PURPOSE: Several factors affect how medical oncologists in the Philippines use biomarkers in real-world practice. This study describes patterns of biomarker testing for the management of breast, colorectal, and lung cancers among medical oncologists in the Philippines. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was performed among practicing medical oncologists in the Philippines from November to December 2019. The questionnaire determined the ideal and practical use of biomarkers as perceived by the respondents. Responses were summarized. Associations between biomarker use across select conditions were determined. RESULTS: A total of 127 respondents (38% of medical oncologists in the Philippines) participated in this study. In actual practice, 97% of the respondents requested estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor testing, and 93% requested human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing. For colorectal cancer, the respondents would use KRAS and mismatch repair/microsatellite instability, but 59.84% had never used BRAF. For lung cancer, 97.64% of respondents would test for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), 88.19% would test for PD-L1, 80.31% for anaplastic lymphoma kinase, 58.27% for ROS1, and 33.07% for BRAF. In actual practice, EGFR was the most frequently ordered test (67.72%), while 44.80% of medical oncologists had never used ROS1. The most common reason for testing was adherence to international guidelines (96%). The most commonly cited barrier to biomarker use was patients' financial constraints (94.49%). Overall, the respondents' use of biomarkers was not significantly associated with institutional affiliation, the number of patients they saw monthly, and the availability of biomarker tests in their areas of practice. CONCLUSION: Medical oncologists in the Philippines would use biomarkers in treating breast, colorectal, and lung cancers if these were clinically indicated and if cost were not a factor. Financial difficulty experienced by patients was the most commonly cited barrier to biomarker use.
PURPOSE: Several factors affect how medical oncologists in the Philippines use biomarkers in real-world practice. This study describes patterns of biomarker testing for the management of breast, colorectal, and lung cancers among medical oncologists in the Philippines. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was performed among practicing medical oncologists in the Philippines from November to December 2019. The questionnaire determined the ideal and practical use of biomarkers as perceived by the respondents. Responses were summarized. Associations between biomarker use across select conditions were determined. RESULTS: A total of 127 respondents (38% of medical oncologists in the Philippines) participated in this study. In actual practice, 97% of the respondents requested estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor testing, and 93% requested humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing. For colorectal cancer, the respondents would use KRAS and mismatch repair/microsatellite instability, but 59.84% had never used BRAF. For lung cancer, 97.64% of respondents would test for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), 88.19% would test for PD-L1, 80.31% for anaplastic lymphoma kinase, 58.27% for ROS1, and 33.07% for BRAF. In actual practice, EGFR was the most frequently ordered test (67.72%), while 44.80% of medical oncologists had never used ROS1. The most common reason for testing was adherence to international guidelines (96%). The most commonly cited barrier to biomarker use was patients' financial constraints (94.49%). Overall, the respondents' use of biomarkers was not significantly associated with institutional affiliation, the number of patients they saw monthly, and the availability of biomarker tests in their areas of practice. CONCLUSION: Medical oncologists in the Philippines would use biomarkers in treating breast, colorectal, and lung cancers if these were clinically indicated and if cost were not a factor. Financial difficulty experienced by patients was the most commonly cited barrier to biomarker use.
Authors: Gregory P Kalemkerian; Navneet Narula; Erin B Kennedy; William A Biermann; Jessica Donington; Natasha B Leighl; Madelyn Lew; James Pantelas; Suresh S Ramalingam; Martin Reck; Anjali Saqi; Michael Simoff; Navneet Singh; Baskaran Sundaram Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paul F Engstrom; Juan Pablo Arnoletti; Al B Benson; Yi-Jen Chen; Michael A Choti; Harry S Cooper; Anne Covey; Raza A Dilawari; Dayna S Early; Peter C Enzinger; Marwan G Fakih; James Fleshman; Charles Fuchs; Jean L Grem; Krystyna Kiel; James A Knol; Lucille A Leong; Edward Lin; Mary F Mulcahy; Sujata Rao; David P Ryan; Leonard Saltz; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos Sofocleous; James Thomas; Alan P Venook; Christopher Willett Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Y-L Wu; D Planchard; S Lu; H Sun; N Yamamoto; D-W Kim; D S W Tan; J C-H Yang; M Azrif; T Mitsudomi; K Park; R A Soo; J W C Chang; A Alip; S Peters; J-Y Douillard Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Matthias Holdhoff; Xiaobu Ye; Jaishri O Blakeley; Lindsay Blair; Peter C Burger; Stuart A Grossman; Luis A Diaz Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Fortunato Ciardiello; Richard Adams; Josep Tabernero; Thomas Seufferlein; Julien Taieb; Vladimir Moiseyenko; Brigette Ma; Gustavo Lopez; Johan F Vansteenkiste; Regina Esser; Sabine Tejpar Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-02-17
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth Hale Hammond; Kimberly H Allison; Brittany E Harvey; Pamela B Mangu; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Ian O Ellis; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Lisa M McShane; Mitchell Dowsett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ceara Tess Cunningham; Hude Quan; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Tom Noseworthy; Cynthia A Beck; Elijah Dixon; Susan Samuel; William A Ghali; Lindsay L Sykes; Nathalie Jetté Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 4.615