| Literature DB >> 33086468 |
Siti Fadziyah Mohamad Asri1, Ima Nirwana Soelaiman2, Mohamad Aris Mohd Moklas1, Nurul Huda Mohd Nor1, Nurul Hayati Mohamad Zainal1, Elvy Suhana Mohd Ramli3.
Abstract
Glucocorticoids are one of the causes of secondary osteoporosis. The aqueous extract of Piper sarmentosum contains flavonoids that possess antioxidant effects. In this study, we determined the effects of aqueous Piper sarmentosum leaf extract on structural, dynamic and static histomorphometric changes from osteoporotic bones of rats induced with glucocorticoids. Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were divided equally into four groups-Sham control group given vehicles (intramuscular (IM) olive oil and oral normal saline); AC: Adrenalectomised (Adrx) control group given IM dexamethasone (DEX) (120 μg/kg/day) and vehicle (oral normal saline); AP: Adrx group administered IM DEX (120 μg/kg/day) and aqueous Piper sarmentosum leaf extract (125 mg/kg/day) orally; and AG: Adrx group administered IM DEX (120 μg/kg/day) and oral glycyrrhizic acid (GCA) (120 mg/kg/day). Histomorphometric measurements showed that the bone volume, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, osteoid and osteoblast surfaces, double-labelled trabecular surface, mineralizing surface and bone formation rate of rats given aqueous Piper sarmentosum leaf extract were significantly increased (p < 0.05), whereas the trabecular separation and osteoclast surface were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). This study suggests that aqueous Piper sarmentosum leaf extract was able to prevent bone loss in prolonged glucocorticoid therapy. Thus, Piper sarmentosum has the potential to be used as an alternative medicine against osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in patients undergoing long-term glucocorticoid therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Piper sarmentosum; glucocorticoid; histomorphometry; osteoporosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33086468 PMCID: PMC7589271 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Photomicrograph of decalcified trabecular bones for structural histomorphometry parameters using von Kossa staining (50X magnification): (a) Sham; (b) AC: Adrx control given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day; (c) AP: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and aqueous Piper sarmentosum extract 125 mg/kg/day; and (d) AG: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and GCA 120 mg/kg/day.
Figure 2Photomicrograph of decalcified trabecular bones for static histomorphometry parameters using Masson–Goldner Trichrome staining (50X magnification): (a) Sham; (b) AC: Adrx control given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day; (c) AP: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and aqueous Piper sarmentosum extract 125 mg/kg/day; and (d) AG: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and GCA 120 mg/kg/day.
Figure 3Photomicrograph of undecalcified trabecular bones captured with a fluorescent microscope and displayed on a computer with Image Pro-Express software for dynamic histomorphometry parameters (100X magnification): (a) Sham; (b) AC: Adrx control given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day; (c) AP: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and aqueous Piper sarmentosum extract 125 mg/kg/day; and (d) AG: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and GCA 120 mg/kg/day.
Mean values, standard error of mean (SEM), and standard deviation (SD) of structural histomorphometric parameters.
| Parameter | Sham | AC | AP | AG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SEM | SD | Mean ± SEM | SD | Mean ± SEM | SD | Mean ± SEM | SD | |
| BV/TV (%) | 42 ± 4.53 | 11.09 | 28 ± 1.29 | 3.16 | 42 ± 1.49 | 3.66 | 40 ± 2.97 | 7.27 |
| Tb.Th (μm) | 0.51 ± 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.55 ± 0.07 | 0.16 |
| Tb.N (/μm) | 0.97 ± 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 0.12 | 1.83 ± 0.14 | 0.21 | 1.15 ± 0.15 | 0.22 |
| Tb.Sp (μm) | 0.29 ± 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.08 | 0.20 |
BV/TV: bone volume/tissue volume; Tb.Th: trabecular thickness; Tb.N: trabecular number; Tb.Sp: trabecular separation. AC: Adrx control given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day; AP: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and aqueous Piper sarmentosum extract 125 mg/kg/day; and AG: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and GCA 120 mg/kg/day.
