Literature DB >> 33088861

Reliability of Postoperative Radiographies in Ankle Fractures.

Mohammadreza Abbasian1,2, Farsad Biglari3, Mehrdad Sadighi3, Adel Ebrahimpour3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of reduction of ankle fractures using postoperative plain radiographies (x-ray) remains widely controversial. Some authors have demonstrated that postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan can be useful for these patients. In current study, the efficacy of x-rays after fixation of ankle fractures was investigated based on the CT scan findings.
METHODS: A total of 73 patients with ankle fractures who were subjected to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were enrolled. After surgery, if the reduction was acceptable based on the x-rays according to standard measurements, the patient was referred for CT scanning. Forty four patients were included in the study. Undesirable CT scan findings including malreduction of fragments or articular surfaces, device malpositioning, missed fractures, and undetected intra-articular fragments were documented.
RESULTS: Undesirable CT findings were seen in 25 patients (56.8%). CT scan showed acceptable reduction without device malpositioning in 19 patients. The most prevalent findings in CT images were malreduction and device malpositioning in 17 and 16 patients, respectively. There was no abnormal finding in CT imaging of lateral malleolar fractures. In two thirds of the injured syndesmosis, device malpositioning, and malreduction were detected in CT scan.
CONCLUSION: Despite acceptable postoperative x-rays, a considerable number of patients with ankle fractures had inappropriate reduction or undesirable findings in their postoperative CT scan. It seems necessary to use CT scan after ORIF of ankle fractures in order to examine the accuracy of reduction. Further validation of postoperative CT scan in ankle fracture surgery should be investigated. 2020 © BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle fracture; alreduction; evice malpositioning; lain radiography; omputed tomography; yndesmosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33088861      PMCID: PMC7547165          DOI: 10.22038/abjs.2020.43134.2173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  31 in total

1.  Plantar flexion influences radiographic measurements of the ankle mortise.

Authors:  Nelson S Saldua; James F Harris; Lance E LeClere; Paul J Girard; Joseph R Carney
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review.

Authors:  Charles M Court-Brown; Ben Caesar
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model.

Authors:  D B Thordarson; S Motamed; T Hedman; E Ebramzadeh; S Bakshian
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Roentgenographic evaluation of the tibiotalar joint.

Authors:  T G Goergen; L A Danzig; D Resnick; C A Owen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  Spiros G Pneumaticos; Philip C Noble; Sofia N Chatziioannou; Saul G Trevino
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; J Lu; H Yang; A O Mekhail; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  H Claude Sagi; Anjan R Shah; Roy W Sanders
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Arthroscopically assisted treatment of ankle fractures: arthroscopic findings and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Atsushi Ono; Shinji Nishikawa; Akihiko Nagao; Tomoyuki Irie; Motoshige Sasaki; Teruo Kouno
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Position of the distal fibular fragment in pronation and supination ankle fractures: a CT evaluation.

Authors:  Chris W Tang; Nikolaos Roidis; Suketu Vaishnav; Anand Patel; David B Thordarson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Quantitative criteria for prediction of the results after displaced fracture of the ankle.

Authors:  F A Pettrone; M Gail; D Pee; T Fitzpatrick; L B Van Herpe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intraoperative Chertsey Test, is it a Reliable Alternative to Computed Tomography Scan for Diagnosing Syndesmotic Injuries of the Ankle?

Authors:  Shahram Sayyadi; Mohammad Mahdi Omidian; Ali Pourmojarab; Abouzar Khodayi; Mojtaba Baroutkoub; Sohrab Salimi; Alireza Manafi Rasi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2022-03-01

2.  A Quantitative Method for Intraoperative Evaluation of Distal Fibular Malrotation.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Zihua Li; Fajiao Xiao; Jiang Xia; Bing Li; Tao Yu; Youguang Zhao; Haichao Zhou; Wenbao He; Zhendong Li; Yunfeng Yang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.