Nicole M Brossier1, Sharanya Thondapu2, Olivia M Cobb2, Sonika Dahiya3, David H Gutmann2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 2. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 3. Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors of childhood, but little is understood about the factors that influence their development. Pediatric low-grade gliomas in particular display unique temporal and spatial localization associated with different genetic mutations (eg, BRAF genomic alterations, mutations in the neurofibromatosis type 1 [NF1] gene) for reasons that remain unclear. NF1 low-grade gliomas typically arise in the optic pathway of young children as optic pathway gliomas (OPGs), likely from a cell of origin that resides within the third ventricular zone (TVZ). However, the factors that contribute to their distinct temporal patterning and penetrance have not been adequately explored. METHODS: TVZ neuroglial progenitor cells (NPCs) were analyzed over the course of mouse brain development. Progenitors isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) were assessed for functional and molecular differences. The impact of different germline Nf1 mutations on TVZ NPC properties was analyzed using genetically engineered mice. RESULTS: We identify 3 individual factors that could each contribute to Nf1 optic glioma temporal patterning and penetrance. First, there are 3 functionally and molecularly distinct populations of mouse TVZ NPCs, one of which ("M" cells) exhibits the highest clonogenic incidence, proliferation, and abundance during embryogenesis. Second, TVZ NPC proliferation dramatically decreases after birth. Third, germline Nf1 mutations differentially increase TVZ NPC proliferation during embryogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: The unique temporal patterning and penetrance of Nf1 optic glioma reflects the combined effects of TVZ NPC population composition, time-dependent changes in progenitor proliferation, and the differential impact of the germline Nf1 mutation on TVZ NPC expansion.
BACKGROUND:Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors of childhood, but little is understood about the factors that influence their development. Pediatric low-grade gliomas in particular display unique temporal and spatial localization associated with different genetic mutations (eg, BRAF genomic alterations, mutations in the neurofibromatosis type 1 [NF1] gene) for reasons that remain unclear. NF1 low-grade gliomas typically arise in the optic pathway of young children as optic pathway gliomas (OPGs), likely from a cell of origin that resides within the third ventricular zone (TVZ). However, the factors that contribute to their distinct temporal patterning and penetrance have not been adequately explored. METHODS:TVZ neuroglial progenitor cells (NPCs) were analyzed over the course of mouse brain development. Progenitors isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) were assessed for functional and molecular differences. The impact of different germline Nf1 mutations on TVZ NPC properties was analyzed using genetically engineered mice. RESULTS: We identify 3 individual factors that could each contribute to Nf1optic glioma temporal patterning and penetrance. First, there are 3 functionally and molecularly distinct populations of mouseTVZ NPCs, one of which ("M" cells) exhibits the highest clonogenic incidence, proliferation, and abundance during embryogenesis. Second, TVZ NPC proliferation dramatically decreases after birth. Third, germline Nf1 mutations differentially increase TVZ NPC proliferation during embryogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: The unique temporal patterning and penetrance of Nf1optic glioma reflects the combined effects of TVZ NPC population composition, time-dependent changes in progenitor proliferation, and the differential impact of the germline Nf1 mutation on TVZ NPC expansion.
Authors: S C Robins; I Stewart; D E McNay; V Taylor; C Giachino; M Goetz; J Ninkovic; N Briancon; E Maratos-Flier; J S Flier; M V Kokoeva; M Placzek Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: David T W Jones; Sylvia Kocialkowski; Lu Liu; Danita M Pearson; L Magnus Bäcklund; Koichi Ichimura; V Peter Collins Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Corina Anastasaki; Michelle L Wegscheid; Kelly Hartigan; Jason B Papke; Nathan D Kopp; Jiayang Chen; Olivia Cobb; Joseph D Dougherty; David H Gutmann Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 7.765
Authors: Joseph D Dougherty; Susan E Maloney; Rachel M Rahn; Claire T Weichselbaum; David H Gutmann Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2021-03-20 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: Till Milde; Fausto J Rodriguez; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Nirav Patil; Charles G Eberhart; David H Gutmann Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 13.029