| Literature DB >> 33082184 |
Hagere Yilma1, Erica Sedlander2, Rajiv N Rimal3, Soumik Pattnaik4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to understand if fatigue, the main symptom of anaemia, is a health concern that cues women and their referent groups to obtain iron folic acid supplements.Entities:
Keywords: anaemia; nutrition; public health; qualitative research
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33082184 PMCID: PMC7577027 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Demographic information—perceptual mapping and card sorting
| (n=30) | (n=30) | (n=30) | |
| Age | 34.67 (6.00) | 27.90 (4.76) | 55.87 (7.58) |
| School | |||
| None | 3 (10) | 4 (13.3) | 21 (70.0) |
| Up to primary | 12 (40) | 8 (26.7) | 6 (20.0) |
| Up to secondary | 6 (20) | 7 (23.3) | 2 (6.7) |
| Up to high secondary | 5 (16.6) | 10 (33.4) | 1 (3.3) |
| Up to tertiary | 4 (13.3) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
| Married | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 29 (96.7)† |
| Religion—Hindu | 100 (100) | 100 (100) | 100 (100) |
| Scheduled caste/tribe | 18 (60.0) | 16 (53.3) | 17 (56.6) |
| Other backwards caste | 11 (36.7) | 12 (40.0) | 13 (43.3) |
| Other caste | 1 (3.3) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0) |
| None | 0 (0) | 3 (10) | 0 (0) |
| 1 | 4 (13.3) | 7 (23.3) | 3 (10.0) |
| 2 | 12 (40.0) | 10 (33.3) | 3 (10.0) |
| 3 | 10 (33.3) | 7 (23.3) | 11 (36.7) |
| 4 or more | 4 (13.3) | 3 (10.0) | 13 (43.3) |
| Ever taken IFA | 4 (13.3) | 26 (86.7) | 7 (23.3) |
| Currently taking IFA | 0 (0) | 3 (10.0) | 2 (9.1) |
| Diagnoses of anaemia ever | 1 (3.3) | 16 (53.3) | 4 (13.3) |
| Currently anaemic? | 5 (21.7) | 4 (14.3) | 3 (13.0) |
Under ‘School’, ‘I’ indicates incomplete and ‘C’ indicates complete.
*p < 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
†The one mother-in-law who was not married was a widow.
IFA, iron folic acid; MILs, mothers-in-law; WRA, women of reproductive age.
Figure 1Perceptual map derived for women of reproductive age. Dissimilarity plot across two-dimensions (corresponding to the x and y axes) as displayed by SPSS V.25; plot point labels have been edited for reader clarity.
Importance to health and dislike rating across participant category
| Item | Rating parameter | WRA | Men | MILs | |
| IFA pill | Importance | 1.67 (0.68) | 1.87 (0.35) | 1.73 (0.52) | 2.39 |
| Dislike | 0.53 (0.73) | 0.20 (0.48) | 0.47 (0.73) | 2.15 | |
| Clinic | Importance | 1.80 (0.48) | 1.93 (0.25) | 1.83 (0.38) | 0.98 |
| Dislike | 0.23 (0.50) | 0.20 (0.41) | 0.23 (0.50) | 0.05 | |
| Kiosk | Importance | 1.77 (0.50) | 1.93 (0.25) | 1.87 (0.35) | 1.44 |
| Dislike | 0.27 (0.58) | 0.17 (0.38) | 0.13 (0.43) | 0.64 | |
| Self-help groups | Importance | 1.37 (0.72) | 1.27 (0.74) | 1.57 (0.68) | 1.38 |
| Dislike | 0.30 (0.47)a | 0.73 (0.74)b | 0.50 (0.68)a, b | 3.44* | |
| Traditional healer | Importance | 0.80 (0.76) | 1.23 (0.82) | 1.03 (0.67) | 2.50 |
| Dislike | 1.07 (0.78) | 0.97 (0.85) | 1.07 (0.69) | 0.17 | |
| Physician | Importance | 1.80 (0.55) | 2.00 (0) | 1.90 (0.31) | 2.27 |
| Dislike | 0.20 (0.41) | 0.10 (0.31) | 0.20 (0.48) | 0.61 | |
| Fatigue | Importance | 0.77 (0.73)a | 0.80 (0.61)a | 0.17 (0.53)b | 9.66*** |
| Dislike | 1.47 (0.68)a | 1.23 (0.73)a | 1.87 (0.35)b | 8.29*** | |
| Prenatal care | Importance | 1.43 (0.73) | 1.40 (0.67) | 1.67 (0.61) | 1.40 |
| Dislike | 0.70 (0.89) | 0.57 (0.50) | 0.33 (0.66) | 2.12 | |
| Green veggies | Importance | 1.63 (0.62) | 1.63 (0.49) | 1.80 (0.41) | 1.06 |
| Dislike | 0.37 (0.61) | 0.30 (0.60) | 0.13 (0.35) | 1.52 | |
| Meat | Importance | 1.23 (0.68) | 0.97 (0.76) | 1.37 (0.61) | 2.62 |
| Dislike | 0.77 (0.73) | 0.90 (0.76) | 0.60 (0.62) | 1.36 | |
| Pregnancy | Importance | 1.13 (0.82) | 1.23 (0.63) | 1.57 (0.68) | 3.04 |
| Dislike | 0.80 (0.85)a | 0.80 (0.48)a | 0.30 (0.60)b | 5.74** | |
| Stomach-ache | Importance | 0.63 (0.67)a | 0.87 (0.68)a | 0.30 (0.60)b | 5.76** |
| Dislike | 1.47 (0.68)a | 1.17 (0.65)b | 1.83 (0.46)c | 9.15*** |
The letters a and b denote homogenous subsets yielded from the post-hoc analysis when omnibus significance was detected.
*p < 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
IFA, iron folic acid; MILs, mothers-in-law; WRA, women of reproductive age.
Figure 2Perceptual map derived for men. Dissimilarity plot across two-dimensions (corresponding to the x and y axes) as displayed by SPSS V.25; plot point labels have been edited for reader clarity.
Figure 3Perceptual map derived for mothers-in-law. Dissimilarity plot across two-dimensions (corresponding to the x and y axes) as displayed by SPSS V.25; plot point labels have been edited for reader clarity.