Literature DB >> 33079195

Trends in the Use of Buprenorphine in US Emergency Departments, 2002-2017.

Taeho Greg Rhee1,2, Gail D'Onofrio3,4,5, David A Fiellin3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33079195      PMCID: PMC7576404          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder, and its use has increased over time in outpatient settings[1] and among commercially insured adults in the United States.[2] Although the American College of Emergency Physicians and other professional organizations have advocated for buprenorphine treatment initiation in emergency department (ED) settings,[3] little is known about how often this practice occurs in EDs nationwide. We examined the trends of buprenorphine use in EDs in the United States from 2002 (when it was approved) through 2017.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used 2002-2017 data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which provides nationally representative samples of ED visits.[4] We examined ED visits by patients aged 18 years or older. From our examination of these visits, we estimated trends of visits during which buprenorphine was dispensed using generic names (ie, buprenorphine or buprenorphine-naloxone). We combined data into 2-year intervals to improve the stability of our estimates.[4] We quantified the number of visits during which these medications were used per 100 000 ED visits. This study was deemed to be exempt from human subjects review by the Yale School of Medicine’s Institutional Review Board because we used publicly available, deidentified data. Study procedures followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies. We compared the proportions of ED visits during which buprenorphine was dispensed between 2002-2003 and 2016-2017 using an adjusted Wald χ2 test. To test linear trends over time, we transformed the survey year range from 0 (for 2002-2003) to 1 (for 2016-2017). Odds ratios associated with this transformed variable represent change in the odds of proportion of medication use during ED visits across the entire study period. We further conducted subgroup analyses by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and region. Stata, version 15.1 MP/6-Core (Stata Corp) was used for all analyses, and we used the svy commands in that statistical software to account for multiple years and the complex survey sampling design of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, including unequal probability of selection, clustering, and stratification.[4] Two-sided P < .05 was used to test statistical significance.

Results

Between 2002 and 2017, there were 441 475 ED visits during which buprenorphine was dispensed. Among the patients who received buprenorphine, the mean (SD) age was 39.1 (14.8) years, 49.1% were male, 66.3% were non-Hispanic White, 31.0% were non-Hispanic Black, and 92.7% were from urban areas. The use of buprenorphine increased from 12.3 per 100 000 ED visits in 2002-2003 to 42.8 per 100 000 ED visits in 2016-2017 (odds ratio for linear trend, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.04-10.50) (Figure). From 2002-2003 to 2016-2017, the use of buprenorphine increased linearly among individuals aged 19 to 44 years (from 10.4 to 38.4 per 100 000 ED visits; P = .02). The use of buprenorphine also increased over time in the Northeast (from 0.0 to 8.2 per 100 000 ED visits; P = .01) and metropolitan areas (from 12.2 to 42.8 per 100 000 ED visits; P = .03) (Table).
Figure.

Trends in the Use of Buprenorphine in Emergency Departments (EDs) per 100 000 Visits in the United States, 2002-2017

Data are from National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Estimates are adjusted to annual ED visits. Buprenorphine use increased significantly from 2002-2003 to 2016-2017 (odds ratio for linear trend, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.04-10.50; P = .04).

Table.

Trends in the Use of Buprenorphine in EDs by Demographic Factor in the United States, 2002-2017

Demographic factorPrevalence of buprenorphine use, No. per 100 000 ED visits2002-2003 vs 2016-2017P value for linear trend
2002-20032004-20052006-20072008-20092010-20112012-20132014-20152016-2017F statisticP value
Total ED visits224 057 757225 539 223235 993 594259 833 549266 139 777261 222 653278 363 641284 568 568
Buprenorphine use
Overall visits12.313.312.125.222.39.430.242.85.37.02.04
Opioid-related visits1.90.00.04.00.00.82.21.51.65.20.32
Age, y
≤180.01.90.00.01.00.00.00.0NCbNCb.21
19-4410.46.07.57.516.79.420.438.45.31.02.02
45-641.32.44.511.53.60.09.84.41.59.21.55
≥650.63.10.06.21.00.00.00.00.11.74.03
Sex
Male6.44.55.813.611.55.916.118.51.80.18.12
Female5.98.86.311.710.83.614.124.33.43.06.17
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White9.09.74.914.619.29.424.520.11.46.23.06
Other3.33.67.210.63.10.05.822.73.98.046.24
Region
Northeast0.00.00.95.88.05.33.88.2NCbNCb.01
Midwest0.11.96.26.04.42.53.01.94.09.04.94
South12.211.44.913.57.70.021.620.40.75.39.31
West0.00.00.00.02.11.61.812.3NCbNCb.08
Metropolitan statistical area
Yes12.210.312.118.221.42.529.142.85.39.02.03
No0.13.10.07.10.90.01.10.02.46.12.22

Abbreviations: EDs, emergency departments; NC, not calculable.

