Literature DB >> 21849246

Objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging.

Maximilian Eder1, Fee V Waldenfels, Alexandra Swobodnik, Markus Klöppel, Ann-Kathrin Pape, Tibor Schuster, Stefan Raith, Elena Kitzler, Nikolaos A Papadopulos, Hans-Günther Machens, Laszlo Kovacs.   

Abstract

This study develops an objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging (Konica-Minolta V910(®) scanner) by superimposing the mirrored left breast over the right and objectively determining the mean 3-D contour difference between the 2 breast surfaces. 3 observers analyzed the evaluation protocol precision using 2 dummy models (n = 60), 10 test subjects (n = 300), clinically tested it on 30 patients (n = 900) and compared it to established 2-D measurements on 23 breast reconstructive patients using the BCCT.core software (n = 690). Mean 3-D evaluation precision, expressed as the coefficient of variation (VC), was 3.54 ± 0.18 for all human subjects without significant intra- and inter-observer differences (p > 0.05). The 3-D breast symmetry evaluation is observer independent, significantly more precise (p < 0.001) than the BCCT.core software (VC = 6.92 ± 0.88) and may play a part in an objective surgical outcome analysis after incorporation into clinical practice.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21849246     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  13 in total

1.  Three-dimensional prediction of free-flap volume in autologous breast reconstruction by CT angiography imaging.

Authors:  Maximilian Eder; Stefan Raith; Jalil Jalali; Daniel Müller; Yves Harder; Martin Dobritz; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Hans-Günther Machens; Laszlo Kovacs
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Cosmetic evaluation methods adapted to asian patients after breast-conserving surgery and examination of the necessarily elements for cosmetic evaluation.

Authors:  Yuki Nohara; Noriko Hanamura; Hisamitsu Zaha; Hiroko Kimura; Yumi Kashikura; Takashi Nakamura; Aya Noro; Nao Imai; Mai Shibusawa; Tomoko Ogawa
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.588

3.  Quantification of Regional Breast Density in Four Quadrants Using 3D MRI-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Peter T Fwu; Jeon-Hor Chen; Yifan Li; Siwa Chan; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  A prospective study of breast dynamic morphological changes after dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty with 3D scanning technique.

Authors:  Kai Ji; Jie Luan; Chunjun Liu; Dali Mu; Lanhua Mu; Minqiang Xin; Jingjing Sun; Shilu Yin; Lin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cosmetic Outcome Assessment following Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Comparison between BCCT.core Software and Panel Evaluation.

Authors:  Max Hendrik Haloua; Nicole Marianna Alexandra Krekel; Gerrit Johannes Albertus Jacobs; Barbara Zonderhuis; Mark-Bram Bouman; Marlon Eugène Buncamper; Franciscus Bernardus Niessen; Henri Adolf Hubert Winters; Caroline Terwee; Sybren Meijer; Monique Petrousjka van den Tol
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-09-22

6.  Objective breast symmetry analysis with the breast analyzing tool (BAT): improved tool for clinical trials.

Authors:  Wilfried Krois; Alexander Ken Romar; Thomas Wild; Peter Dubsky; Ruth Exner; Peter Panhofer; Raimund Jakesz; Michael Gnant; Florian Fitzal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  New software and breast boundary landmarks to calculate breast volumes from 3D surface images.

Authors:  T S Wesselius; R D Vreeken; A C Verhulst; T Xi; T J J Maal; D J O Ulrich
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-07-06

8.  "Topographic Shift": a new digital approach to evaluating topographic changes of the female breast.

Authors:  Luisa Lotter; Vanessa Brébant; Andreas Eigenberger; Robin Hartmann; Karolina Mueller; Magnus Baringer; Lukas Prantl; Daniel Schiltz
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Intraoperative 3D Comparison of Round and Anatomical Breast Implants: Dispelling a Myth.

Authors:  Luisa Lotter; Isabel Zucal; Vanessa Brébant; Norbert Heine; Robin Hartmann; Karolina Mueller; Lukas Prantl; Daniel Schiltz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Applications and limitations of using patient-specific 3D printed molds in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Stefan Hummelink; Arico C Verhulst; Thomas J J Maal; Dietmar J O Ulrich
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.