assessing the value of herbarium moss samples.

Authors:  L Shotbolt; P Büker; M R Ashmore
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Forest extent and deforestation in tropical Africa since 1900.

Authors:  Julie C Aleman; Marta A Jarzyna; A Carla Staver
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Defining historical baselines for conservation: ecological changes since European settlement on Vancouver Island, Canada.

Authors:  Anne D Bjorkman; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Expert status and performance.

Authors:  Mark A Burgman; Marissa McBride; Raquel Ashton; Andrew Speirs-Bridge; Louisa Flander; Bonnie Wintle; Fiona Fidler; Libby Rumpff; Charles Twardy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Historical and contemporary indigenous marine conservation strategies in the North Pacific.

Authors:  Natalie C Ban; Emma Wilson; Doug Neasloss
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  Effects of spatial autocorrelation and sampling design on estimates of protected area effectiveness.

Authors:  Pablo Jose Negret; Moreno Di Marco; Laura J Sonter; Jonathan Rhodes; Hugh P Possingham; Martine Maron
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 6.560

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Reference state and benchmark concepts for better biodiversity conservation in contemporary ecosystems.

Authors:  Megan J McNellie; Ian Oliver; Josh Dorrough; Simon Ferrier; Graeme Newell; Philip Gibbons
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 10.863

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.