Literature DB >> 33826418

Effect of Novel Breastfeeding Smartphone Applications on Breastfeeding Rates.

Laurie B Griffin1, Julia D López2, Megan L Ranney3, George A Macones4, Alison G Cahill4, Adam K Lewkowitz1.   

Abstract

Background: Low-income women are less likely to breastfeed than high-income women. Technology-based interventions demonstrate promise in decreasing health disparities. We assessed whether increased use of breastfeeding smartphone applications (apps) impacts breastfeeding rates for low-income women. Materials and
Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized control trial (RCT), including nulliparous, low-income women. Women were randomized to one of two novel apps: control app containing digital breastfeeding handouts and BreastFeeding Friend (BFF), an interactive app containing on-demand breastfeeding educational and video content. App usage was securely tracked. The highest quartile of BFF and control app users were combined and compared to the lowest quartile of app users. The primary outcome was breastfeeding initiation. Secondary outcomes included breastfeeding outcomes and resource preferences through 6 months.
Results: In the RCT, BFF and control app median uses were 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-24) and 9 (IQR 5-19) (p = 0.1), respectively. Breastfeeding initiation did not differ with app usage (84.1% in highest quartile versus 78.2% for lowest quartile; p = 0.5). Rates of sustained and exclusive breastfeeding through 6 months were similar between groups. Among both groups, smartphone apps were the most preferred breastfeeding resource at 6 weeks. Low quartile users also preferred alternative online breastfeeding resources: >50% of all users preferred technology-based breastfeeding resources. Conclusions: Increased usage of breastfeeding apps did not improve breastfeeding rates among low-income women. However, technology-based resources were the most preferred breastfeeding resource after hospital discharge, indicating ongoing development of technology-based interventions has potential to increase breastfeeding in this high-needs population. clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03167073).

Entities:  

Keywords:  breastfeeding; exclusive breastfeeding; health equity; postnatal breastfeeding support or education; postpartum care; smartphone applications

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33826418      PMCID: PMC8380791          DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2021.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breastfeed Med        ISSN: 1556-8253            Impact factor:   2.335


  28 in total

1.  Antenatal training to improve breast feeding: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Hanne Kronborg; Rikke Damkjær Maimburg; Michael Væth
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.372

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 729: Importance of Social Determinants of Health and Cultural Awareness in the Delivery of Reproductive Health Care.

Authors:  Veronica Ades; Brian Goddard; Savannah Pearson Ayala; Sonya Chemouni Bach; Stephanie X Wu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Evaluation of a Breastfeeding App in Rural Australia: Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nikita Wheaton; Jacinta Lenehan; Lisa H Amir
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.219

4.  A pilot study of home-based videoconferencing for breastfeeding support.

Authors:  Wilaiporn Rojjanasrirat; Eve-Lynn Nelson; Karen A Wambach
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.219

5.  Diet quality and weight change among overweight and obese postpartum women enrolled in a behavioral intervention program.

Authors:  Gina A Wiltheiss; Cheryl A Lovelady; Deborah G West; Rebecca J N Brouwer; Katrina M Krause; Truls Østbye
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Committee Opinion No. 570: breastfeeding in underserved women: increasing initiation and continuation of breastfeeding.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Breast-feeding rates at an inner-city pediatric practice.

Authors:  Lydia Furman; Bridget C Combs; Ashley D Alexander; Mary Ann O'Riordan
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 1.168

8.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 756: Optimizing Support for Breastfeeding as Part of Obstetric Practice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The cost of not breastfeeding: global results from a new tool.

Authors:  Dylan D Walters; Linh T H Phan; Roger Mathisen
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.344

10.  Randomization in Clinical Trials: Permuted Blocks and Stratification.

Authors:  Kristine Broglio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Updating Clinical Practices to Promote and Protect Human Milk and Breastfeeding in a COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Johannes B van Goudoever; Diane L Spatz; Rebecca Hoban; Dani Dumitriu; Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman; Monika Berns; Liz McKechnie; Riccardo Davanzo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.569

2.  Complementary feeding: Should baby be leading the way?

Authors:  Simon C Langley-Evans
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 2.995

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.