| Literature DB >> 33088331 |
Ju-Ying Jiang1, Yu-Sen Peng2,3,4, Yi-Fang Chuang5, Yen-Ling Chiu6,2,7, Wan-Chuan Tsai2,8, Ruo-Wei Hung2, I-Yu Chen2, Kai-Hsiang Shu2,9, Szu-Yu Pan2, Feng-Jung Yang10, Te-Tien Ting11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is an important challenge given the worldwide epidemic and is the most important cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in developed countries. It is known that patients with ESRD and advanced renal failure suffer from immunosenescence and premature T cell aging, but whether such changes develop in patients with less severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; CKD; Diabetes; Immunosenescence; T cell
Year: 2020 PMID: 33088331 PMCID: PMC7574244 DOI: 10.1186/s12979-020-00200-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immun Ageing ISSN: 1742-4933 Impact factor: 6.400
Fig. 1Correlations between immune cell number and subset with age. Bivariate Pearson’s correlation plots between immune cell number (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cells and CD68+ total monocytes), immune cell percentage (all the others) with age. Refer to supplementary Table 1 for the complete analysis result. In Fig. 1, all the p values for the plots here are statistically significant (< 0.05) with the exception of the CD68+ total monocyte cell number
Baseline demographics, clinical, and laboratory measurements stratified by CKD stage based on eGFR
| eGFR ≥60 ( | Stage 3 CKD ( | Stage 4/5 CKD ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eGFR (ml/min) | 88.3 (15.4) | 48.0 (8.0) | 19.7 (7.4) | < 0.001* |
| Age (yr) | 59.9 (10.1) | 67.7 (8.6) | 67.1 (8.2) | < 0.001* |
| Male (%) | 197 (52.0) | 61 (55.5) | 26 (76.5) | 0.022 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 130.5 (16.5) | 135.4 (16.8) | 132.8 (13.5) | 0.019 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 71.9 (11.6) | 70.4 (12.8) | 70.4 (11.2) | 0.44 |
| Albumin (g/dl) | 4.5 (0.3) | 4.4 (0.3) | 4.1 (0.5) | < 0.001* |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.8 (0.2) | 1.4 (0.3) | 3.6 (2.0) | < 0.001* |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.2 (1.0) | 7.3 (1.1) | 7.1 (1.0) | 0.41 |
| AC sugar (mg/dl) | 137.7 (37.4) | 145.9 (61.6) | 124.7 (31.6) | 0.034* |
| Use of insulin (%) | 93 (24.5) | 49 (44.5) | 22 (64.7) | < 0.001* |
| Use of sulfonylurea (%) | 167 (44.1) | 46 (41.8) | 8 (23.5) | 0.067 |
| Usage of metformin (%) | 320 (84.4) | 49 (44.5) | ** | < 0.001 |
| Use of DPP4i (%) | 164 (43.3) | 51 (46.4) | 13 (38.2) | 0.69 |
| Use of SGLT2i (%) | 43 (11.3) | ** | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| T-Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 145.1 (30.8) | 143.6 (26.2) | 141.0 (25.3) | 0.70 |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 87.4 (25.1) | 83.8 (26.0) | 82.4 (20.8) | 0.27 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 136.6 (109.4) | 162.8 (103.0) | 157.7 (104.7) | 0.060 |
| hs-CRP (mg/dl) | 0.21 (0.32) | 0.47 (1.12) | 0.33 (0.61) | < 0.001* |
Demographic and clinic data were compared between eGFR groups. Continuous variables are described as mean (SD) for parametric variables and median (interquartile range) for nonparametric variables, unless otherwise indicated. The P values were calculated using one-way ANOVA for continuous variables and X2 tests for categorical variables. Values are expressed as means (SD). *: p value < 0.05. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate derived from the CKD-EPI formula. Stage 3 CKD, eGFR between 30 and 60; stage 4 CKD, eGFR between 15 and 30; stage 5 CKD, eGFR less than 15. DPP4i: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor. SGLT2i: sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor. **cell number < 5
Immune cell number and phenotype comparisons by CKD stage
| eGFR ≥60 ( | Stage 3 CKD ( | Stage 4/5 CKD ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number CD3+ | 1023.2 (418.1) | 964.8 (447.5) | 788.0 (311.2) | 0.005* |
| Number CD4+ | 604.4 (277.0) | 555.3 (248.7) | 450.1 (200.7) | 0.003* |
| Number CD8+ | 282.8 (158.6) | 293.1 (190.4) | 221.4 (134.0) | 0.079 |
