Literature DB >> 33084892

Intrinsic DNA topology as a prioritization metric in genomic fine-mapping studies.

Hannah C Ainsworth1,2, Timothy D Howard2,3, Carl D Langefeld1,2,4.   

Abstract

In genomic fine-mapping studies, some approaches leverage annotation data to prioritize likely functional polymorphisms. However, existing annotation resources can present challenges as many lack information for novel variants and/or may be uninformative for non-coding regions. We propose a novel annotation source, sequence-dependent DNA topology, as a prioritization metric for fine-mapping. DNA topology and function are well-intertwined, and as an intrinsic DNA property, it is readily applicable to any genomic region. Here, we constructed and applied Minor Groove Width (MGW) as a prioritization metric. Using an established MGW-prediction method, we generated a MGW census for 199 038 197 SNPs across the human genome. Summarizing a SNP's change in MGW (ΔMGW) as a Euclidean distance, ΔMGW exhibited a strongly right-skewed distribution, highlighting the infrequency of SNPs that generate dissimilar shape profiles. We hypothesized that phenotypically-associated SNPs can be prioritized by ΔMGW. We tested this hypothesis in 116 regions analyzed by a Massively Parallel Reporter Assay and observed enrichment of large ΔMGW for functional polymorphisms (P = 0.0007). To illustrate application in fine-mapping studies, we applied our MGW-prioritization approach to three non-coding regions associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Together, this study presents the first usage of sequence-dependent DNA topology as a prioritization metric in genomic association studies.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33084892      PMCID: PMC7672465          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  68 in total

1.  DNA Shape versus Sequence Variations in the Protein Binding Process.

Authors:  Chuanying Chen; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges.

Authors:  Mark I McCarthy; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Lon R Cardon; David B Goldstein; Julian Little; John P A Ioannidis; Joel N Hirschhorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Bayesian statistical methods for genetic association studies.

Authors:  Matthew Stephens; David J Balding
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Resolving the discrepancies among nucleic acid conformational analyses.

Authors:  X J Lu; W K Olson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Improved methods for multi-trait fine mapping of pleiotropic risk loci.

Authors:  Gleb Kichaev; Megan Roytman; Ruth Johnson; Eleazar Eskin; Sara Lindström; Peter Kraft; Bogdan Pasaniuc
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  DNA shape, genetic codes, and evolution.

Authors:  Stephen C J Parker; Thomas D Tullius
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 7.  Advances in lupus genetics.

Authors:  Timothy B Niewold
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants.

Authors:  Kyle Kai-How Farh; Alexander Marson; Jiang Zhu; Markus Kleinewietfeld; William J Housley; Samantha Beik; Noam Shoresh; Holly Whitton; Russell J H Ryan; Alexander A Shishkin; Meital Hatan; Marlene J Carrasco-Alfonso; Dita Mayer; C John Luckey; Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Philip L De Jager; Vijay K Kuchroo; Charles B Epstein; Mark J Daly; David A Hafler; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Direct Identification of Hundreds of Expression-Modulating Variants using a Multiplexed Reporter Assay.

Authors:  Ryan Tewhey; Dylan Kotliar; Daniel S Park; Brandon Liu; Sarah Winnicki; Steven K Reilly; Kristian G Andersen; Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Eric S Lander; Stephen F Schaffner; Pardis C Sabeti
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Structural diversity of supercoiled DNA.

Authors:  Rossitza N Irobalieva; Jonathan M Fogg; Daniel J Catanese; Daniel J Catanese; Thana Sutthibutpong; Muyuan Chen; Anna K Barker; Steven J Ludtke; Sarah A Harris; Michael F Schmid; Wah Chiu; Lynn Zechiedrich
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  The flashfm approach for fine-mapping multiple quantitative traits.

Authors:  N Hernández; J Soenksen; P Newcombe; M Sandhu; I Barroso; C Wallace; J L Asimit
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 14.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.