Paul Pirtea1, Dominique De Ziegler2, Xin Tao3, Li Sun3, Yiping Zhan3, Jean Marc Ayoubi2, Emre Seli4, Jason M Franasiak5, Richard T Scott5. 1. IVIRMA New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey; Hospital Foch, Paris, France. Electronic address: paulpirtea@gmail.com. 2. Hospital Foch, Paris, France. 3. Foundation for Embryonic Competence, Basking Ridge, New Jersey. 4. IVIRMA New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 5. IVIRMA New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the true prevalence of recurrent implantation failure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A private assisted reproductive technology center. PATIENT(S): Women (n = 4,429) with anatomically normal uterus who underwent up to three consecutive frozen euploid single embryo transfers (FE-SETs) were included in the study. Cycles with donor eggs or gestational carriers were excluded. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cumulative outcomes from these cycles were analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to assess the differences of outcomes between first, second, and third FE-SET and a Kaplan-Meier curve as used to analyze cumulative implantation rate. RESULT(S): The mean age of the patients included in the study was of 35.4 years. The sustained implantation rates of the first, second, and third FE-SET were 69.9%, 59.8%, and 60.3% per transfer, respectively. The cumulative sustained implantation rate after up to three consecutive FE-SET was 95.2%. The live birth rates after the first, second, and third FE-SET were 64.8%, 54.4%, and 54.1% per transfer, respectively. The cumulative live birth rate after up to three consecutive FE-SET was 92.6%. The miscarriage rate after observing a positive heartbeat was not different between the first (7.2%), second (8.8%), and third (12.7%) FE-SET. CONCLUSION(S): Our findings suggest that true recurrent implantation failure is rare. For those patients with the ability to make euploid blastocysts, <5% would fail to achieve a clinical pregnancy with three embryos transferred. It remains to be further investigated whether this threshold identifies a truly recalcitrant group or simply a statistical certainty based on random variation.
OBJECTIVE: To study the true prevalence of recurrent implantation failure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A private assisted reproductive technology center. PATIENT(S): Women (n = 4,429) with anatomically normal uterus who underwent up to three consecutive frozen euploid single embryo transfers (FE-SETs) were included in the study. Cycles with donor eggs or gestational carriers were excluded. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cumulative outcomes from these cycles were analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to assess the differences of outcomes between first, second, and third FE-SET and a Kaplan-Meier curve as used to analyze cumulative implantation rate. RESULT(S): The mean age of the patients included in the study was of 35.4 years. The sustained implantation rates of the first, second, and third FE-SET were 69.9%, 59.8%, and 60.3% per transfer, respectively. The cumulative sustained implantation rate after up to three consecutive FE-SET was 95.2%. The live birth rates after the first, second, and third FE-SET were 64.8%, 54.4%, and 54.1% per transfer, respectively. The cumulative live birth rate after up to three consecutive FE-SET was 92.6%. The miscarriage rate after observing a positive heartbeat was not different between the first (7.2%), second (8.8%), and third (12.7%) FE-SET. CONCLUSION(S): Our findings suggest that true recurrent implantation failure is rare. For those patients with the ability to make euploid blastocysts, <5% would fail to achieve a clinical pregnancy with three embryos transferred. It remains to be further investigated whether this threshold identifies a truly recalcitrant group or simply a statistical certainty based on random variation.