Literature DB >> 33088642

Patient decision aids in clinical practice for people with diabetes: a scoping review.

Jodie Cornelius1, Frances Doran2, Elaine Jefford2, Nasim Salehi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with diabetes need to make regular choices that influence their long-term morbidity and mortality. Patient decision aids are validated tools and when used collaboratively between healthcare professionals, patients and carers, can help guide value-based discussions which encourage choices that are well informed and personally relevant.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the use and effect of patient decision aids in the management of diabetes.
METHOD: A scoping review design was used. Medline, ProQuest, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 1998 and December 2018.
RESULTS: Patient decision aids are not commonly or widely used in diabetes management. They offer a suitable adjunct to practice within the domains of healthcare knowledge, active participation, and communication, and shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals.
CONCLUSION: Patient decision aids can offer a simple and easy-to-use method to potentially improve diabetes health literacy, through the process of shared decision-making and two-way conversations. However, there are current limitations on using them to positively influence clinical outcomes or long-term changes in self-care behaviors within the management of diabetes. Further research to explore the validity of using patient decision aids long term in these areas is required. © The Japan Diabetes Society 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Health education; Patient choice; Patient decision aid(s); Shared decision-making

Year:  2020        PMID: 33088642      PMCID: PMC7538483          DOI: 10.1007/s13340-020-00429-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetol Int        ISSN: 2190-1678


  40 in total

Review 1.  What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.

Authors:  Kathy Davis; Nick Drey; Dinah Gould
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.837

2.  Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: a theory analysis.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; France Légaré; Sophie Pouliot; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Sandy Dunn
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-11-30

Review 3.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Effects of a patient oriented decision aid for prioritising treatment goals in diabetes: pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Petra Denig; Jan Schuling; Flora Haaijer-Ruskamp; Jaco Voorham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-09-25

5.  Diabetes Australia position statement. A new language for diabetes: improving communications with and about people with diabetes.

Authors:  J Speight; J Conn; T Dunning; T C Skinner
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.602

6.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.

Authors:  Danielle Levac; Heather Colquhoun; Kelly K O'Brien
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; John E Wennberg; France Legare; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Benjamin W Moulton; Karen R Sepucha; Andrea G Sodano; Jaime S King
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Comparing perceived self-management practices of adult type 2 diabetic patients after completion of a structured ADA certified diabetes self-management education program with unstructured individualized nurse practitioner led diabetes self-management education.

Authors:  Dennis S Wooley; Tracy J Kinner
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.257

Review 9.  Understanding adherence to medications in type 2 diabetes care and clinical trials to overcome barriers: a narrative review.

Authors:  Margaret Tiktin; Selda Celik; Lori Berard
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.580

10.  A treatment decision aid may increase patient trust in the diabetes specialist. The Statin Choice randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael R Nannenga; Victor M Montori; Audrey J Weymiller; Steven A Smith; Teresa J H Christianson; Sandra C Bryant; Amiram Gafni; Cathy Charles; Rebecca J Mullan; Lesley A Jones; Enrique R Bolona; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.