Data are from National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Estimates are adjusted to annual ED visits.

Insufficient sample sizes to perform a Wald χ2 test for comparison.

Trends in the Use of Buprenorphine in Emergency Departments (EDs) per 100 000 Visits in the United States, 2002-2017

Data are from National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Estimates are adjusted to annual ED visits. Buprenorphine use increased significantly from 2002-2003 to 2016-2017 (odds ratio for linear trend, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.04-10.50; P = .04). Abbreviations: EDs, emergency departments; NC, not calculable. Data are from National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Estimates are adjusted to annual ED visits. Insufficient sample sizes to perform a Wald χ2 test for comparison.

Discussion

Buprenorphine use increased in EDs between 2002 and 2017, the years for which the most recent data are currently available. The increase in overall buprenorphine use could be attributed to an increase in opioid-related ED visits.[5] Limitations include the assumption that all buprenorphine was provided for opioid use disorder and the lack of information on dosing, route of administration, formulation, or prescriptions written for ongoing treatment after ED discharge. It appears that the sampling strategy or data collection method in 2012-2013 was different from that used in other years because less buprenorphine use was captured. Despite the limitations, the present study found increased use of buprenorphine in ED settings, a promising strategy for narrowing the treatment gap. Potential barriers to ED adoption of buprenorphine treatment initiation for untreated opioid use disorder have been identified,[6] and research on strategies to address these should be prioritized.
  4 in total

1.  Buprenorphine prescribing for opioid use disorder in medical practices: can office-based out-patient care address the opiate crisis in the United States?

Authors:  Taeho Greg Rhee; Robert A Rosenheck
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gail D'Onofrio; Patrick G O'Connor; Michael V Pantalon; Marek C Chawarski; Susan H Busch; Patricia H Owens; Steven L Bernstein; David A Fiellin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Trends in Buprenorphine Treatment in the United States, 2009-2018.

Authors:  Mark Olfson; Victoria Shu Zhang; Michael Schoenbaum; Marissa King
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Barriers and Facilitators to Clinician Readiness to Provide Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine.

Authors:  Kathryn F Hawk; Gail D'Onofrio; Marek C Chawarski; Patrick G O'Connor; Ethan Cowan; Michael S Lyons; Lynne Richardson; Richard E Rothman; Lauren K Whiteside; Patricia H Owens; Shara H Martel; Edouard Coupet; Michael Pantalon; Leslie Curry; David A Fiellin; E Jennifer Edelman
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-05-01
  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Peer providers and linkage with buprenorphine care after hospitalization: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Helen E Jack; Eric D Denisiuk; Brett A Collins; Dan Stephens; Kendra L Blalock; Jared W Klein; Elenore P Bhatraju; Joseph O Merrill; Kevin A Hallgren; Judith I Tsui
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  The Impact of Pediatric Opioid-Related Visits on U.S. Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer; Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas; Irma T Ugalde; Christine Bakos-Block; Angela L Stotts; Lisa Cleveland; Steven Shoptaw; James R Langabeer
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07

3.  Attitudes on Methadone Utilization in the Emergency Department: A Physician Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Jessica Heil; Valerie S Ganetsky; Matthew S Salzman; Krystal Hunter; Kaitlan E Baston; Gerard Carroll; Eric Ketcham; Rachel Haroz
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Trends and Disparities in Access to Buprenorphine Treatment Following an Opioid-Related Emergency Department Visit Among an Insured Cohort, 2014-2020.

Authors:  Maria A Stevens; Jennifer Tsai; Samuel T Savitz; Bidisha Nath; Edward R Melnick; Gail D'Onofrio; Molly Moore Jeffery
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

5.  The design and conduct of a randomized clinical trial comparing emergency department initiation of sublingual versus a 7-day extended-release injection formulation of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: Project ED Innovation.

Authors:  Gail D'Onofrio; Kathryn F Hawk; Andrew A Herring; Jeanmarie Perrone; Ethan Cowan; Ryan P McCormack; James Dziura; R Andrew Taylor; Edouard Coupet; E Jennifer Edelman; Michael V Pantalon; Patricia H Owens; Shara H Martel; Patrick G O'Connor; Paul Van Veldhuisen; Nicholas DeVogel; Kristen Huntley; Sean M Murphy; Michelle R Lofwall; Sharon L Walsh; David A Fiellin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.261

6.  Commentary on Hill et al.: Breaking down barriers-increasing access to lifesaving opioid use disorder medications to save lives.

Authors:  Michael S Toce; Scott E Hadland
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 7.256

7.  Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine protocols: A national evaluation.

Authors:  Clara Z Guo; Gail D'Onofrio; David A Fiellin; E Jennifer Edelman; Kathryn Hawk; Andrew Herring; Ryan McCormack; Jeanmarie Perrone; Ethan Cowan
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.