Literature DB >> 33076772

Interpretation of Normal and Abnormal Tympanogram Findings in Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Sean M Parsel1, Graham D Unis2, Spenser S Souza3, Heather Bartley4, Jeffrey M Bergeron1, Adam N Master5, Edward D McCoul1,2,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship between objective tympanogram values and patient-reported symptoms and associations with common comorbid conditions. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with prospective data collection.
SETTING: Tertiary medical center.
METHODS: Patients undergoing routine audiometric evaluation between October 2018 and June 2019 were included. Participants with temporomandibular joint dysfunction, inner ear hydrops, and similar conditions were excluded. Symptoms were assessed with the 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire. Demographics and medical comorbidities were recorded from the medical record. Analysis of tympanometric peak pressure (TPP), demographics, and comorbidities was performed to determine associations with clinically significant eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) symptoms.
RESULTS: A total of 250 patients were included with similar demographics: 101 (40.4%) in the asymptomatic group and 149 (59.6%) in the symptomatic group. The median (interquartile range) TPP was -10 (20) daPa and -25 (100) daPa in the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups, respectively. A diagnosis of rhinitis was more likely to be associated with significant ETD symptoms (adjusted odds ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.23-5.63). A subgroup analysis revealed that symptomatic patients with normal TPP values were negatively skewed as compared with asymptomatic patients. This symptomatic group had a higher prevalence of rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis than the asymptomatic group.
CONCLUSION: Patients with symptoms of ETD may have a TPP within a range typically considered normal per conventional standards. This suggests that the currently accepted interpretation of tympanometry findings may be insensitive for the diagnosis of less severe cases of ETD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic impedance tests; allergic; eustachian tube; rhinitis; sinusitis; tympanic membrane

Year:  2020        PMID: 33076772     DOI: 10.1177/0194599820965236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

1.  Association Between Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 Scores and Eustachian Tube Function Test Results in Symptomatic Patients With a Normal Drum.

Authors:  Seojin Moon; Yujin Lee; Jinsei Jung; In Seok Moon; Seong Hoon Bae
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 2.  Predictive value of the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 for identifying obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas S Andresen; Jeffrey D Sharon; Carrie L Nieman; Stella M Seal; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-24

3.  Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube with a seeker-based device: A registry of 169 patients.

Authors:  Robert T Standring; Ellen M O'Malley; Joshua B Greene; Joseph L Russell; Edward D McCoul
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-10

4.  Clinical Analysis of Ear Congestion after Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty (BET) with or without Tympanostomy Tube Insertion.

Authors:  Nina Chen; Shuguang Han; Wenjuan Li; Dong Li; Libo Hu; Shusheng Gong
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Revisiting the Diagnostic Performance of the Modified Nine-Step Test for Obstructive and Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Bae; Seojin Moon; Mincheol Jeong; In Seok Moon
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.