Literature DB >> 33079242

"Topographic Shift": a new digital approach to evaluating topographic changes of the female breast.

Luisa Lotter1, Vanessa Brébant1, Andreas Eigenberger1,2, Robin Hartmann1, Karolina Mueller3, Magnus Baringer1, Lukas Prantl1, Daniel Schiltz4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess precise topographic changes of the breast, objective documentation and evaluation of pre- and postoperative results are crucial. New technologies for mapping the body using digital, three-dimensional surface measurements have offered novel ways to numerically assess the female breast. Due to the lack of clear demarcation points of the breast contour, the selection of landmarks on the breast is highly dependent on the examiner, and, therefore, is prone to error when conducting before-after comparisons of the same breast. This study describes an alternative to volumetric measurements, focusing on topographic changes of the female breast, based on three-dimensional scans.
METHOD: The study was designed as an interventional prospective study of 10 female volunteers who had planned on having aesthetic breast augmentation with anatomical, textured implants. Three dimensional scans of the breasts were performed intraoperatively, first without and then with breast implants. The topographic change was determined as the mean distance between two three-dimensional layers before and after augmentation. This mean distance is defined as the Topographic Shift.
RESULTS: The mean implant volume was 283 cc (SD = 68.6 cc, range = 210-395 cc). The mean Topographic Shift was 7.4 mm (SD = 1.9 mm, range = 4.8-10.7 mm). The mean Topographic Shifts per quadrant were: I: 8.0 mm (SD = 3.3 mm); II: 9.2 mm (SD = 3.1 mm); III: 6.9 mm (SD = 3.5 mm); IV: 1.9 mm (SD = 4.3 mm).
CONCLUSION: The Topographic Shift, describing the mean distance between two three-dimensional layers (for example before and after a volume changing therapy), is a new approach that can be used for assessing topographic changes of a body area. It was found that anatomical, textured breast implants cause a topographic change, particularly on the upper breast, in quadrant II, the décolleté.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D measurement; 3D scan; 3D volumetry; Breast augmentation; Breast implant; Topographic shift

Year:  2020        PMID: 33079242     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05837-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  24 in total

1.  Three-dimensional photography.

Authors:  R A Jacobs
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application.

Authors:  M Westreich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months.

Authors:  Maximilian Eder; Fee v Waldenfels; Michael Sichtermann; Tibor Schuster; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Hans-Günther Machens; Edgar Biemer; Laszlo Kovacs
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  [Landmark-based statistical procrustes analysis in the examination of breast shape and symmetry].

Authors:  H Henseler; B Khambay; X Ju; A Ayoub; A K Ray
Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.018

5.  Round versus Anatomical Implants in Primary Cosmetic Breast Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fengrui Cheng; Ying Cen; Chuanqi Liu; Ruolin Liu; Cheng Pan; Shuiping Dai
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application.

Authors:  T P Brown; C Ringrose; R E Hyland; A A Cole; T M Brotherston
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1999-07

7.  Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques.

Authors:  Laszlo Kovacs; Maximilian Eder; Regina Hollweck; Alexander Zimmermann; Markus Settles; Armin Schneider; Matthias Endlich; Andreas Mueller; Katja Schwenzer-Zimmerer; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Edgar Biemer
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging.

Authors:  Maximilian Eder; Fee V Waldenfels; Alexandra Swobodnik; Markus Klöppel; Ann-Kathrin Pape; Tibor Schuster; Stefan Raith; Elena Kitzler; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Hans-Günther Machens; Laszlo Kovacs
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Comparative double blind clinical study on round versus shaped cohesive gel implants.

Authors:  Tal Friedman; Nadav Davidovitch; Michael Scheflan
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  [Quantitative volumetric analysis of the lower extremity: validation against established tape measurement and water displacement].

Authors:  Konstantin Christoph Koban; Virginia Titze; Lucas Etzel; Konstantin Frank; Thilo Schenck; Riccardo Giunta
Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 1.018

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intraoperative 3D Comparison of Round and Anatomical Breast Implants: Dispelling a Myth.

Authors:  Luisa Lotter; Isabel Zucal; Vanessa Brébant; Norbert Heine; Robin Hartmann; Karolina Mueller; Lukas Prantl; Daniel Schiltz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.