| Literature DB >> 33088497 |
Georgios Solomou1, Adikarige Haritha Dulanka Silva2, Adrianna Wong3, Ute Pohl4, Nikolaos Tzerakis5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Melanotic schwannoma is a rare variant of schwannoma. Extramedullary melanotic schwannoma originates in the vicinity of nerve roots mimicking other intervertebral disc disorders. Therefore, T1 and T2-weighted MRI sequences become an essential tool for diagnosis. Aside from case reports, no large studies exist to provide consensus on the signal intensities in T1 and T2-weighted MR imaging. Moreover, no clear evidence is available to delineate prognosis. Here, a case report is presented together with a subsequent systematic review of the literature regarding this rare entity. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 45-year old female presented with a one-year history of insidious onset of neck pain and paraesthesia. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed an extramedullary lesion along the C6 nerve root with T1-weighted hyperintensity and T2-weighted hypointensity. Despite two surgical decompressions and adjuvant immunotherapy, the patient unfortunately passed away due to metastatic progression. DISCUSSION: According to the systematic review conducted, in over half of the cases of extramedullary melanotic schwannoma, there is local reoccurrence and/or distal metastasis. Moreover, in 64.7% and 70.6% of the cases, the T1-weighted image of the lesion appears hyperintense and hypointense on a T2-weighted image, respectively. It is an aggressive variant of schwannoma, one of the most commonly observed extramedullary tumours presenting to neurosurgical practice.Entities:
Keywords: Extramedullary; Malignant; Melanotic; Metastatic; Schwannoma
Year: 2020 PMID: 33088497 PMCID: PMC7559563 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Fig. 1A) Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in T2 (superior plates) and T1 (inferior plates) weighted imaging sequences. Axial (left) and Sagittal (right) sequences presented. The left-sided dumbbell shaped lesion is visualised extending through the intervertebral foramen with both intra-dural intra-canalicular and extra-dural extra-canalicular elements. The T1 weighted sequence demonstrates the characteristic ‘target’ sign with central hypo-intensity with circumferential peripheral enhancement. b) Post-operative MRI in similar configuration demonstrating near total excision of the lesion. A small focus of contrast-enhancement intra-dural and intra-canalicular is visualised representing possible residual remnant.
Fig. 2A) HE ×100 mag.: Heavily pigmented spindle cell neoplasm with epithelioid component (bottom) and necrosis (top). Psammoma bodies are absent. b) Ki67 × 40 mag.: Nuclear labelling index amounts to ~25% throughout [3 mitoses in one high power field (×40 objective), not illustrated]. c) MelanA x 200 mag.: Small clusters of immunopositive cells (on the right). In contrast, heavy intrinsic pigmentation on the left. Tumour cells contain oval, prominently nucleolated nuclei and well-defined basophilic cytoplasm with finely granular pigment consistent with neuromelanin. d) Reticulin x 100 mag. [b]: Prominent pericellular reticulin deposition overall but focal clusters of tumour cells (centre) lack pericellular wrapping. Inset: Prominent pericellular deposition in spindle cell areas.
Shows the number of MeS cases found in the literature. Level of lesion, age, gender, metastatic potential and T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI imaging findings.
| Level | Gender | Age | Reference | Metastasis | Region | MRI T1 | MRI T2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | M | 34 | [ | yes | Local and distal | – | – |
| C1 | – | – | [ | – | – | – | – |
| C1 | M | 54 | [ | no | N/A | hyperintense | hypointense |
| C2 | F | 30 | [ | yes | local | hyperintense | |
| C2-3 | F | 66 | [ | – | |||
| C2-3 | F | 35 | [ | yes | Local and distal | – | – |
| C4 | M | 36 | [ | yes | distal | ||
| C4 | – | – | [ | – | – | – | – |
| C4-5 | F | 32 | [ | yes | distal | hyperintense | hypointense |
| C5-6 | F | 53 | [ | no | N/A | isointense | hyperintense |
| C6 | F | 26 | [ | no | N/A | – | – |
| C6-7 | M | 27 | [ | yes | local | – | – |
| C7 | M | 64 | [ | yes | Local and distal | hyperintense | hypointense |
| C8 | F | 49 | [ | – | |||
| C8 | F | 49 | [ | no | N/A | – | – |
| T1-T1 | F | 17 | [ | no | N/A | hyperintense | hypointense |
| T2 | F | 45 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| T2 | F | 12 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| T2-4 | M | 47 | [ | no | N/A | hyperintense | hypointense |
| T3 | F | 40 | [ | no | N/A | ||
| T5 | M | 38 | [ | no | N/A | – | – |
| T6-7 | M | 40 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| T6 | M | 34 | [ | yes | distal | – | – |
| T6-8 | F | 65 | [ | yes | local | hyperintense | – |
| T7 | M | 59 | [ | yes | local | ||
| T7 | M | 25 | [ | yes | Local and distal | hyperintense | hypointense |
| T7 | M | 61 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| T8-12 | M | 67 | [ | no | N/A | hyperintense | hypointense |
| T9 | M | 43 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| T9-10 | M | 53 | [ | no | N/A | hyperintense | hypointense |
| T10 | F | 58 | [ | – | |||
| T12-L1 | F | 17 | [ | no | N/A | – | – |
| T12-L2 | – | – | [ | – | – | – | – |
| L1 | F | 23 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| L1 | M | 32 | [ | no | N/A | – | – |
| L1-2 | M | 43 | [ | no | N/A | hypointense | hyperintense |
| L1-2 | M | 22 | [ | no | N/A | hypointense | hyperintense |
| L1-2 | F | 75 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| L2 | M | 42 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| L2 | M | 37 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| L1-5 | F | 35 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| L3 | F | 70 | [ | – | |||
| L3 | F | 46 | [ | yes | local | hyperintense | hyperintense |
| L3-5 | F | 35 | [ | yes | Local and distal | – | – |
| L4 | M | 59 | [ | yes | Local and distal | – | – |
| L4 | F | 40 | [ | yes | Distal and local | – | – |
| L4-5 | M | 60 | [ | – | – | hyperintense | hypointense |
| L5 | M | 27 | [ | yes | distal | – | – |
| L5-S1 | M | 28 | [ | yes | Local and distal | hyperintense | – |
| L5-S1 | M | 36 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| L5-S1 | M | 33 | [ | yes | Local and distal | – | – |
| L5-S1 | F | 36 | [ | yes | local | hyperintense | mixed |
| S1 | F | 26 | [ | no | N/A | – | – |
| S1 | M | 36 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| S1 | F | 63 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| S1 | F | 41 | [ | no | N/A | – | – |
| Level Unknown | |||||||
| N/A | M | 46 | [ | no | N/A | – | – |
| N/A | – | – | [ | no | N/A | – | – |
| N/A | F | 56 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| N/A | M | 58 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| N/A | M | 32 | [ | – | – | – | – |
| N/A | M | 35 | – | – | – | – | |
| N/A | M | – | [ | – | – | mixed | hypointense |
| N/A | M | – | [ | – | – | mixed | hypointense |
| N/A | F | – | [ | – | – | mixed | hypointense |
No access to full article or the article was not available in English.
Fig. 3Percentage of patients versus age at diagnosis. Median age of presentation is 20–40 years of age.
Fig. 4Percentage of patients versus metastasis and/or local reoccurrence. The majority of the cases show metastasis and/or local reoccurrence.
Fig. 5Percentage of patients with T1 & T2 MRI available versus signal intensity per sequence.