Literature DB >> 33086375

A pooled testing strategy for identifying SARS-CoV-2 at low prevalence.

Leon Mutesa1,2, Pacifique Ndishimye2,3, Yvan Butera1,2, Jacob Souopgui1,2,4, Annette Uwineza1,2, Robert Rutayisire1,2, Ella Larissa Ndoricimpaye2, Emile Musoni2, Nadine Rujeni2, Thierry Nyatanyi2, Edouard Ntagwabira2, Muhammed Semakula2, Clarisse Musanabaganwa2, Daniel Nyamwasa2, Maurice Ndashimye2,3, Eva Ujeneza3, Ivan Emile Mwikarago2, Claude Mambo Muvunyi2, Jean Baptiste Mazarati2, Sabin Nsanzimana2, Neil Turok5,6,7, Wilfred Ndifon8.   

Abstract

Suppressing infections of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) will probably require the rapid identification and isolation of individuals infected with the virus on an ongoing basis. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests are accurate but costly, which makes the regular testing of every individual expensive. These costs are a challenge for all countries around the world, but particularly for low-to-middle-income countries. Cost reductions can be achieved by pooling (or combining) subsamples and testing them in groups1-7. A balance must be struck between increasing the group size and retaining test sensitivity, as sample dilution increases the likelihood of false-negative test results for individuals with a low viral load in the sampled region at the time of the test8. Similarly, minimizing the number of tests to reduce costs must be balanced against minimizing the time that testing takes, to reduce the spread of the infection. Here we propose an algorithm for pooling subsamples based on the geometry of a hypercube that, at low prevalence, accurately identifies individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 in a small number of tests and few rounds of testing. We discuss the optimal group size and explain why, given the highly infectious nature of the disease, largely parallel searches are preferred. We report proof-of-concept experiments in which a positive subsample was detected even when diluted 100-fold with negative subsamples (compared with 30-48-fold dilutions described in previous studies9-11). We quantify the loss of sensitivity due to dilution and discuss how it may be mitigated by the frequent re-testing of groups, for example. With the use of these methods, the cost of mass testing could be reduced by a large factor. At low prevalence, the costs decrease in rough proportion to the prevalence. Field trials of our approach are under way in Rwanda and South Africa. The use of group testing on a massive scale to monitor infection rates closely and continually in a population, along with the rapid and effective isolation of people with SARS-CoV-2 infections, provides a promising pathway towards the long-term control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33086375     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2885-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  41 in total

1.  Positively Correlated Samples Save Pooled Testing Costs.

Authors:  Yi-Jheng Lin; Che-Hao Yu; Tzu-Hsuan Liu; Cheng-Shang Chang; Wen-Tsuen Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng       Date:  2021-05-20

2.  Capturing the pool dilution effect in group testing regression: A Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Stella Self; Christopher McMahan; Stefani Mokalled
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 3.  Community engagement in epigenomic and neurocognitive research on post-traumatic stress disorder in Rwandans exposed to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi: lessons learned.

Authors:  Clarisse Musanabaganwa; Stefan Jansen; Agaz Wani; Alex Rugamba; Jean Mutabaruka; Eugene Rutembesa; Annette Uwineza; Segun Fatumo; Erno J Hermans; Jacob Souopgui; Derek E Wildman; Monica Uddin; Benno Roozendaal; Rose Njemini; Leon Mutesa
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Mass screening is a key component to fight against SARS-CoV-2 and return to normalcy.

Authors:  Zhaomin Feng; Yi Zhang; Yang Pan; Daitao Zhang; Lei Zhang; Quanyi Wang
Journal:  Med Rev (Berl)       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  Optimal Timing of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions During an Epidemic.

Authors:  Nick F D Huberts; Jacco J J Thijssen
Journal:  Eur J Oper Res       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.363

6.  Modeling and computation of multistep batch testing for infectious diseases.

Authors:  Hongshik Ahn; Haoran Jiang; Xiaolin Li
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.715

7.  Increasing SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR testing capacity by sample pooling.

Authors:  Julia Alcoba-Florez; Helena Gil-Campesino; Diego García-Martínez de Artola; Oscar Díez-Gil; Agustín Valenzuela-Fernández; Rafaela González-Montelongo; Laura Ciuffreda; Carlos Flores
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Test Groups, Not Individuals: A Review of the Pooling Approaches for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis.

Authors:  Renato Millioni; Cinzia Mortarino
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-04

9.  Efficient SARS-CoV-2 surveillance strategies to prevent deadly outbreaks in vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Damon J A Toth; Karim Khader
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Modeling population-wide testing of SARS-CoV-2 for containing COVID-19 pandemic in Okinawa, Japan.

Authors:  Kazuki Shimizu; Toshikazu Kuniya; Yasuharu Tokuda
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2021-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.