Literature DB >> 33085510

Effect of a Novel Smartphone Application on Breastfeeding Rates Among Low-Income, First-Time Mothers Intending to Exclusively Breastfeed: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Adam K Lewkowitz1, Julia D López2, Erika F Werner1, Megan L Ranney3, George A Macones4, Dwight J Rouse1, David A Savitz5, Alison G Cahill3.   

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of a novel smartphone application (app)-BreastFeeding Friend (BFF)-on breastfeeding rates among low-income first-time mothers planning exclusive breastfeeding.
Methods: A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomized low-income first-time mothers to BFF or control app. BFF contained breastfeeding education and videos. The control app contained digital breastfeeding handouts. Outcomes included breastfeeding rates until 6 months postpartum and patient-reported best breastfeeding resource. After enrollment, nearly half the participants reported planning formula feeding after breastfeeding initiation, potentially confounding the RCT results. In this secondary analysis, women planning formula feeding were excluded. Outcomes between study groups were compared by intent-to-treat.
Results: Of the original 170 participants, 41 in BFF and 46 in control group planned exclusively breastfeeding and were included. Exclusive breastfeeding rates were similar from 2 days postpartum (BFF: n = 19 [48.7%] versus control app: n = 21 [46.7%]; relative risk [RR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.67-1.63]) until 6 months postpartum. At 6 weeks postpartum, the majority of BFF users (n = 23 [62.2%]) believed an app provided the best breastfeeding support compared with 39% of control app users (n = 16; RR = 1.59 [95% CI = 1.01-2.52]). BFF users were 2.5 times more likely to deny having breastfeeding challenges compared with control app users (n = 12 [42.9%] versus n = 6 [16.7%]; RR = 2.57 [95% CI = 1.10-6.00]).
Conclusion: BFF reduced self-reported breastfeeding challenges and was perceived as the best breastfeeding resource at home but did not increase breastfeeding rates among low-income first-time mothers desiring to exclusively breastfeed. BFF shows promise but must be further optimized to ultimately impact breastfeeding rates. Trial Identification Number: NCT03167073.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breastfeeding; health equity; new media; postnatal breastfeeding support or education; postpartum care; smartphone application

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33085510      PMCID: PMC7826429          DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breastfeed Med        ISSN: 1556-8253            Impact factor:   1.817


  12 in total

1.  Infant Feeding Practices and Perceived Optimal Breastfeeding Interventions among Low-Income Women Delivering at a Baby-Friendly Hospital.

Authors:  Adam K Lewkowitz; Nandini Raghuraman; Julia D López; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Evaluation of a Breastfeeding App in Rural Australia: Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nikita Wheaton; Jacinta Lenehan; Lisa H Amir
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.219

3.  The Potential of Object-Relations Theory for Improving Engagement With Health Apps.

Authors:  Jonah Cohen; John Torous
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Diet quality and weight change among overweight and obese postpartum women enrolled in a behavioral intervention program.

Authors:  Gina A Wiltheiss; Cheryl A Lovelady; Deborah G West; Rebecca J N Brouwer; Katrina M Krause; Truls Østbye
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Racial and socioeconomic disparities in breastfeeding--United States, 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 6.  Primary Care Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Carrie D Patnode; Michelle L Henninger; Caitlyn A Senger; Leslie A Perdue; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Infant Feeding Practices Study II: study methods.

Authors:  Sara B Fein; Judith Labiner-Wolfe; Katherine R Shealy; Rouwei Li; Jian Chen; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

9.  Breast-feeding rates at an inner-city pediatric practice.

Authors:  Lydia Furman; Bridget C Combs; Ashley D Alexander; Mary Ann O'Riordan
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 1.168

10.  Randomization in Clinical Trials: Permuted Blocks and Stratification.

Authors:  Kristine Broglio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of Novel Breastfeeding Smartphone Applications on Breastfeeding Rates.

Authors:  Laurie B Griffin; Julia D López; Megan L Ranney; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill; Adam K Lewkowitz
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.335

2.  Risk factors for self-reported insufficient milk during the first 6 months of life: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sofia Segura-Pérez; Linda Richter; Elizabeth C Rhodes; Amber Hromi-Fiedler; Mireya Vilar-Compte; Misikir Adnew; Kate Nyhan; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.660

3.  Mother's Milk Messaging™: trial evaluation of app and texting for breastfeeding support.

Authors:  Maya Bunik; Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano; Michael Solano; Brenda L Beaty; Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga; Xuhong Zhang; Susan L Moore; Sheana Bull; Jenn A Leiferman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.105

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.