| CD4+ TNAIVE (%) | 37.7 (14.1) | 38.6 (15.6) | 39.1 (16.7) | 0.78 |
| CD4+ TEFF (%) | 3.2 (3.9) | 3.3 (3.8) | 4.7 (4.8) | 0.093 |
| CD4+ CD127+ (%) | 92.4 (5.3) | 90.7 (6.9) | 88.4 (7.1) | < 0.001* |
| CD4+ CD28- (%) | 7.1 (8.3) | 9.0 (9.1) | 7.9 (6.3) | 0.12 |
| CD4+ CD57+ (%) | 4.2 (4.8) | 5.3 (5.9) | 5.1 (5.6) | 0.096 |
| CD8+ TNAIVE (%) | 22.9 (12.5) | 19.9 (12.3) | 18.5 (10.4) | 0.02* |
| CD8+ TEFF (%) | 31.5 (17.5) | 38.8 (19.4) | 38.9 (19.6) | < 0.001* |
| CD8+ CD127+ (%) | 55.1 (16.3) | 46.9 (16.6) | 47.8 (14.5) | < 0.001* |
| CD8+ CD28- (%) | 45.2 (17.7) | 54.8 (17.2) | 53.8 (18.2) | < 0.001* |
| CD8+ CD57+ (%) | 27.3 (17.4) | 33.1 (20.5) | 33.7 (18.0) | 0.003* |
| Number CD68+ | 378.0 (146.7) | 412.0 (162.8) | 383.2 (159.4) | 0.12 |
| Monocyte 1 (%) | 75.2 (8.9) | 75.3 (9.9) | 76.5 (9.1) | 0.74 |
| Monocyte 2 (%) | 3.7 (1.7) | 3.8 (2.4) | 3.7 (1.9) | 0.76 |
| Monocyte 3 (%) | 10.7 (4.7) | 10.8 (7.0) | 10.2 (5.7) | 0.85 |
Immune cell profiles were compared between eGFR groups. P values were calculated using one-way ANOVA. For cell subsets, the percentage of the mother cell population was used for comparison instead of cell numbers. Values are expressed as means (SD). *: p value < 0.05. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate derived from the CKD-EPI formula. Stage 3 CKD, eGFR between 30 and 60; stage 4 CKD, eGFR between 15 and 30; stage 5 CKD, eGFR less than 15. Monocyte 1: classical monocytes. Monocyte 2: intermediate monocytes. Monocyte 3: non-classical monocyte
Immune cell number and phenotype by CKD stage in age and sex-adjusted regression models
| Stage 3 CKD | Stage 4/5 CKD | p for trend | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number CD3+ | −18.09 | 0.68 | − 163.13 | 0.021* | 0.053 |
| Number CD4+ | −20.49 | 0.46 | −110.87 | 0.013* | 0.024* |
| Number CD8+ | 21.21 | 0.21 | −37.09 | 0.17 | 0.73 |
| CD4+ TNAIVE (%) | 1.75 | 0.29 | 2.19 | 0.41 | 0.23 |
| CD4+ TEFF (%) | −0.31 | 0.33 | 1.09 | 0.032* | 0.29 |
| CD4+ CD127+ (%) | −0.72 | 0.19 | −3.21 | < 0.001* | 0.001* |
| CD4+ CD28- (%) | 0.7 | 0.33 | 1.1 | 0.33 | 0.21 |
| CD4+ CD57+ (%) | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.32 | 0.65 | 0.46 |
| CD8+ TNAIVE (%) | −2.59 | 0.045* | −3.24 | 0.12 | 0.024* |
| CD8+ TEFF (%) | 4.96 | 0.015* | 4.9 | 0.14 | 0.015* |
| CD8+ CD127+ (%) | −4.66 | 0.009* | −3.59 | 0.21 | 0.019* |
| CD8+ CD28- (%) | 6.04 | 0.002* | 5.14 | 0.1 | 0.004* |
| CD8+ CD57+ (%) | 3.45 | 0.041* | 4.6 | 0.089 | 0.018* |
| Number CD68+ | 23.5 | 0.16 | 0.43 | 0.99 | 0.45 |
| Monocyte 1 (%) | 0.54 | 0.55 | 2.17 | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Monocyte 2 (%) | −0.19 | 0.29 | −0.25 | 0.38 | 0.22 |
| Monocyte 3 (%) | −0.78 | 0.13 | −1.24 | 0.13 | 0.053 |
Age and sex-adjusted multivariable regression models and trend analyses to test the independent associations between immune profile and CKD stages. *: P value < 0.05. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate derived from the CKD-EPI formula. Stage 3 CKD, eGFR between 30 and 60; stage 4 CKD, eGFR between 15 and 30; stage 5 CKD, eGFR less than 15. Monocyte 1: classical monocytes. Monocyte 2: intermediate monocytes. Monocyte 3: non-classical monocyte
Effects of BMI on immunosenescence in multivariable-adjusted regression models
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD4+ TNAIVE (%) | −0.13 | 0.36 | −0.19 | 0.20 |
| CD4+ TEFF (%) | 0.0062 | 0.82 | 0.0081 | 0.77 |
| CD4+ CD127+ (%) | −0.056 | 0.26 | −0.038 | 0.44 |
| CD4+ CD28- (%) | 0.082 | 0.19 | 0.073 | 0.25 |
| CD4+ CD57+ (%) | 0.027 | 0.48 | 0.023 | 0.56 |
| CD8+ TNAIVE (%) | −0.20 | 0.083 | −0.17 | 0.15 |
| CD8+ TEFF (%) | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.28 |
| CD8+ CD127+ (%) | −0.25 | 0.12 | −0.19 | 0.23 |
| CD8+ CD28- (%) | 0.37 | 0.033* | 0.30 | 0.087 |
| CD8+ CD57+ (%) | 0.42 | 0.0049* | 0.37 | 0.017* |
Multivariable regression models to test the independent associations between immune profile and BMI. *: P value < 0.05. BMI: Body Mass Index. Monocyte 1: classical monocytes. Monocyte 2: intermediate monocytes. Monocyte 3: non-classical monocyte