| Literature DB >> 29034196 |
Anil T Pawar1,2, Niraj S Vyawahare3.
Abstract
The methanolic whole plant extract of Biophytum sensitivum (gǎnyìng cǎo) has been found to possess antiurolithiatic effect. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the antiurolithiatic effect of some fractions of methanolic whole plant extract of B. sensitivum (MBS) in rats as a step toward activity-directed isolation of antiurolithiatic component. The MBS was successively extracted with dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, ethanol and water to obtain fractions. Sodium oxalate (70 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered to rats for seven days to develop calcium oxalate urolithiasis. These rats were treated with two doses (20 and 40 mg/kg, p.o.) of the fractions, 1 h before sodium oxalate injections. Antiurolithiatic activity was assessed by estimating biochemical changes in urine, serum and kidney homogenate along with histological changes in kidney tissue. Sodium oxalate administration caused biochemical alterations in urine which was found to be prevented significantly by the ethyl acetate fraction. Supplementation with ethyl acetate fraction prevented the elevation of serum creatinine, uric acid and blood urea nitrogen levels. The elevated calcium, oxalate and phosphate levels in the kidney tissue homogenate of lithiatic rats were significantly reduced by the treatment with ethyl acetate fraction. The ethyl acetate fraction also caused significant decrease in lipid peroxidation activity, accumulation of calcium oxalate deposits and histological changes in the kidney tissue. The results showed that the antiurolithiatic component of the methanolic whole plant extract of the plant is contained in the ethyl acetate fraction. The effect is attributed to its diuretic, antioxidant, nephroprotective properties and effect on lowering the concentration of urinary stone-forming constituents.Entities:
Keywords: Biophytum sensitivum; Ethyl acetate fraction; Oxalidaceae; Sodium oxalate; Urolithiasis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29034196 PMCID: PMC5634726 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.12.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Effect of MBS-fractions on urinary parameters in urolithiasis-induced rats.
| Days | Vehicle control | Lithiatic control | DCM-MBS (20 mg/kg) | DCM-MBS (40 mg/kg) | EA-MBS (20 mg/kg) | EA-MBS (40 mg/kg) | E-MBS (20 mg/kg) | E-MBS (40 mg/kg) | AQ-MBS (20 mg/kg) | AQ-MBS (40 mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6.43 ± 0.46 | 6.28 ± 0.57 | 5.95 ± 0.58 | 6.08 ± 0.61 | 6.00 ± 0.65 | 6.15 ± 0.58 | 6.23 ± 0.58 | 6.10 ± 0.58 | 6.33 ± 0.48 | 6.45 ± 0.53 |
| 7 | 6.20 ± 0.52 | 6.10 ± 0.50 | 10.07 ± 1.37 | 14.20 ± 2.36∗ | 10.53 ± 0.83 | 13.78 ± 2.16∗ | 10.20 ± 1.25 | 17.73 ± 2.85∗∗∗ | 12.47 ± 1.32 | 21.92 ± 2.02∗∗∗ |
| 0 | 4.55 ± 0.28 | 4.48 ± 0.26 | 4.47 ± 0.31 | 4.60 ± 0.26 | 4.59 ± 0.23 | 4.54 ± 0.31 | 4.52 ± 0.27 | 4.43 ± 0.28 | 4.57 ± 0.25 | 4.48 ± 0.27 |
| 7 | 4.46 ± 0.25 | 6.34 ± 0.32††† | 6.30 ± 0.36 | 6.20 ± 0.29 | 4.94 ± 0.34∗ | 4.60 ± 0.27∗∗ | 5.41 ± 0.30 | 4.90 ± 0.33∗ | 5.96 ± 0.30 | 5.55 ± 0.36 |
| 0 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.52 ± 0.02 |
| 7 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.02††† | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.02∗ | 0.50 ± 0.02∗∗∗ | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.43 ± 0.02∗∗ | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.41 ± 0.02∗ |