Mean values, standard error of mean (SEM), and standard deviation (SD) of static histomorphometric parameters.
| Parameter | Sham | AC | AP | AG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SEM | SD | Mean ± SEM | SD | Mean ± SEM | SD | Mean ± SEM | SD | |
| OV/BV (%) | 15.01 ± 2.21 | 5.42 | 10.40 ± 1.08 | 2.65 | 19.85 ± 3.10 | 7.59 | 16.60 ± 3.35 | 8.21 |
| OS/BS (%) | 11.04 ± 1.08 | 2.64 | 8.63 ± 0.82 | 2.00 | 14.27 ± 1.39 | 3.41 | 14.58 ± 1.55 | 3.80 |
| Ob.S (%) | 2.51 ± 0.35 | 0.86 | 1.28 ± 0.10 | 0.25 | 2.47 ± 0.31 | 0.76 | 2.30 ± 0.29 | 0.71 |
| Oc.S (%) | 0.97 ± 0.16 | 0.39 | 1.25 ± 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.63 ± 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.72 ± 0.04 | 0.09 |
OV/BV: osteoid volume/bone volume; OS/BS: osteoid surface/bone surface; Ob.S: osteoblast surface; Oc.S: osteoclast surface. AC: Adrx control given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day; AP: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and aqueous Piper sarmentosum extract 125 mg/kg/day; and AG: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and GCA 120 mg/kg/day.
Mean values, standard error of mean (SEM), and standard deviation (SD) of dynamic histomorphometric parameters.
| Parameter | Sham | AC | AP | AG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SEM | SD | Mean ± SEM | SD | Mean ± SEM | SD | Mean ± SEM | SD | |
| sLS/BS (%) | 4.06 ± 0.24 | 0.59 | 2.57 ± 0.26 | 0.64 | 3.80 ± 0.29 | 0.70 | 3.66 ± 0.28 | 0.69 |
| dLS/BS (%) | 4.37 ± 0.42 | 1.04 | 2.68 ± 0.29 | 0.70 | 4.55 ± 0.36 | 0.87 | 4.37 ± 0.36 | 0.87 |
| MS/BS (%) | 16.19 ± 1.34 | 3.29 | 9.47 ± 1.32 | 3.22 | 18.67 ± 2.46 | 6.01 | 13.01 ± 1.43 | 3.49 |
| MAR (μm/day) | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 0.01 |
| BFR/BS (µm3/µm2/d) | 0.03 ± 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.010 | 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.006 | 0.01 |
sLS/BS: single-labelled trabecular surface; dLS/BS: double-labelled trabecular surface; MS/BS: mineralizing surface/bone surface; MAR: mineral apposition rate; BFR/BS: bone formation rate/bone surface. AC: Adrx control given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day; AP: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and aqueous Piper sarmentosum extract 125 mg/kg/day; and AG: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and GCA 120 mg/kg/day.
Figure 4Structural trabecular histomorphometry parameters after 8 weeks of treatment: (a) Bone volume (BV/TV); (b) Trabecular thickness (Tb.Th); (c) Trabecular number (Tb.N); (d) Trabecular separation (Tb.Sp). AC: Adrx control given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day; AP: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and aqueous Piper sarmentosum extract 125 mg/kg/day; and AG: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and GCA 120 mg/kg/day. Data presented as mean ± SEM. Same letters indicate significant difference between groups at p < 0.05.
Figure 5Static trabecular histomorphometry parameters after 8 weeks of treatment: (a) Osteoid volume (OV/BV); (b) Osteoid surface (OS/BS); (c) Osteoblast surface (Ob.S); (d) Osteoclast surface (Oc.S). AC: Adrx control given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day; AP: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and aqueous Piper sarmentosum extract 125 mg/kg/day; and AG: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and GCA 120 mg/kg/day. Data presented as mean ± SEM. The same letters indicate significant differences between groups at p < 0.05.
Figure 6Dynamic trabecular histomorphometry parameters after 8 weeks of treatment: (a) Single-labelled trabecular surface (sLS/BS); (b) Double-labelled trabecular surface (dLS/BS); (c) Mineralized surface (MS/BS); (d) Mineral apposition rate (MAR); (e) Bone formation rate (BFR/BS). AC: Adrx control given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day; AP: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and aqueous Piper sarmentosum extract 125 mg/kg/day; and AG: Adrx rats given IM DEX 120 μg/kg/day and GCA 120 mg/kg/day. Data presented as mean ± SEM. The same letters indicate significant differences between groups at p < 0.05.