| Literature DB >> 33076892 |
Mazni Abu Zarin1,2, Joo Shun Tan3, Paramasivam Murugan1, Rosma Ahmad1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The banana or scientifically referred to as Musa sp., is one of the most popular fruits all over the world. Almost all parts of a banana tree, including the fruits, stem juice, and flowers are commonly used as traditional medicine for treating diarrhoea (unripe), menorrhagia, diabetes, dysentery, and antiulcerogenic, hypoglycemic, antilithic, hypolipidemic conditions, plus antioxidant actions, inflammation, pains and even snakebites. The study carried out was to evaluate in vitro anti-urolithiatic activity from different types of Musa pseudo-stems.Entities:
Keywords: Aggregation; Anti-urolithiathic; Calcium oxalate; Microscopic; Musa pseudo-stem; Nucleation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33076892 PMCID: PMC7574319 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-03113-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Physical characteristics of banana pseudo-stem extracts after freeze dried. Musa acuminate x balbisianaColla cv. ‘Awak Manis’ (A), M. paradisiaca cv. Nangka, ‘Pisang Nangka’ (B), Musa acuminate Colla cv. ‘Sucrier’ (C) and Musa acuminate x balbisianaColla cv. ‘AwakLegor’ (D)
| Label | Extracts | Characteristics | Yield (%, w/w) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | Juice | Dark brown, solid | 0.07 ± 0.02 |
| 1B | Juice | Dark brown, sticky | 0.05 ± 0.05 |
| 1C | Juice | Dark brown, sticky | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
| 1D | Juice | Yellowish, sticky | 0.11 ± 0.06 |
| 2A | Pseudo-stem | Brown, sticky | 0.86 ± 0.12 |
| 2B | Pseudo-stem | White, fluffy | 1.64 ± 0.27 |
| 2C | Pseudo-stem | Brown, sticky | 3.11 ± 0.15 |
| 2D | Pseudo-stem | Brown, sticky | 5.01 ± 0.11 |
| 3A | Bagasse | Light yellow, fluffy | 0.95 ± 0.08 |
| 3B | Bagasse | Brown, sticky | 0.57 ± 0.04 |
| 3C | Bagasse | Brown, sticky | 0.80 ± 0.11 |
| 3D | Bagasse | Brown, sticky | 0.96 ± 0.13 |
Fig. 1Nucleation assay of 12 extracts and positive control (cystone) incubated at 37 °C for 360 min. a Juice (b) Pseudo-stem (c) Bagasse. The interaction term between types of extracts and incubation time was significant (p < 0.0001), repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance, adjusted for multiple pairwise comparisons with the Tukey’s multiple comparison test, was applied to these data to assess differences at each time interval. Points at the same time interval and bars with aesrick (*) are significantly different from control (Cystone), p < 0.05
Two-way ANOVA analysis of two main factors (incubation time and types of extracts) related to Caox crystal inhibition activity in nucleation assay
| Source | Dependent variable | SS | MS | F (DFn, DFd) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction | Inhibition activity | 5705 | 48 | 118.9 | F (48, 130) = 38.95 | |
| Incubation time | Inhibition activity | 12147 | 4 | 3037 | F (4, 130) = 995.3 | |
| Types of extracts | Inhibition activity | 9038 | 12 | 753.2 | F (12, 130) = 246.8 |
Fig. 2Aggregation assay of 12 extracts and positive control (cystone) incubated at 37 °C for 360 min. a Juice (b) Pseudo-stem (c) Bagasse. The interaction term between types of extracts and incubation time was significant (p < 0.0001), repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance, adjusted for multiple pairwise comparisons with the Tukey’s multiple comparison test, was applied to these data to assess differences at each time interval. Points at the same time interval and bars with aesrick (*) are significantly different from control (Cystone), p < 0.05
Two-way ANOVA analysis of two main factors (incubation time and types of extracts) related to Caox crystal inhibition activity in aggregation assay
| Source | Dependent variable | SS | MS | F (DFn, DFd) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction | Inhibition activity | 4924 | 48 | 102.6 | F (48, 130) = 20.37 | |
| Incubation time | Inhibition activity | 17809 | 4 | 4452 | F (4, 130) = 884.3 | |
| Types of extracts | Inhibition activity | 22087 | 12 | 1841 | F (12, 130) = 365.6 |
Fig. 3Light microscopic image of nucleation inhibition activity (10X magnification) (a) negative control (no treatment) (b) positive control (cystone) (2 mg/mL) (c) 2D extract (2 mg/mL)
Fig. 4Light microscopic image of aggregation inhibition activity (10x magnification). a negative control (no treatment) (b) positive control (cystone) (2 mg/mL) (c) 3D extract (2 mg/mL)
Phytochemicals test for 2D pseudo-stem and 3D bagasse extracts
| Sample/Test | 2D | 3D |
|---|---|---|
| Saponin | ||
| - Foam test | + | + |
| Tannins | ||
| - Gelatin test | + | + |
| - Ferric chloride test | ||
| Flavonoids | ||
| - Shinoda’s test | + | – |
| - Alkaline reagent test | + | + |
| - Zn/HCl or Mg/HCl reduction | – | – |
| Steroid | + | + |
| Carbohydrate | ||
| - Molisch’s test | + | + |
| - Barfoed’s test | + | + |
| Triterpenoids | + | + |
| Protein | ||
| - Biuret test | – | – |
| Alkaloid | ||
| - Dragendorff’s test | – | – |
+ Positive result, − negative result