| 0 | 5.78 ± 0.11 | 5.43 ± 0.12 | 5.48 ± 0.11 | 5.51 ± 0.15 | 5.58 ± 0.14 | 5.45 ± 0.13 | 5.56 ± 0.13 | 5.56 ± 0.13 | 5.69 ± 0.16 | 5.74 ± 0.13 |
| 7 | 5.45 ± 0.11 | 6.88 ± 0.22††† | 6.79 ± 0.17 | 6.64 ± 0.22 | 5.91 ± 0.13∗∗ | 5.61 ± 0.15∗∗∗ | 6.11 ± 0.26∗ | 5.89 ± 0.19∗∗ | 6.37 ± 0.17 | 6.04 ± 0.12∗ |
| 0 | 4.01 ± 0.20 | 3.90 ± 0.34 | 3.67 ± 0.52 | 3.71 ± 0.54 | 3.84 ± 0.50 | 4.00 ± 0.39 | 3.84 ± 0.41 | 4.04 ± 0.36 | 3.90 ± 0.25 | 3.98 ± 0.30 |
| 7 | 3.67 ± 0.43 | 6.06 ± 0.35†† | 6.08 ± 0.26 | 5.38 ± 0.59 | 3.93 ± 0.15∗∗∗ | 3.41 ± 0.22∗∗∗ | 4.72 ± 0.38∗ | 3.80 ± 0.24∗∗∗ | 4.78 ± 0.33 | 4.08 ± 0.28∗∗∗ |
| 0 | 1.41 ± 0.06 | 1.43 ± 0.05 | 1.40 ± 0.06 | 1.39 ± 0.06 | 1.36 ± 0.07 | 1.38 ± 0.06 | 1.36 ± 0.05 | 1.40 ± 0.06 | 1.38 ± 0.06 | 1.41 ± 0.05 |
| 7 | 1.38 ± 0.05 | 1.75 ± 0.07†† | 1.78 ± 0.08 | 1.74 ± 0.07 | 1.49 ± 0.06 | 1.40 ± 0.07∗∗ | 1.57 ± 0.05 | 1.48 ± 0.06∗ | 1.71 ± 0.06 | 1.55 ± 0.06 |
| 0 | 2.47 ± 0.08 | 2.51 ± 0.07 | 2.46 ± 0.06 | 2.44 ± 0.06 | 2.39 ± 0.07 | 2.42 ± 0.07 | 2.46 ± 0.08 | 2.44 ± 0.07 | 2.45 ± 0.07 | 2.51 ± 0.08 |
| 7 | 2.44 ± 0.11 | 1.82 ± 0.08††† | 1.80 ± 0.07 | 1.84 ± 0.07 | 2.23 ± 0.07∗∗ | 2.35 ± 0.06∗∗∗ | 2.11 ± 0.06∗ | 2.25 ± 0.10∗∗∗ | 1.89 ± 0.07 | 2.09 ± 0.07 |
| 0 | 5.24 ± 0.23 | 5.32 ± 0.24 | 5.26 ± 0.21 | 5.35 ± 0.28 | 5.26 ± 0.13 | 5.53 ± 0.26 | 5.47 ± 0.24 | 5.30 ± 0.19 | 5.16 ± 0.25 | 5.28 ± 0.22 |
| 7 | 5.35 ± 0.29 | 4.30 ± 0.21† | 4.50 ± 0.21 | 4.48 ± 0.17 | 5.01 ± 0.31 | 5.31 ± 0.22∗ | 4.51 ± 0.19 | 5.45 ± 0.24∗∗ | 4.74 ± 0.23 | 5.21 ± 0.29 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6, †p < 0.05; ††p < 0.01; †††p < 0.001 vs. vehicle control, ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 vs. lithiatic control. Values of lithiatic control group were compared with vehicle control and those of drug-treated groups with lithiatic control. SEM = Standard error of mean.
Effect of MBS-fractions on serum parameters in urolithiasis induced rats.
| Days | Vehicle control | Lithiatic control | DCM-MBS (20 mg/kg) | DCM-MBS (40 mg/kg) | EA-MBS (20 mg/kg) | EA-MBS (40 mg/kg) | E-MBS (20 mg/kg) | E-MBS (40 mg/kg) | AQ-MBS (20 mg/kg) | AQ-MBS (40 mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.63 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.04 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 0.59± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.04 |
| 7 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.84 ± 0.05††† | 0.80 ± 0.06 | 0.82 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.04∗ | 0.60 ± 0.03∗∗ | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.03∗ | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.68 ± 0.04 |
| 0 | 1.35 ± 0.04 | 1.39 ± 0.03 | 1.36 ± 0.04 | 1.38 ± 0.04 | 1.41 ± 0.03 | 1.42 ± 0.03 | 1.39 ± 0.03 | 1.36 ± 0.03 | 1.38 ± 0.03 | 1.33 ± 0.02 |
| 7 | 1.33 ± 0.04 | 1.75 ± 0.05††† | 1.80 ± 0.06 | 1.85 ± 0.04 | 1.48 ± 0.05∗∗ | 1.40 ± 0.06∗∗∗ | 1.63 ± 0.06 | 1.50 ± 0.04∗∗ | 1.69 ± 0.06 | 1.54 ± 0.03∗ |
| 0 | 14.80 ± 0.42 | 15.81 ± 0.47 | 15.74 ± 0.51 | 15.81 ± 0.45 | 16.46 ± 0.70 | 16.15 ± 0.46 | 14.54 ± 0.44 | 16.16 ± 0.61 | 14.95 ± 0.46 | 14.85 ± 0.51 |
| 7 | 15.03 ± 0.51 | 38.84 ± 2.01††† | 35.40 ± 1.88 | 30.83 ± 1.97 | 27.06 ± 2.13∗∗ | 22.83 ± 1.45∗∗∗ | 32.84 ± 2.22 | 26.92 ± 2.39∗∗ | 36.89 ± 2.52 | 27.80 ± 2.41∗∗ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6, †p < 0.05; ††p < 0.01; †††p < 0.001 vs. vehicle control, ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 vs. lithiatic control. Values of lithiatic control group were compared with vehicle control and those of drug-treated groups with lithiatic control. BUN = Blood urea nitrogen, SEM = Standard error of mean.
