Literature DB >> 19328488

What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.

Kathy Davis1, Nick Drey, Dinah Gould.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scoping studies are increasingly undertaken as distinct activities. The interpretation, methodology and expectations of scoping are highly variable. This suggests that conceptually, scoping is a poorly defined ambiguous term. The distinction between scoping as an integral preliminary process in the development of a research proposal or a formative, methodologically rigorous activity in its own right has not been extensively examined. AIMS: The aim of this review is to explore the nature and status of scoping studies within the nursing literature and develop a working definition to ensure consistency in the future use of scoping as a research related activity.
DESIGN: This paper follows an interpretative scoping review methodology. DATA SOURCES: An explicit systematic search strategy included literary and web-based key word searches and advice from key researchers. Electronic sources included bibliographic and national research register databases and a general browser.
RESULTS: The scoping studies varied widely in terms of intent, procedural and methodological rigor. An atheoretical stance was common although explicit conceptual clarification and development of a topic was limited. Four different levels of inquiry ranging from preliminary descriptive surveys to more substantive conceptual approaches were conceptualised. These levels reflected differing dimensional distinctions in which some activities constitute research whereas in others the scoping activities appear to fall outside the remit of research. Reconnaissance emerges as a common synthesising construct to explain the purpose of scoping.
CONCLUSIONS: Scoping studies in relation to nursing are embryonic and continue to evolve. Its main strengths lie in its ability to extract the essence of a diverse body of evidence giving it meaning and significance that is both developmental and intellectually creative. As with other approaches to research and evidence synthesis a more standardized approach is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19328488     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  132 in total

1.  Managing large-volume literature searches in research synthesis studies.

Authors:  Nancy L Havill; Jennifer Leeman; Julia Shaw-Kokot; Kathleen Knafl; Jamie Crandell; Margarete Sandelowski
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 2.  A scoping review of peer-led interventions following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Linda Barclay; Gillean Mary Hilton
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Scoping reviews: establishing the role of the librarian.

Authors:  Martin Morris; Jill T Boruff; Genevieve C Gore
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-10

4.  Using scoping review methods to describe current capacity and prescribe change in Canadian SCI rehabilitation service delivery.

Authors:  Catharine Craven; Christina Balioussis; Molly C Verrier; Jane T Hsieh; Erin Cherban; Amir Rasheed; Vanessa Noonan; Dalton Wolfe
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Evaluating communities of practice and knowledge networks: a systematic scoping review of evaluation frameworks.

Authors:  Kaileah A McKellar; Kristen B Pitzul; Juliana Y Yi; Donald C Cole
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 6.  Newborn Outcomes and Maternity Waiting Homes in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Julie M Buser; Jody R Lori
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-04

Review 7.  Educational standards for training paramedics in ultrasound: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ben Meadley; Alexander Olaussen; Ashleigh Delorenzo; Nick Roder; Caroline Martin; Toby St Clair; Andrew Burns; Emma Stam; Brett Williams
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2017-06-17

Review 8.  A Scoping Review of Self-Management Interventions Following Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Amanda McIntyre; Stephanie L Marrocco; Samantha A McRae; Lindsay Sleeth; Sander Hitzig; Susan Jaglal; Gary Linassi; Sarah Munce; Dalton L Wolfe
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2020

9.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.

Authors:  Danielle Levac; Heather Colquhoun; Kelly K O'Brien
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  The Hidden Curricula of Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Carlton Lawrence; Tsholofelo Mhlaba; Kearsley A Stewart; Relebohile Moletsane; Bernhard Gaede; Mosa Moshabela
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.