Qian Luo1, Avi Dor2,3, Patricia Pittman1. 1. The Fitzhugh Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 2. Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 3. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore optimal workforce configurations in the production of care quality in community health centers (CHCs), accounting for interactions among occupational categories, as well as contributions to the volume of services. DATA SOURCES: We linked the Uniform Data System from 2014 to 2016 with Internal Revenue Service nonprofit tax return data. The final database contained 3139 center-year observations from 1178 CHCs. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated a system of two generalized linear production functions, with quality of care and volume of services as outputs, using the average percent of diabetic patients with controlled A1C level and hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure as quality measures. To explore the substitutability and complementarity between staffing categories, we estimated a revenue function. FINDINGS: Primary care physicians and advanced practice clinicians achieve similar quality outcomes (3.2 percent and 3.0 percent improvement in chronic condition management per full-time equivalent (FTE), respectively). Advanced practice clinicians generate less revenue per FTE but are generally less costly to employ. CONCLUSION: As quality incentives are further integrated into payment systems, CHCs will need to optimize their workforce configuration to improve quality. Given the relative efficiency of advanced practice clinicians in producing quality, further hiring of these professionals is a cost-effective investment for CHCs.
OBJECTIVE: To explore optimal workforce configurations in the production of care quality in community health centers (CHCs), accounting for interactions among occupational categories, as well as contributions to the volume of services. DATA SOURCES: We linked the Uniform Data System from 2014 to 2016 with Internal Revenue Service nonprofit tax return data. The final database contained 3139 center-year observations from 1178 CHCs. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated a system of two generalized linear production functions, with quality of care and volume of services as outputs, using the average percent of diabetic patients with controlled A1C level and hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure as quality measures. To explore the substitutability and complementarity between staffing categories, we estimated a revenue function. FINDINGS: Primary care physicians and advanced practice clinicians achieve similar quality outcomes (3.2 percent and 3.0 percent improvement in chronic condition management per full-time equivalent (FTE), respectively). Advanced practice clinicians generate less revenue per FTE but are generally less costly to employ. CONCLUSION: As quality incentives are further integrated into payment systems, CHCs will need to optimize their workforce configuration to improve quality. Given the relative efficiency of advanced practice clinicians in producing quality, further hiring of these professionals is a cost-effective investment for CHCs.
Authors: Ellen T Kurtzman; Burt S Barnow; Jean E Johnson; Samuel J Simmens; Donna Lind Infeld; Fitzhugh Mullan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Avi Dor; Qian Luo; Maya Tuchman Gerstein; Floyd Malveaux; Herman Mitchell; Anne Rossier Markus Journal: J Ambul Care Manage Date: 2018 Jul/Sep
Authors: Monica S Aswani; Meredith L Kilgore; David J Becker; David T Redden; Bisakha Sen; Justin Blackburn Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 3.402