Effect of MBS-fractions on renal parameters in urolithiasis induced rats.
| Parameters | Vehicle control | Lithiatic control | DCM-MBS (20 mg/kg) | DCM-MBS (40 mg/kg) | EA-MBS (20 mg/kg) | EA-MBS (40 mg/kg) | E-MBS (20 mg/kg) | E-MBS (40 mg/kg) | AQ-MBS (20 mg/kg) | AQ-MBS (40 mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium (mg/g) | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02†† | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.02∗ | 0.14 ± 0.01∗∗ | 0.17 ± 0.01∗ | 0.14 ± 0.03∗∗ | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 |
| Oxalate (mg/g) | 1.24 ± 0.09 | 3.53 ± 0.19††† | 3.48 ± 0.16 | 3.56 ± 0.13 | 1.82 ± 0.13∗∗∗ | 1.60 ± 0.12∗∗∗ | 2.49 ± 0.12∗∗∗ | 2.25 ± 0.13∗∗∗ | 3.46 ± 0.12 | 3.15 ± 0.12 |
| Phosphate (mg/g) | 1.97 ± 0.09 | 3.05 ± 0.12††† | 2.90 ± 0.10 | 2.81 ± 0.12 | 2.34 ± 0.11∗∗∗ | 2.20 ± 0.11∗∗∗ | 2.66 ± 0.12 | 2.44 ± 0.10∗∗ | 2.72 ± 0.10 | 2.51 ± 0.12∗∗ |
| Lipid peroxidation (%) | 33.39 ± 2.13 | 100.00 ± 5.18††† | 92.83 ± 4.93 | 95.27 ± 4.98 | 71.57 ± 5.47∗∗ | 58.36 ± 4.92∗∗∗ | 69.41 ± 4.66∗∗ | 63.74 ± 5.38∗∗∗ | 90.75 ± 6.27 | 79.73 ± 6.27 |
| Damage index (Arbitrary units) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 2.88 ± 0.10 | 2.46 ± 0.13 | 2.42 ± 0.15 | 1.79 ± 0.17∗∗∗ | 1.56 ± 0.12∗∗∗ | 2.17 ± 0.14∗∗ | 2.08 ± 0.14∗∗ | 2.25 ± 0.17∗ | 2.13 ± 0.16∗∗ |
| CaOx deposits (No.) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 45.98 ± 2.28 | 42.42 ± 2.04 | 40.81 ± 1.84 | 15.00 ± 2.53∗∗∗ | 8.69 ± 1.11∗∗∗ | 26.71 ± 1.64∗∗∗ | 18.58 ± 1.97∗∗∗ | 36.65 ± 2.26∗ | 33.63 ± 2.53∗∗∗ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6, †p < 0.05; ††p < 0.01; †††p < 0.001 vs. vehicle control, ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 vs. lithiatic control. Values of lithiatic control group were compared with vehicle control and those of drug-treated groups with lithiatic control. CaOx = Calcium oxalate, SEM = Standard error of mean.
Fig. 1Light microscopic images of kidney sections from animals of (A) vehicle control; (B) lithiatic preventive control showing severe histological changes including tubular dilatation and initial cystic changes (marked as ‘a’), tubular atrophy (marked as ‘b’), calcium oxalate crystals deposits (marked as ‘c’) and interstitial mononuclear cell infiltration (marked as ‘d’); (C and D) treatment with DCM-MBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg respectively, showing severe histological changes; (E and F) treatment with EA-MBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg respectively, showing mild histological changes; (G and H) treatment with E-MBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg respectively, showing moderate histological changes; (I and J) treatment with AQ-MBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg respectively, showing moderate histological changes. (H&E × 100).
Fig. 2Microscopic images of kidney sections under light microscope (100x) after Pizzolato's staining from animals of (A) vehicle control; (B) lithiatic preventive control respectively, showing excessive accumulation of calcium oxalate deposits (marked as ‘CaOx’); (C and D) preventive treatment with DCM-MBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg respectively; (E and F) preventive treatment with EA-MBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg respectively; (G and H) preventive treatment with E-MBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg respectively; (I and J) preventive treatment with AQ-MBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg respectively.
Fig. 3High performance thin layer chromatograph (HPTLC) densitogram of (A) Amentoflavone (peak no. 1); (B) EA-MBS standardized to amentoflavone (peak no. 8) and (C) E-MBS (absence of amentoflavone peak) scanned at 366 nm.